Detection of multidrug resistance and associated genes among Salmonella species from enteric fever cases

S. Elumalai, G. Muthu, E. Selvam, S. Thiagarajan, S. Seetharaman
{"title":"Detection of multidrug resistance and associated genes among Salmonella species from enteric fever cases","authors":"S. Elumalai, G. Muthu, E. Selvam, S. Thiagarajan, S. Seetharaman","doi":"10.4038/sljid.v12i2.8436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Salmonella spp. has rapidly gained resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, and tetracycline (ACCoT) which necessitated the use of fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins. However, there are reports on emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella isolates in various parts of Asia and low resistance to third-generation cephalosporins. The incidence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) in India increased in the 1990s. After a decade, studies showed reduced MDR percentage. Hence this study was performed to detect antibiotic resistance patterns and associated genes among clinical isolates of Salmonella. Methods: A total of 171 clinical isolates of Salmonella isolates collected between 2011 to 2016 from a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, India were included. Antibiotic susceptibility testing and screening for extended-spectrum β-lactamase production was performed. Genes encoding resistance to β-lactam antibiotics (blaTEM, blaSHV, and blaCTX-M), chloramphenicol (cat, cmlA, and floR), co-trimoxazole (sul1, sul2, sul3, and dfr), and tetracycline (tet(A), tet(B), tet(C), tet(D), tet(E), and tet(G)) were detected using PCR and nucleotide sequencing analysis. Results: The majority of the isolates were susceptible to ACCoT antibiotics, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. Most of the isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid and 1.7% were sensitive to ciprofloxacin. All the isolates (n=171) were negative for ESBL. Multidrug resistance was seen in 4.1% isolates and all the MDR Salmonella isolates were found to contain blaTEM-1(TEM-1-type β-lactamase), cat, dfrA17, sul1, and tet(B) genes.","PeriodicalId":32303,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljid.v12i2.8436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Salmonella spp. has rapidly gained resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, and tetracycline (ACCoT) which necessitated the use of fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins. However, there are reports on emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella isolates in various parts of Asia and low resistance to third-generation cephalosporins. The incidence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) in India increased in the 1990s. After a decade, studies showed reduced MDR percentage. Hence this study was performed to detect antibiotic resistance patterns and associated genes among clinical isolates of Salmonella. Methods: A total of 171 clinical isolates of Salmonella isolates collected between 2011 to 2016 from a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, India were included. Antibiotic susceptibility testing and screening for extended-spectrum β-lactamase production was performed. Genes encoding resistance to β-lactam antibiotics (blaTEM, blaSHV, and blaCTX-M), chloramphenicol (cat, cmlA, and floR), co-trimoxazole (sul1, sul2, sul3, and dfr), and tetracycline (tet(A), tet(B), tet(C), tet(D), tet(E), and tet(G)) were detected using PCR and nucleotide sequencing analysis. Results: The majority of the isolates were susceptible to ACCoT antibiotics, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. Most of the isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid and 1.7% were sensitive to ciprofloxacin. All the isolates (n=171) were negative for ESBL. Multidrug resistance was seen in 4.1% isolates and all the MDR Salmonella isolates were found to contain blaTEM-1(TEM-1-type β-lactamase), cat, dfrA17, sul1, and tet(B) genes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠炎热沙门氏菌多药耐药及相关基因检测
背景:沙门氏菌对氨苄西林、氯霉素、复方新诺明和四环素(ACCoT)迅速产生耐药性,需要使用氟喹诺酮类药物和头孢菌素。然而,有报道称在亚洲不同地区出现了对氟喹诺酮类药物耐药的沙门氏菌分离株,并且对第三代头孢菌素的耐药性较低。20世纪90年代,印度的多重耐药伤寒沙门氏菌(MDR)发病率有所上升。十年后,研究表明耐多药率降低了。因此,本研究旨在检测沙门氏菌临床分离株的抗生素耐药模式和相关基因。方法:收集2011 - 2016年在印度金奈某三级医院采集的171株沙门氏菌临床分离株。进行抗生素药敏试验和广谱β-内酰胺酶生产筛选。采用PCR和核苷酸测序方法检测β-内酰胺类抗生素(blaTEM、blaSHV和blaCTX-M)、氯霉素(cat、cmlA和floR)、复方新诺明(sul1、sul2、sul3和dfr)和四环素(tet(A)、tet(B)、tet(C)、tet(D)、tet(E)和tet(G))的耐药基因。结果:多数分离株对ACCoT类抗生素、头孢菌素类和碳青霉烯类药物敏感。大部分菌株对萘啶酸耐药,1.7%对环丙沙星敏感。所有分离株(n=171)均为ESBL阴性。4.1%的菌株出现多药耐药,所有MDR沙门氏菌均含有tem -1型β-内酰胺酶(TEM-1-type β-lactamase)、cat、dfrA17、sul1和tet(B)基因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Serologic evidence of Zika virus, hepatitis B virus and rubella virus in pregnant women attending a south-west based Nigerian tertiary care centre An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based study Antibiotic allergy: Mislabels, Misinterpretation and Mismanagement Clinical characteristics and analysis of treatment outcome at one year of rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis cases during the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic (2nd wave); experiences from a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata, India Detection of carbapenemase producing enterobacterales using the Modified Hodge Test from clinical isolates in Colombo South Teaching Hospital and Sri Jayewardenepura General Hospital, Sri Lanka in 2017 Comparison of broth microdilution and E-test for susceptibility of MRSA to vancomycin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1