The First International Guideline for Oxytocin Safely Decreased Oxytocin Amount During Cesarean Section: A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis

Takeshi Murouchi
{"title":"The First International Guideline for Oxytocin Safely Decreased Oxytocin Amount During Cesarean Section: A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Takeshi Murouchi","doi":"10.31487/j.acr.2021.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: It is routine to administer oxytocin following delivery of the neonate during cesarean section. \nHowever, there are many kinds of administration methods. Heesen et al. published an international \nconsensus statement in 2019 on the use of uterotonic agents, including oxytocin during cesarean section \n[1]. Our institution adapted the guideline-based oxytocin infusion method. We verified the validity of the \nnew approach after one year.\nMethods: A single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent cesarean section \nwith a new protocol or the conventional manner from November 2019 to December 2020 was conducted. \nThe primary endpoint was a significant difference in the amount of intraoperative hemorrhage and the \ntotal oxytocin amount. Secondary endpoints included differences in the incidence of intraoperative \ncomplications.\nResults: The study included 174 patients: 66 in the new protocol group and 108 in the conventional \ngroup. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups for oxytocin amount (new \nprotocol 4.2 [3.2-5.9] vs. conventional 5.0 [5.0-10] IU, p<0.01) with equivalent intraoperative \nhemorrhages (new protocol 558 [337-963] vs. conventional 683 [484-1012] g, p=0.08). There was no \nsignificant difference in the incidence of nausea.\nConclusion: The new guideline-based oxytocin administration safely decreased the intraoperative \noxytocin amount in our institution.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.acr.2021.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: It is routine to administer oxytocin following delivery of the neonate during cesarean section. However, there are many kinds of administration methods. Heesen et al. published an international consensus statement in 2019 on the use of uterotonic agents, including oxytocin during cesarean section [1]. Our institution adapted the guideline-based oxytocin infusion method. We verified the validity of the new approach after one year. Methods: A single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent cesarean section with a new protocol or the conventional manner from November 2019 to December 2020 was conducted. The primary endpoint was a significant difference in the amount of intraoperative hemorrhage and the total oxytocin amount. Secondary endpoints included differences in the incidence of intraoperative complications. Results: The study included 174 patients: 66 in the new protocol group and 108 in the conventional group. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups for oxytocin amount (new protocol 4.2 [3.2-5.9] vs. conventional 5.0 [5.0-10] IU, p<0.01) with equivalent intraoperative hemorrhages (new protocol 558 [337-963] vs. conventional 683 [484-1012] g, p=0.08). There was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea. Conclusion: The new guideline-based oxytocin administration safely decreased the intraoperative oxytocin amount in our institution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖宫产术中安全降低催产素量的首个国际指南:一项单机构回顾性分析
目的:剖宫产术中常规使用催产素。然而,管理方法有很多种。Heesen等人于2019年发表了一份关于剖宫产术中使用包括催产素在内的子宫强直药物的国际共识声明[1]。我们的机构采用了基于指南的催产素输注方法。一年后,我们验证了新方法的有效性。方法:对2019年11月至2020年12月连续采用新方案或常规方式剖宫产术的患者进行单中心回顾性研究。主要终点是术中出血量和催产素总量的显著差异。次要终点包括术中并发症发生率的差异。结果:研究纳入174例患者:新方案组66例,常规组108例。两组催产素用量(新方案4.2 [3.2-5.9]vs常规方案5.0 [5.0-10]IU, p<0.01)与术中出血量相等(新方案558 [337-963]vs常规方案683 [484-1012]g, p=0.08),差异有统计学意义。恶心发生率无显著差异。结论:基于新指南的催产素给药能安全降低我院术中催产素的用量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Sutured on the Pulmonary Trunk and Relevant Clinical Consequences Study in a Simulated Scenario of the Influence of Training and Personality in the Resolution of Critical Situations in Anaesthesiology Residents Pulmonary Thrombosis in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Theory, Evidence, and Clinical Relevance to Resource-Limited Settings Management of Cerebropontine Angle Tumors on Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Facilitating Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Retrospective Observational Study Efficacy of Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block as Analgesic Modality in Clavicle Fractures: Exploring New Horizons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1