Commercial coverage of specialty drugs, 2017-2021.

IF 4.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Management Inquiry Pub Date : 2023-08-04 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxad030
Julia A Rucker, Molly T Beinfeld, Nola B Jenkins, Daniel E Enright, Rochelle R Henderson, James D Chambers
{"title":"Commercial coverage of specialty drugs, 2017-2021.","authors":"Julia A Rucker, Molly T Beinfeld, Nola B Jenkins, Daniel E Enright, Rochelle R Henderson, James D Chambers","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxad030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health plans guide their enrollees' access to specialty drugs through coverage policies. We examined a set of health plan policies to determine if they have become more or less stringent over time. We did so by comparing the consistency of policies with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label indications. We considered coverage policies for the same 187 specialty drugs issued by 17 large US commercial health plans from 2017 through 2021. Overall, the proportion of policies that were consistent with the FDA label declined from 57.1% in 2017 to 45.1% in 2021; the proportion of policies that were more restrictive than the FDA label increased from 39.5% to 51.7%. The proportion of policies excluding drug coverage remained approximately constant (3.4% in 2017; 3.2% in 2021). Trends in coverage restrictiveness varied across plans. For 13 plans, the proportion of policies with restrictions increased over time, while for 4 plans it declined.</p>","PeriodicalId":47877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Inquiry","volume":"3 1","pages":"qxad030"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxad030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health plans guide their enrollees' access to specialty drugs through coverage policies. We examined a set of health plan policies to determine if they have become more or less stringent over time. We did so by comparing the consistency of policies with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label indications. We considered coverage policies for the same 187 specialty drugs issued by 17 large US commercial health plans from 2017 through 2021. Overall, the proportion of policies that were consistent with the FDA label declined from 57.1% in 2017 to 45.1% in 2021; the proportion of policies that were more restrictive than the FDA label increased from 39.5% to 51.7%. The proportion of policies excluding drug coverage remained approximately constant (3.4% in 2017; 3.2% in 2021). Trends in coverage restrictiveness varied across plans. For 13 plans, the proportion of policies with restrictions increased over time, while for 4 plans it declined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2017-2021 年特殊药品的商业覆盖率。
医保计划通过承保政策来指导参保者使用特药。我们研究了一系列医疗保险政策,以确定这些政策是否随着时间的推移而变得更加严格。我们通过比较政策与食品药品管理局 (FDA) 标签适应症的一致性来实现这一目的。我们考虑了美国 17 家大型商业健康计划从 2017 年到 2021 年针对相同 187 种特殊药品发布的承保政策。总体而言,与 FDA 标签一致的政策比例从 2017 年的 57.1%下降到 2021 年的 45.1%;比 FDA 标签限制更多的政策比例从 39.5%上升到 51.7%。不包括药物保险的保单比例基本保持不变(2017 年为 3.4%;2021 年为 3.2%)。不同计划的承保限制趋势各不相同。在 13 个计划中,有限制的保单比例随着时间的推移而增加,而在 4 个计划中则有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Inquiry, sponsored by the Western Academy of Management, is a refereed journal for scholars and professionals in management, organizational behavior, strategy, and human resources. Its intent is to explore ideas and build knowledge in management theory and practice, with a focus on creative, nontraditional research as well as key controversies in the field. The journal seeks to maintain a constructive balance between innovation and quality, and at the same time widely define the forms that relevant contributions to the field can take. JMI features six sections: Meet the Person, Provocations, Reflections on Experience, Nontraditional Research, Essays, and Dialog.
期刊最新文献
Managing Social Impact Bonds: Intermediary Work and Designing Institutional Infrastructure Wake up! Advancing the Conversation on Woke Labeling Psychedelics, Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy and Employees’ Wellbeing A Revisionist History Approach to the Study of Emotional Labor: Have We Forgotten Display Rules and Service Contexts? Back to the Future: What We’d Change in “Social Identity Theory and the Organization” (Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 20–39)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1