Designing for participatory governance: assessing capabilities and toolkits in public service delivery

S. V. D. Graaf, Carina Veeckman
{"title":"Designing for participatory governance: assessing capabilities and toolkits in public service delivery","authors":"S. V. D. Graaf, Carina Veeckman","doi":"10.1108/INFO-07-2014-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this study is yield insight into how cities can optimize citizen involvement in the co-development of citizen services by providing the rights tools, knowledge and resources. Design/methodology/approach – By conducting a case study analysis of the city of Ghent, this study investigates how users are engaged in the development of mobile applications on a city-hosted platform. Findings – Findings show that public service delivery, related to the urban space, can be co-designed between the city and its citizens, if different toolkits aligned with the specific capacities and skills of the citizens are provided. Research limitations/implications – Data were collected between August 2012 and December 2013. Some preliminary findings are presented on the (design of the) dynamic co-creation ecosystem and the citizens’ capacities to participate on the city-hosted platform. In addition, while the examination is still ongoing some insights can be offered in the learning dynamics underpinning how the cities are setting up such a bottom-up process and how local participation for different citizen groups can be optimized in the context of design capabilities and the design space. Originality/value – This study yields relevant insights for policymakers, city administrations, as well as Living Lab practitioners into how public service delivery, supported by an inclusive participatory governance by design framework at the local level, can be co-designed between the city and citizens, if different toolkits aligned with the specific capacities and skills of the users are provided. By providing tailored tools, even ordinary citizens can take a much more active role in the development and appropriation of their urban space and generate solutions from which both the city and citizens’ everyday life can possibly benefit.","PeriodicalId":88488,"journal":{"name":"Fruhneuzeit-Info","volume":"55 1","pages":"74-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fruhneuzeit-Info","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/INFO-07-2014-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is yield insight into how cities can optimize citizen involvement in the co-development of citizen services by providing the rights tools, knowledge and resources. Design/methodology/approach – By conducting a case study analysis of the city of Ghent, this study investigates how users are engaged in the development of mobile applications on a city-hosted platform. Findings – Findings show that public service delivery, related to the urban space, can be co-designed between the city and its citizens, if different toolkits aligned with the specific capacities and skills of the citizens are provided. Research limitations/implications – Data were collected between August 2012 and December 2013. Some preliminary findings are presented on the (design of the) dynamic co-creation ecosystem and the citizens’ capacities to participate on the city-hosted platform. In addition, while the examination is still ongoing some insights can be offered in the learning dynamics underpinning how the cities are setting up such a bottom-up process and how local participation for different citizen groups can be optimized in the context of design capabilities and the design space. Originality/value – This study yields relevant insights for policymakers, city administrations, as well as Living Lab practitioners into how public service delivery, supported by an inclusive participatory governance by design framework at the local level, can be co-designed between the city and citizens, if different toolkits aligned with the specific capacities and skills of the users are provided. By providing tailored tools, even ordinary citizens can take a much more active role in the development and appropriation of their urban space and generate solutions from which both the city and citizens’ everyday life can possibly benefit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与式治理设计:评估公共服务提供的能力和工具包
目的-本研究的目的是深入了解城市如何通过提供权利工具、知识和资源来优化公民参与公民服务的共同发展。设计/方法/方法——通过对根特市的案例研究分析,本研究调查了用户如何在城市托管平台上参与移动应用程序的开发。调查结果-调查结果表明,如果提供与公民的具体能力和技能相一致的不同工具包,则可以在城市和公民之间共同设计与城市空间相关的公共服务。研究局限性/启示-数据收集于2012年8月至2013年12月。关于动态共同创造生态系统的(设计)和公民参与城市托管平台的能力,提出了一些初步的发现。此外,虽然研究仍在进行中,但可以在学习动态方面提供一些见解,以支持城市如何建立这种自下而上的过程,以及如何在设计能力和设计空间的背景下优化不同公民群体的本地参与。原创性/价值-本研究为政策制定者、城市管理部门以及生活实验室从业者提供了相关见解,说明如果提供与用户的具体能力和技能相一致的不同工具包,如何在地方层面的包容性参与性治理框架的支持下,在城市和公民之间共同设计公共服务。通过提供量身定制的工具,即使是普通市民也可以在城市空间的开发和占用中发挥更积极的作用,并产生城市和市民日常生活都可能受益的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Another breach in the wall: copyright territoriality in Europe and its progressive erosion on the grounds of competition law Content creation and distribution in the digital single market User generated content – users, community of users and firms: toward new sources of co-innovation? Shrinking core? Exploring the differential agenda setting power of traditional and personalized news media Copyright (and) Culture: the governance of audiovisual archives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1