Looking the other way: how ideology influences perceptions of sexual harassment

IF 2 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE European Journal of Politics and Gender Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1332/251510821x16445951244136
Claire M. Gothreau, Clarisse Warren, Stephen P. Schneider
{"title":"Looking the other way: how ideology influences perceptions of sexual harassment","authors":"Claire M. Gothreau, Clarisse Warren, Stephen P. Schneider","doi":"10.1332/251510821x16445951244136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little research has systematically examined the relationship between ideology and perceptions of sexual harassment. Recognising differences in the way in which sexual harassment and assault were discussed on political programming and social media by partisans, we posed the following questions: (1) ‘Is there an ideological difference in perceptions of observed sexual harassment?’; and (2) ‘Is there also an ideological difference in perceptions of personally experienced sexual harassment?’ Using data from two studies, we find that conservatives are less likely than liberals to perceive and label both ambiguous and unambiguous situations as sexual harassment. Our third study – a survey of adult women – demonstrates that compared to liberal women, conservative women report significantly fewer instances of personally experienced gender discrimination and sexual harassment than liberal women. These results indicate that both observed and lived experiences of sexual harassment are linked to one’s ideological belief structures.Key messagesConservatives are less likely than liberals to perceive and label both ambiguous and unambiguous workplace scenarios as sexual harassment.Conservative women report significantly fewer instances of sexual harassment and gender discrimination than liberal women.These findings have broad implications for policy support and political attitudes about gender discrimination and harassment.","PeriodicalId":36315,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821x16445951244136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Little research has systematically examined the relationship between ideology and perceptions of sexual harassment. Recognising differences in the way in which sexual harassment and assault were discussed on political programming and social media by partisans, we posed the following questions: (1) ‘Is there an ideological difference in perceptions of observed sexual harassment?’; and (2) ‘Is there also an ideological difference in perceptions of personally experienced sexual harassment?’ Using data from two studies, we find that conservatives are less likely than liberals to perceive and label both ambiguous and unambiguous situations as sexual harassment. Our third study – a survey of adult women – demonstrates that compared to liberal women, conservative women report significantly fewer instances of personally experienced gender discrimination and sexual harassment than liberal women. These results indicate that both observed and lived experiences of sexual harassment are linked to one’s ideological belief structures.Key messagesConservatives are less likely than liberals to perceive and label both ambiguous and unambiguous workplace scenarios as sexual harassment.Conservative women report significantly fewer instances of sexual harassment and gender discrimination than liberal women.These findings have broad implications for policy support and political attitudes about gender discrimination and harassment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从另一个角度看:意识形态如何影响人们对性骚扰的看法
很少有研究系统地考察意识形态和对性骚扰的看法之间的关系。认识到党派人士在政治节目和社交媒体上讨论性骚扰和性侵犯的方式存在差异,我们提出了以下问题:(1)“对观察到的性骚扰的看法是否存在意识形态差异?”;(2)“对个人经历的性骚扰的看法是否也存在意识形态差异?”“根据两项研究的数据,我们发现保守派比自由派更不可能将模棱两可和明确的情况视为性骚扰。”我们的第三项研究——一项对成年女性的调查——表明,与自由派女性相比,保守派女性报告的个人经历的性别歧视和性骚扰事件明显少于自由派女性。这些结果表明,性骚扰的观察和生活经历都与一个人的意识形态信仰结构有关。关键信息与自由主义者相比,保守派不太可能将模棱两可和明确的工作场所场景视为性骚扰。保守派女性报告的性骚扰和性别歧视事件明显少于自由派女性。这些发现对有关性别歧视和骚扰的政策支持和政治态度具有广泛的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Politics and Gender
European Journal of Politics and Gender Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Translating difference: whiteness, racialisation and queer migration in Berlin Shifting equality from the margins: the Common European Asylum System and the making of trans rights in the European Union Translation as a cultural tool for mediating conflict in queer and feminist grassroots democratic coalitions in Denmark, Germany and Sweden Women’s issues, critical actors and the media: substantive representation of women and gendered media coverage in South Korea How anti-gender and gendered imagery translate the Great Replacement conspiracy theory in online far-right platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1