The test/retest reliability of physical performance measures in osteoarthritis patients

F. Humby, Alice J. Hughes, A. Jawad
{"title":"The test/retest reliability of physical performance measures in osteoarthritis patients","authors":"F. Humby, Alice J. Hughes, A. Jawad","doi":"10.4172/1758-4272.1000160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: There is limited data examining the reliability and consistency of objective measures of osteoarthritis (OA) function. Therefore the aim of this study was to assess their test/retest reliability. Methods: 21 postmenopausal women over the age of 50 diagnosed with bilateral knee OA were recruited from a single centre. Endpoints assessed included time to walk 20 m, 40 m, ascend and descend 11 stairs, pain scores, standard WOMAC questionnaires and range of motion of the knee with assessments repeated at a follow up visit. Results: Time to walk 20 m, 40 m, and climb and descend stairs and total WOMAC scores between the two visits was highly reliable. There was no reliability for the range of motion of the knee. Conclusions: The high degree of reliability for the endpoints of walking and stair climbing within patients and across visits supports the use of these as outcome measures within clinical trials of OA.","PeriodicalId":13740,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","volume":"13 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1758-4272.1000160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: There is limited data examining the reliability and consistency of objective measures of osteoarthritis (OA) function. Therefore the aim of this study was to assess their test/retest reliability. Methods: 21 postmenopausal women over the age of 50 diagnosed with bilateral knee OA were recruited from a single centre. Endpoints assessed included time to walk 20 m, 40 m, ascend and descend 11 stairs, pain scores, standard WOMAC questionnaires and range of motion of the knee with assessments repeated at a follow up visit. Results: Time to walk 20 m, 40 m, and climb and descend stairs and total WOMAC scores between the two visits was highly reliable. There was no reliability for the range of motion of the knee. Conclusions: The high degree of reliability for the endpoints of walking and stair climbing within patients and across visits supports the use of these as outcome measures within clinical trials of OA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨关节炎患者体能测试的测试/重测信度
目的:检测骨关节炎(OA)功能客观测量的可靠性和一致性的数据有限。因此,本研究的目的是评估他们的测试/重测信度。方法:从单一中心招募21名50岁以上诊断为双侧膝关节炎的绝经后妇女。评估的终点包括步行20米、40米、上下11级楼梯的时间、疼痛评分、标准WOMAC问卷和膝关节活动范围,并在随访中重复评估。结果:两次访间步行20 m、40 m、爬楼梯和下楼梯时间及WOMAC总分具有高信度。对于膝关节的活动范围没有可靠性。结论:患者步行和爬楼梯的终点和跨访问的高度可靠性支持将这些作为OA临床试验的结果测量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Severe coronal re-infection and issuesof mechanisms, monitoring and therapy Treatment patterns and costs ofpatients with ankylosing spondylitisinitiating biologic therapy in taiwan ??? apopulation-based analysis Effectiveness of adalimumab versus infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A randomized double blinded clinical trial Synovitis with pitting edema as the presenting manifestation of antisynthetase syndrome Demographic, clinical, and serological features of Iraqi patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of 470 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1