Data trusts: more data than trust? The perspective of the data subject in the face of a growing problem

Christine Rinik
{"title":"Data trusts: more data than trust? The perspective of the data subject in the face of a growing problem","authors":"Christine Rinik","doi":"10.1080/13600869.2019.1594621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The recent report, Growing the Artificial Intelligence Industry in the UK (Hall, Wendy, and Jerome Pesenti. 2017, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/growing-the-artificial-intelligence-industry-in-the-uk) suggests the use of a 'data trust' to facilitate data sharing. Whilst government and corporations are focusing on their need to facilitate data sharing, the perspective of many individuals is that too much data is being shared. The issue is not only about data, but about power. The individual does not often have a voice when issues relating to data sharing are tackled. Regulators can cite the ‘public interest’ when data governance is discussed, but the individual’s interests may diverge from that of the public. This paper considers the data subject's position with respect to data collection leading to considerations about surveillance and datafication. Proposals for data trusts will be considered applying principles of English trust law to possibly mitigate the imbalance of power between large data users and individual data subjects. Finally, the possibility of a workable remedy in the form of a class action lawsuit which could give the data subjects some collective power in the event of a data breach will be explored. Despite regulatory efforts to protect personal data, there is a lack of public trust in the current data sharing system.","PeriodicalId":53660,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Law, Computers and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Law, Computers and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2019.1594621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT The recent report, Growing the Artificial Intelligence Industry in the UK (Hall, Wendy, and Jerome Pesenti. 2017, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/growing-the-artificial-intelligence-industry-in-the-uk) suggests the use of a 'data trust' to facilitate data sharing. Whilst government and corporations are focusing on their need to facilitate data sharing, the perspective of many individuals is that too much data is being shared. The issue is not only about data, but about power. The individual does not often have a voice when issues relating to data sharing are tackled. Regulators can cite the ‘public interest’ when data governance is discussed, but the individual’s interests may diverge from that of the public. This paper considers the data subject's position with respect to data collection leading to considerations about surveillance and datafication. Proposals for data trusts will be considered applying principles of English trust law to possibly mitigate the imbalance of power between large data users and individual data subjects. Finally, the possibility of a workable remedy in the form of a class action lawsuit which could give the data subjects some collective power in the event of a data breach will be explored. Despite regulatory efforts to protect personal data, there is a lack of public trust in the current data sharing system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数据信任:数据多于信任?数据主体的视角面临着日益严重的问题
最近的报告《英国人工智能产业的发展》(Hall, Wendy, and Jerome Pesenti. 2017, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/growing-the-artificial-intelligence-industry-in-the-uk)建议使用“数据信任”来促进数据共享。虽然政府和企业都在关注他们促进数据共享的需要,但许多个人的观点是,太多的数据正在被共享。这个问题不仅关乎数据,也关乎权力。在处理与数据共享有关的问题时,个人通常没有发言权。当讨论数据治理时,监管机构可以引用“公共利益”,但个人的利益可能与公众的利益不同。本文考虑了数据主体在数据收集方面的地位,从而考虑到监控和数据化。数据信托的建议将考虑应用英国信托法的原则,以可能减轻大数据用户和个人数据主体之间的权力不平衡。最后,将探讨以集体诉讼的形式进行可行补救的可能性,这种形式可以在数据泄露事件中赋予数据主体一些集体权力。尽管监管机构努力保护个人数据,但公众对当前的数据共享系统缺乏信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Certification as guidance for data protection by design Regulatory options for vehicle telematics devices: balancing driver safety, data privacy and data security Electronic justice as a mechanism for ensuring the right of access to justice in a pandemic: the experience of Ukraine and the EU Algorithms patrolling content: where’s the harm? Editorial for special issue. BILETA Conference 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1