A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous and Intramuscular Ketorolac for Post-Cesarean Analgesia

C. Fidkowski
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous and Intramuscular Ketorolac for Post-Cesarean Analgesia","authors":"C. Fidkowski","doi":"10.4172/2155-6148.1000861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgroundː Optimal analgesia post-cesarean delivery is essential to promote maternal recovery for the care of the newborn. Intravenous (IV) ketorolac is commonly administered as a part of multi-modal analgesia for cesarean delivery. Ketorolac pharmacokinetics is altered in pregnancy. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of IV and intramuscular (IM) ketorolac for post-cesarean analgesia. Methodsː This study is a prospective, double blinded, randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of IV versus IM ketorolac administration on post-cesarean analgesia. Patients undergoing an elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive either 30 mg IV ketorolac (Group 30IV), 30 mg IM ketorolac (Group 30IM), or 60 mg IM ketorolac (Group 60IM). Primary outcomes include time to the first analgesic, total analgesic consumption, and pain scores. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, opioid related side effects, and length of hospital stay. Resultsː The time to first break through pain was not statistically significant in the IM groups as compared to the IV group (Group 30IV 527 min, Group 30IM 578 min and Group 60IM 581 min). Pain scores and post-operative analgesic use did not differ significantly between groups. Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups. Conclusionsː IV and IM ketorolac are equally effective for post-cesarean analgesia.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Backgroundː Optimal analgesia post-cesarean delivery is essential to promote maternal recovery for the care of the newborn. Intravenous (IV) ketorolac is commonly administered as a part of multi-modal analgesia for cesarean delivery. Ketorolac pharmacokinetics is altered in pregnancy. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of IV and intramuscular (IM) ketorolac for post-cesarean analgesia. Methodsː This study is a prospective, double blinded, randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of IV versus IM ketorolac administration on post-cesarean analgesia. Patients undergoing an elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive either 30 mg IV ketorolac (Group 30IV), 30 mg IM ketorolac (Group 30IM), or 60 mg IM ketorolac (Group 60IM). Primary outcomes include time to the first analgesic, total analgesic consumption, and pain scores. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, opioid related side effects, and length of hospital stay. Resultsː The time to first break through pain was not statistically significant in the IM groups as compared to the IV group (Group 30IV 527 min, Group 30IM 578 min and Group 60IM 581 min). Pain scores and post-operative analgesic use did not differ significantly between groups. Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups. Conclusionsː IV and IM ketorolac are equally effective for post-cesarean analgesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫剖宫产后静脉注射和肌肉注射酮咯酸镇痛的随机对照试验
背景剖宫产后最佳镇痛对促进产妇康复护理新生儿至关重要。静脉注射(IV)酮罗拉酸通常作为剖宫产多模式镇痛的一部分。酮咯酸药代动力学在妊娠期发生改变。本研究的目的是比较静脉注射和肌注酮罗拉酸对剖宫产后镇痛的效果。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验,评估静脉注射与静脉注射酮罗拉酸对剖宫产后镇痛的疗效。在脊髓麻醉下择期剖宫产的患者被随机分为静脉注射30mg酮罗拉酸(30IV组)、静脉注射30mg酮罗拉酸(30IM组)或静脉注射60mg酮罗拉酸(60IM组)。主要结局包括首次使用镇痛药的时间、镇痛药总用量和疼痛评分。次要结局包括患者满意度、阿片类药物相关副作用和住院时间。结果IM组与静脉注射组(30IV组527 min、30IM组578 min、60IM组581 min)相比,首次突破疼痛时间无统计学意义。组间疼痛评分和术后镇痛药使用无显著差异。两组间的次要结果没有差异。结论静脉注射与静脉注射酮罗拉酸对剖宫产后镇痛效果相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Sutured on the Pulmonary Trunk and Relevant Clinical Consequences Study in a Simulated Scenario of the Influence of Training and Personality in the Resolution of Critical Situations in Anaesthesiology Residents Pulmonary Thrombosis in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Theory, Evidence, and Clinical Relevance to Resource-Limited Settings Management of Cerebropontine Angle Tumors on Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Facilitating Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Retrospective Observational Study Efficacy of Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block as Analgesic Modality in Clavicle Fractures: Exploring New Horizons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1