Hypertheatre or Media Entanglement in the Theatre of Jay Scheib

IF 0.1 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Acta Universitatis Sapientiae-Film and Media Studies Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1515/ausfm-2016-0012
M. Deaca
{"title":"Hypertheatre or Media Entanglement in the Theatre of Jay Scheib","authors":"M. Deaca","doi":"10.1515/ausfm-2016-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The theatre of Jay Scheib blends theatrical and filmic features, allowing for a theoretical investigation of the manner in which two different media coexist on the same expressive support. How can two distinct media like film and theatre fuse and, at the same time, be apprehended as separate artistic means in a single artifact? The present article uses a theoretical interpretive metaphor that rests on an application of the mechanisms of relationship between two physical systems issued from the quantum mechanical view of reality. From this perspective, the two afore-mentioned media are in an entangled state. Media is understood as “potential materials or forms for future practices,” or “automatisms” (Rodowick 2007, 42). At the same time, theatrical or cinematic media is apprehended by the audience in a dynamic way, not defined as a static bundle of defining features. Dynamic conceptualization will modulate or “tune” the comprehension of one of the media considered to be a subordinate system in the duplex. The blending of the two media presupposes a local conceptualization unfolding dynamically and an entangled one manifested nonlocal. The distinction between film and theatre is also to be seen as a difference in the cognitive model which posits a detached display (a screen/a scene), an imaginary world (a diegesis) and a spectator (observer). In theatre, the body of the observer is inside the theatrical display setting, while in film, the body of the viewer is conceptualized to be separated from the cinematic display. The notion of threshold, introduced by Dudley Andrew (2010), renders this shift of attention from one side of the display to the other.","PeriodicalId":40721,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae-Film and Media Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae-Film and Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ausfm-2016-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The theatre of Jay Scheib blends theatrical and filmic features, allowing for a theoretical investigation of the manner in which two different media coexist on the same expressive support. How can two distinct media like film and theatre fuse and, at the same time, be apprehended as separate artistic means in a single artifact? The present article uses a theoretical interpretive metaphor that rests on an application of the mechanisms of relationship between two physical systems issued from the quantum mechanical view of reality. From this perspective, the two afore-mentioned media are in an entangled state. Media is understood as “potential materials or forms for future practices,” or “automatisms” (Rodowick 2007, 42). At the same time, theatrical or cinematic media is apprehended by the audience in a dynamic way, not defined as a static bundle of defining features. Dynamic conceptualization will modulate or “tune” the comprehension of one of the media considered to be a subordinate system in the duplex. The blending of the two media presupposes a local conceptualization unfolding dynamically and an entangled one manifested nonlocal. The distinction between film and theatre is also to be seen as a difference in the cognitive model which posits a detached display (a screen/a scene), an imaginary world (a diegesis) and a spectator (observer). In theatre, the body of the observer is inside the theatrical display setting, while in film, the body of the viewer is conceptualized to be separated from the cinematic display. The notion of threshold, introduced by Dudley Andrew (2010), renders this shift of attention from one side of the display to the other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杰伊·沙伊布戏剧中的超级剧场或媒介纠缠
杰伊·沙伊布的戏剧融合了戏剧和电影的特点,允许对两种不同媒体在同一表达支持下共存的方式进行理论研究。像电影和戏剧这样的两种截然不同的媒体如何融合,同时在单一的人工制品中被理解为独立的艺术手段?本文使用了一种理论解释隐喻,该隐喻依赖于从现实的量子力学观点出发的两个物理系统之间关系机制的应用。从这个角度看,上述两种介质处于纠缠态。媒体被理解为“未来实践的潜在材料或形式”,或“自动性”(Rodowick 2007,42)。与此同时,戏剧或电影媒体以一种动态的方式被观众所理解,而不是被定义为一堆静态的定义特征。动态概念化将调节或“调谐”被认为是双工系统中从属系统的媒体之一的理解。两种媒介的融合以动态展开的局部概念化和非局部的纠缠概念化为前提。电影和戏剧之间的区别也可以看作是认知模式的不同,认知模式假设了一个分离的展示(屏幕/场景),一个想象的世界(叙事)和一个观众(观察者)。在戏剧中,观察者的身体在戏剧的展示环境中,而在电影中,观众的身体被概念化,从电影的展示中分离出来。Dudley Andrew(2010)引入的阈值概念将注意力从显示器的一侧转移到另一侧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Stakeholder Spectrum. The History and the Current State of Participatory Film in Hungary Immanence, Ethics and Dystopia in The Lobster by Yorgos Lanthimos You-Too: Mental Hygiene Methodology for College-Age Students Dance and the Mediated Immersive Flux in Carlos Saura’s Musical Hybrids with Live Feed The Camera as a Social Catalyst
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1