Pandemic projections from Moscow: The status quo reinvisioned (but not quite enough)

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE New Perspectives Pub Date : 2020-09-10 DOI:10.1177/2336825x20955129
M. Kimmage
{"title":"Pandemic projections from Moscow: The status quo reinvisioned (but not quite enough)","authors":"M. Kimmage","doi":"10.1177/2336825x20955129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Written in the shadow of the COVID crisis that began late in 2019 and has transformed international politics in 2020, the IMEMO’s 2020 Forecast furnishes valuable insight into global affairs and into the strategic agenda as it is being set in Moscow. It does an admirable job of integrating a global pandemic, which is wreaking havoc in real time, into longer term projections about global order. Where it concerns issues of public health and political upheaval, the Forecast is persuasive: it alleges a widening gap between political elites (in many countries) and the populations they are trying to govern. The Forecast misses a few important political trends, however. Of these, the most important is an accelerating consolidation of the post-Brexit European Union (EU). Should this continue, transatlantic relations could deepen, whereas Russia and China might find themselves confronting new challenges. If anything, the IMEMO Forecast does not stray far enough—intellectually—from the pre-COVID status quo. The Forecast assumes little change in Russia-EU relations, almost no change in US-Russian relations and closer linking together of Russia and China. It does not emphasize Russian agency in any of these three areas but instead roots the international situation in slow-moving structural processes: the alignment of interests between Russia and China, the possibility of an incipient ‘‘pragmatism’’ in the Kremlin’s relationship with Europe (broadly construed), and an intractable parting of the ways between the United States and Russia. The COVID crisis is understood, in this Forecast, as an impetus to trends that were apparent in 2019 and before. Some speculation is offered about ‘‘black swans’’—in particular those that might arise from global warming—and the stress these would put on the political order around the globe. In many different regions, the Forecast envisions elites struggling to hang on and a restless, younger generation eager to make its claim on political power.","PeriodicalId":42556,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825x20955129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Written in the shadow of the COVID crisis that began late in 2019 and has transformed international politics in 2020, the IMEMO’s 2020 Forecast furnishes valuable insight into global affairs and into the strategic agenda as it is being set in Moscow. It does an admirable job of integrating a global pandemic, which is wreaking havoc in real time, into longer term projections about global order. Where it concerns issues of public health and political upheaval, the Forecast is persuasive: it alleges a widening gap between political elites (in many countries) and the populations they are trying to govern. The Forecast misses a few important political trends, however. Of these, the most important is an accelerating consolidation of the post-Brexit European Union (EU). Should this continue, transatlantic relations could deepen, whereas Russia and China might find themselves confronting new challenges. If anything, the IMEMO Forecast does not stray far enough—intellectually—from the pre-COVID status quo. The Forecast assumes little change in Russia-EU relations, almost no change in US-Russian relations and closer linking together of Russia and China. It does not emphasize Russian agency in any of these three areas but instead roots the international situation in slow-moving structural processes: the alignment of interests between Russia and China, the possibility of an incipient ‘‘pragmatism’’ in the Kremlin’s relationship with Europe (broadly construed), and an intractable parting of the ways between the United States and Russia. The COVID crisis is understood, in this Forecast, as an impetus to trends that were apparent in 2019 and before. Some speculation is offered about ‘‘black swans’’—in particular those that might arise from global warming—and the stress these would put on the political order around the globe. In many different regions, the Forecast envisions elites struggling to hang on and a restless, younger generation eager to make its claim on political power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自莫斯科的流行病预测:重新审视现状(但还不够)
国际气象组织的《2020年预测》是在2019年底开始并在2020年改变了国际政治的新冠肺炎危机的阴影下编写的,它为全球事务和莫斯科正在制定的战略议程提供了宝贵的见解。它做了一项令人钦佩的工作,将一场正在实时造成严重破坏的全球流行病纳入了对全球秩序的长期预测。在涉及公共卫生和政治动荡的问题上,《预测》是有说服力的:它声称政治精英(在许多国家)和他们试图治理的人口之间的差距正在扩大。然而,《预测》忽略了一些重要的政治趋势。其中,最重要的是英国脱欧后欧盟(EU)的加速整合。如果这种情况继续下去,跨大西洋关系可能会加深,而俄罗斯和中国可能会发现自己面临新的挑战。如果说有什么不同的话,那就是IMEMO的预测在智力上与covid - 19前的现状相差不够远。《预测》假设俄欧关系变化不大,美俄关系几乎没有变化,俄中关系更加紧密。它没有强调俄罗斯在这三个领域中的任何一个方面的作用,而是将国际形势根植于缓慢移动的结构性进程:俄罗斯和中国之间的利益一致,克里姆林宫与欧洲关系中出现“实用主义”的可能性(广义上的解释),以及美国和俄罗斯之间难以处理的分道而行。在本预测中,COVID危机被理解为推动了2019年及之前明显的趋势。一些关于“黑天鹅”的猜测——特别是那些可能由全球变暖引起的——以及它们将给全球政治秩序带来的压力。《预测》预测,在许多不同的地区,精英们努力坚持下去,而焦躁不安的年轻一代渴望获得政治权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Perspectives
New Perspectives POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: New Perspectives is an academic journal that seeks to provide interdisciplinary insight into the politics and international relations of Central and Eastern Europe. New Perspectives is published by the Institute of International Relations Prague.
期刊最新文献
The spatial repercussions of Russia’s war in Ukraine: Region(alism)s, borders, insecurities Understanding the grain deal and its pitfalls: Going beyond food security? The grammars of globalisation and the languages of regionalism: The war in Ukraine as a milestone and a test Polling to vaccination stations: Brexit’s influence on immunisation uptake Russian war, Estonian exceptions: Sovereignty, governmentality, biopolitics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1