Determination of combination therapy prescribing patterns for the treatment of acute agitation in psychiatric patients: A regression model of patient diagnoses and demographics

Mark S Maas, Karen E. Moeller, B. Melton
{"title":"Determination of combination therapy prescribing patterns for the treatment of acute agitation in psychiatric patients: A regression model of patient diagnoses and demographics","authors":"Mark S Maas, Karen E. Moeller, B. Melton","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2019.09.298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Guidelines for the treatment of acute agitation typically recommend monotherapy with an antipsychotic or a benzodiazepine, but combination therapy is frequently used in practice. We created a regression model to identify which factors lead to the prescribing of combination therapy for acute agitation on a psychiatry unit. Methods We collected retrospective data from hospitalized patients in the psychiatry unit. An a priori alpha of 0.05 was used for binary logistic regression models to determine if and how the number of prescribed medications for acute agitation was influenced by: age, sex, race, cardiovascular comorbidities, and psychiatric diagnoses. Results We identified 1998 encounters from 1200 patients. Patients are significantly more likely to be prescribed combination therapy if they are young, male, and of non-white race or have a diagnosis of central nervous system stimulant use, hallucinogen use, depression, bipolar, cluster B personality, or psychosis. Patients are significantly more likely to be prescribed monotherapy if they have cardiovascular comorbidity or have neurocognitive disorder. Discussion Several demographic or diagnostic factors predict combination therapy prescribing. Acute agitation guidelines should be reviewed to include more clear instructions on combination therapy use.","PeriodicalId":101313,"journal":{"name":"The mental health clinician","volume":"9 1","pages":"298 - 303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The mental health clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2019.09.298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Guidelines for the treatment of acute agitation typically recommend monotherapy with an antipsychotic or a benzodiazepine, but combination therapy is frequently used in practice. We created a regression model to identify which factors lead to the prescribing of combination therapy for acute agitation on a psychiatry unit. Methods We collected retrospective data from hospitalized patients in the psychiatry unit. An a priori alpha of 0.05 was used for binary logistic regression models to determine if and how the number of prescribed medications for acute agitation was influenced by: age, sex, race, cardiovascular comorbidities, and psychiatric diagnoses. Results We identified 1998 encounters from 1200 patients. Patients are significantly more likely to be prescribed combination therapy if they are young, male, and of non-white race or have a diagnosis of central nervous system stimulant use, hallucinogen use, depression, bipolar, cluster B personality, or psychosis. Patients are significantly more likely to be prescribed monotherapy if they have cardiovascular comorbidity or have neurocognitive disorder. Discussion Several demographic or diagnostic factors predict combination therapy prescribing. Acute agitation guidelines should be reviewed to include more clear instructions on combination therapy use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定治疗急性躁动精神病患者的联合治疗处方模式:患者诊断和人口统计学的回归模型
急性躁动的治疗指南通常推荐使用抗精神病药或苯二氮卓类药物进行单药治疗,但在实践中也经常使用联合治疗。我们创建了一个回归模型,以确定哪些因素导致处方联合治疗急性躁动在精神病学单位。方法收集精神科住院患者的回顾性资料。二元logistic回归模型的先验alpha值为0.05,以确定急性躁动的处方药物数量是否以及如何受到以下因素的影响:年龄、性别、种族、心血管合并症和精神病学诊断。结果我们从1200名患者中确定了1998次接触。如果患者年轻、男性、非白种人或被诊断为使用中枢神经系统兴奋剂、使用致幻剂、抑郁症、双相情感障碍、B型人格或精神病,则更有可能接受处方联合治疗。如果患者有心血管合并症或神经认知障碍,则更有可能接受单药治疗。几个人口学或诊断因素预测联合治疗处方。急性躁动指南应重新审查,包括更明确的指导联合治疗的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacist administration of long-acting injectable medications for substance use disorders: A scoping review. Impact of weight loss surgery on valproic acid levels: A case report. Potential changes impacting psychiatric pharmacy by 2030. A model for timely dissemination of critical information: Clozapine toxicity during the COVID pandemic. Transitions of care: Assessment of adherence to long-acting injectable antipsychotic treatment following discharge from inpatient psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1