Study on the Characteristics of Feather Developing Pattern and Morphology in Early- and Late-Feathering Korean Native Chickens

M. Bang, E. Cho, C. Cho, S. Sohn
{"title":"Study on the Characteristics of Feather Developing Pattern and Morphology in Early- and Late-Feathering Korean Native Chickens","authors":"M. Bang, E. Cho, C. Cho, S. Sohn","doi":"10.5536/kjps.2018.45.3.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chicken feathers could be classified into early-feathering (EF) and late-feathering (LF) depending on the development and patterns of the wing and tail feathers. Currently, feather-sexing is a widely used chick sexing method in the industry. This study was carried out to suggest the method of classifying of EF and LF chicks to establish auto-sexing Korean native chicken (KNC) strains. The development and morphology of wing feathers and tail feathers in 856 KNCs from hatching to 55-days old were analyzed to classify EF and LF chicks. We also performed PCR analysis using K-specific gene primers to confirm the agreement between the phenotypes and genotypes of EF and LF chickens. In the results, the EF chicks had long primaries and coverts, and there was a significant difference in length between primaries and coverts. The LF chicks had shorter primaries and coverts than the EF chicks, and showed little difference in the length between primaries and coverts. LF chicks could be classified into four groups: LF-Less, LF-Scant, LF-Equal and LF-Reverse according to their wing feather patterns. EF chicks had 1.5 times longer primaries than LF chicks until they were 15-days old, but the lengths were almost the same at 50-days old. The tail feathers of the EF chicks were apparent at 5-days old, but those of the LF chicks were short and indefinite at that time. When EF and LF chicks were classified by the length of primaries being more or less than 9 mm, the classification accuracies for EF and LF chicks were 96.2% and 85.4%, respectively, compared to the PCR results. In conclusion, juvenile EF and LF KNC showed distinct differences in feather development and morphology, and could be easily distinguished at one day-old. (","PeriodicalId":17845,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Poultry Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2018.45.3.155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Chicken feathers could be classified into early-feathering (EF) and late-feathering (LF) depending on the development and patterns of the wing and tail feathers. Currently, feather-sexing is a widely used chick sexing method in the industry. This study was carried out to suggest the method of classifying of EF and LF chicks to establish auto-sexing Korean native chicken (KNC) strains. The development and morphology of wing feathers and tail feathers in 856 KNCs from hatching to 55-days old were analyzed to classify EF and LF chicks. We also performed PCR analysis using K-specific gene primers to confirm the agreement between the phenotypes and genotypes of EF and LF chickens. In the results, the EF chicks had long primaries and coverts, and there was a significant difference in length between primaries and coverts. The LF chicks had shorter primaries and coverts than the EF chicks, and showed little difference in the length between primaries and coverts. LF chicks could be classified into four groups: LF-Less, LF-Scant, LF-Equal and LF-Reverse according to their wing feather patterns. EF chicks had 1.5 times longer primaries than LF chicks until they were 15-days old, but the lengths were almost the same at 50-days old. The tail feathers of the EF chicks were apparent at 5-days old, but those of the LF chicks were short and indefinite at that time. When EF and LF chicks were classified by the length of primaries being more or less than 9 mm, the classification accuracies for EF and LF chicks were 96.2% and 85.4%, respectively, compared to the PCR results. In conclusion, juvenile EF and LF KNC showed distinct differences in feather development and morphology, and could be easily distinguished at one day-old. (
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国土鸡早、晚羽毛发育模式及形态特征的研究
根据羽翼和尾羽的发育和形态,鸡毛可分为早羽化和晚羽化。目前,羽毛性别鉴定是业界广泛使用的小鸡性别鉴定方法。本研究提出了EF鸡和LF鸡的分类方法,以建立韩国地方鸡(KNC)的自性别菌株。对856只KNCs从孵化到55日龄的翅羽和尾羽的发育和形态进行了分析,对EF和LF雏鸡进行了分类。我们还利用k特异性基因引物进行了PCR分析,以证实EF鸡和LF鸡的表型和基因型之间的一致性。结果表明:EF雏鸡初生和复生体长,初生和复生体长差异显著;低龄雏鸡的初生叶和转生叶长度均较低龄雏鸡短,初生叶和转生叶长度差异不大。根据翅羽特征,可将羽化雏鸡分为少羽化、少羽化、等羽化和反羽化4类。在15日龄之前,EF鸡的初生期长度是LF鸡的1.5倍,但在50日龄时,EF鸡的初生期长度几乎相同。EF鸡的尾羽在5日龄时就很明显,而LF鸡的尾羽较短且不明确。以初生叶长度大于或小于9 mm为分类标准,EF和LF的分类准确率分别为96.2%和85.4%。综上所述,幼鸟EF和LF KNC在羽毛发育和形态上有明显的差异,在1日龄时就可以很容易地区分。(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Production Performance of Korean Native Chickens for amgye Chicken Production Effects of Crude Protein and Phytase in the Diet on Growth Performance and Excretion Contents of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Broiler Chicks Farm Survey on Eggshell Quality and Egg Vitamin D3 Contents in Laying Hens Fed Vitamin D3-enriched Diets Overcoming Ethical Conflicts and Dilemmas in Farm Animal Welfare: Investigation of Correlation between Ethical Awareness Level and Compliance with Animal Welfare-Related Regulations in Korean Layer Farms Effects of Probiotics on Antioxidant Biochemical Parameters and Antioxidant Enzymes in the Blood, Intestinal Mucosal Tissues and Liver of Broiler Chicks under High Ambient Temperature Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1