John Damascene or Jerusalem monk John

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.2298/ZRVI1451007P
J. Pavlovic
{"title":"John Damascene or Jerusalem monk John","authors":"J. Pavlovic","doi":"10.2298/ZRVI1451007P","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of original manuscripts wrongly claim authority of the treatise Adversus Constantinum Caballinum to John of Damascus. We applied the method of detailed linguistic analysis in order to check the hypothesis that Jerusalem monk John, the representative of three eastern patriarchs on the Second Council of Nicaea, wrote this iconophile work. Stylistic resemblance between the speech that John of Jerusalem held on the Second Council of Nicaea and sermon Adversus Constantinum Caballinum could indicate the same person as author.","PeriodicalId":53859,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta","volume":"15 1","pages":"7-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/ZRVI1451007P","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most of original manuscripts wrongly claim authority of the treatise Adversus Constantinum Caballinum to John of Damascus. We applied the method of detailed linguistic analysis in order to check the hypothesis that Jerusalem monk John, the representative of three eastern patriarchs on the Second Council of Nicaea, wrote this iconophile work. Stylistic resemblance between the speech that John of Jerusalem held on the Second Council of Nicaea and sermon Adversus Constantinum Caballinum could indicate the same person as author.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大马士革的约翰或者耶路撒冷的僧侣约翰
大多数原始手稿错误地声称《君士坦丁》一书的权威属于大马士革的约翰。为了验证在尼西亚第二次大公会议上代表三位东方宗主教的耶路撒冷修道士约翰写了这部亲象作品的假设,我们采用了详细的语言分析方法。耶路撒冷的约翰在尼西亚第二次大公会议上的演讲和讲道Adversus Constantinum Caballinum的风格相似可以表明作者是同一个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta
Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
On the inscription on the baptismal font from the time of Prince Viseslav: Some epigraphic remarks Contract of loan and protection of debtors against usury in Serbian mediaeval law (regarding the influence of Byzantine law) Warrior saints at Nerezi - the selection of figures and other remarks on their iconography Obrok from article 110 of the Dushan code and posul from legal sources of Russian medieval law The serbs and the war against the Turks in the letters of Francesco Filelfo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1