Survey of U.S. cow-calf producer access to and use of technology for cattle health and production record-keeping purposes

W. I. Jumper, C. Huston, Robert W. Willis, David R. Smith
{"title":"Survey of U.S. cow-calf producer access to and use of technology for cattle health and production record-keeping purposes","authors":"W. I. Jumper, C. Huston, Robert W. Willis, David R. Smith","doi":"10.21423/bovine-vol56no2p16-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to describe U.S. cow-calf producer access to and use of technology for managing cattle health and production records (CHPR). We anonymously surveyed 14,294 U.S. cow-calf producers. Multivariable logistic regression by manual forward variable selection was used to test demographic factors for association with CHPR-keeping technology outcomes. Smartphones, computers, and internet were available to 85.2%, 92.9%, and 88.7% of respondents, respectively. Factors associated with interest in a smartphone-based CHPR-keeping system included: smartphone use (OR = 7.7; compared to not using a smartphone), respondent age (≤ 54 years: OR = 4.8; 55-64 years: OR = 2.6; 65-74 years: OR = 1.5; compared to ≥75 years), electronic survey response (OR = 2.2; compared to paper), respondent keeps any form of CHPR (OR = 2.0; compared to no CHPR use), respondent education level (some college up to completed Bachelor’s degree: OR = 1.4; post-graduate or professional degree: OR = 1.5; compared to high-school diploma or less), cow-calf operation is not primary income source (OR = 1.3; compared to cow-calf operation being primary income source), region of the U.S. (midwest: OR = 1.1; mountain: OR = 0.8; northeast: OR = 1.4; northern plains: OR = 0.9; southeast: OR = 1.4; southern plains: OR = 1.0; compared to west) and respondent herd size (50-199 head: OR = 1.2; ≥ 200 head: OR = 1.4; compared to ≤ 49 head). Technology needed for electronic CHPR-keeping is common among U.S. cow-calf producers, however, individual demographic characteristics modified interest in electronic CHPR-keeping.","PeriodicalId":22281,"journal":{"name":"The Bovine practitioner","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bovine practitioner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol56no2p16-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe U.S. cow-calf producer access to and use of technology for managing cattle health and production records (CHPR). We anonymously surveyed 14,294 U.S. cow-calf producers. Multivariable logistic regression by manual forward variable selection was used to test demographic factors for association with CHPR-keeping technology outcomes. Smartphones, computers, and internet were available to 85.2%, 92.9%, and 88.7% of respondents, respectively. Factors associated with interest in a smartphone-based CHPR-keeping system included: smartphone use (OR = 7.7; compared to not using a smartphone), respondent age (≤ 54 years: OR = 4.8; 55-64 years: OR = 2.6; 65-74 years: OR = 1.5; compared to ≥75 years), electronic survey response (OR = 2.2; compared to paper), respondent keeps any form of CHPR (OR = 2.0; compared to no CHPR use), respondent education level (some college up to completed Bachelor’s degree: OR = 1.4; post-graduate or professional degree: OR = 1.5; compared to high-school diploma or less), cow-calf operation is not primary income source (OR = 1.3; compared to cow-calf operation being primary income source), region of the U.S. (midwest: OR = 1.1; mountain: OR = 0.8; northeast: OR = 1.4; northern plains: OR = 0.9; southeast: OR = 1.4; southern plains: OR = 1.0; compared to west) and respondent herd size (50-199 head: OR = 1.2; ≥ 200 head: OR = 1.4; compared to ≤ 49 head). Technology needed for electronic CHPR-keeping is common among U.S. cow-calf producers, however, individual demographic characteristics modified interest in electronic CHPR-keeping.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查美国小牛生产者获取和使用技术的牛的健康和生产记录保存的目的
本研究的目的是描述美国小牛生产者获取和使用管理牛健康和生产记录(CHPR)的技术。我们匿名调查了14294名美国小牛生产者。采用人工正向变量选择的多变量logistic回归来检验人口统计学因素与chpr保持技术结果的关联。85.2%的受访者使用智能手机,92.9%的受访者使用电脑,88.7%的受访者使用互联网。对基于智能手机的chpr保持系统感兴趣的相关因素包括:智能手机使用(OR = 7.7;与不使用智能手机相比),受访者年龄(≤54岁:OR = 4.8;55-64岁:OR = 2.6;65-74岁:OR = 1.5;与≥75岁相比),电子调查回应(OR = 2.2;与纸张相比),被调查者保留任何形式的CHPR (OR = 2.0;与未使用CHPR者相比),受访者的教育水平(某些大学至完成学士学位:OR = 1.4;研究生或专业学位:or = 1.5;与高中学历或更低学历的人相比),经营小牛不是主要收入来源(or = 1.3;与以小牛为主要收入来源相比),美国地区(中西部:OR = 1.1;mountain: OR = 0.8;东北:OR = 1.4;北部平原:OR = 0.9;东南:OR = 1.4;南部平原:OR = 1.0;与西部相比)和被调查者群体规模(50-199头:OR = 1.2;≥200头:OR = 1.4;与≤49头相比)。电子chpr保存所需的技术在美国小牛生产者中很普遍,然而,个体人口统计学特征改变了对电子chpr保存的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health and performance outcomes from a randomized clinical trial of post-metaphylactic intervals following tildipirosin metaphylaxis for control of naturally occurring BRD in commingled lightweight yearling steers in a commercial feedlot Failed transfer of passive immunity is a component cause of pre-weaning disease in beef and dairy calves: A systematic review and meta-analysis Survey of veterinary involvement in cattle health and production record-keeping on U.S. cow-calf operations Maintenance of the last step of the cold chain: on-farm refrigerator storage and performance Survey of U.S. cow-calf producer access to and use of technology for cattle health and production record-keeping purposes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1