Evaluation of the influential factors on the mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction

Adalat Hoseinian, M. Bahadoram, F. Amani, Sajjad Hakimian, Saba Attar-Madraki, Raana Jafarizadeh
{"title":"Evaluation of the influential factors on the mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction","authors":"Adalat Hoseinian, M. Bahadoram, F. Amani, Sajjad Hakimian, Saba Attar-Madraki, Raana Jafarizadeh","doi":"10.34172/jpe.2022.26179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Death caused by myocardial infarction (MI) usually occurs during the first hours after the onset of symptoms. Therefore, to manage, treat and decrease the mortality rate of these patients, early hospital admission is important. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the impact of the influential factors on mortality of patients with MI. Patients and Methods: In this case-control study, MI patients who were referred to the Ardabil Alavi Hospital, Ardabil university of medical sciences, Ardabil, Iran between April 2017 and April 2018 were included. The patients that had died due to MI were considered as the case group (n=27) and 27 matched patients that had died due to other causes were selected as the control group. Linear logistic regression was employed to analyze the data. Results: The mean age of the patients in the case group was significantly higher than in the control group (75.1±11.7 versus 63.;1±11.6, P=0.001). The history of non-cardiac diseases in the case group (44.4%) was significantly higher than in the control group (7.4%; P=0.002). The number of PCIs (percutaneous coronary interventions) that were conducted in the case group (40.7%) was significantly lower than in the control group (74.1%; p=0.013). The time distance between hospital admission and PCI performance in the case group (110.9 minutes) was significantly higher than in the control group (56 minutes; P=0.001). However, the mean of delay time from the onset of symptoms to hospital admission (the patient delay) and from hospital admission to receiving treatment (the health system delay) was similar between the two groups. Conclusion: This study showed that the number of performed PCIs, history of non-cardiac disorders and the interval between the onset of symptoms and PCI performance are significantly associated with the morality of MI patients.","PeriodicalId":91739,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epidemiology and preventive medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epidemiology and preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jpe.2022.26179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Death caused by myocardial infarction (MI) usually occurs during the first hours after the onset of symptoms. Therefore, to manage, treat and decrease the mortality rate of these patients, early hospital admission is important. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the impact of the influential factors on mortality of patients with MI. Patients and Methods: In this case-control study, MI patients who were referred to the Ardabil Alavi Hospital, Ardabil university of medical sciences, Ardabil, Iran between April 2017 and April 2018 were included. The patients that had died due to MI were considered as the case group (n=27) and 27 matched patients that had died due to other causes were selected as the control group. Linear logistic regression was employed to analyze the data. Results: The mean age of the patients in the case group was significantly higher than in the control group (75.1±11.7 versus 63.;1±11.6, P=0.001). The history of non-cardiac diseases in the case group (44.4%) was significantly higher than in the control group (7.4%; P=0.002). The number of PCIs (percutaneous coronary interventions) that were conducted in the case group (40.7%) was significantly lower than in the control group (74.1%; p=0.013). The time distance between hospital admission and PCI performance in the case group (110.9 minutes) was significantly higher than in the control group (56 minutes; P=0.001). However, the mean of delay time from the onset of symptoms to hospital admission (the patient delay) and from hospital admission to receiving treatment (the health system delay) was similar between the two groups. Conclusion: This study showed that the number of performed PCIs, history of non-cardiac disorders and the interval between the onset of symptoms and PCI performance are significantly associated with the morality of MI patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性心肌梗死患者死亡率的影响因素分析
简介:心肌梗死(MI)引起的死亡通常发生在症状出现后的最初几个小时内。因此,及早住院治疗对管理、治疗和降低死亡率具有重要意义。目的:我们旨在探讨影响因素对心肌梗死患者死亡率的影响。患者和方法:本病例对照研究纳入2017年4月至2018年4月在伊朗阿达比勒阿达比勒医学院阿达比勒Alavi医院转诊的心肌梗死患者。将因心肌梗死死亡的患者作为病例组(n=27),选择27例匹配的其他原因死亡的患者作为对照组。采用线性逻辑回归对数据进行分析。结果:病例组患者的平均年龄明显高于对照组(75.1±11.7∶63;1±11.6,P=0.001)。病例组非心脏病史(44.4%)显著高于对照组(7.4%;P = 0.002)。病例组经皮冠状动脉介入治疗次数(40.7%)明显低于对照组(74.1%);p = 0.013)。病例组从入院到PCI执行的时间间隔(110.9分钟)显著高于对照组(56分钟;P = 0.001)。然而,从症状出现到住院(患者延迟)和从住院到接受治疗(卫生系统延迟)的平均延迟时间在两组之间相似。结论:本研究显示,行PCI次数、非心脏疾病史、症状发作与PCI行PCI之间的时间间隔与心肌梗死患者的道德水平显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collapsing glomerulopathy; a review on current studies Association of demographic characteristics with mental anxiety caused by the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in candidate patients for cataract surgery Association of the severity and pattern of pituitary adenoma-related headache with the size and type of adenoma Prevalence of nosocomial infections in Lordegan Shohada hospital from 2017 to 2022 Modes of drainage of kidneys with bilateral malignant obstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1