{"title":"Channeling effect and energy contamination evaluations of B-based beam-line ULE implants - Tools and recipe set-up dependence","authors":"S. Qin, Y. Hu, A. Mcteer","doi":"10.1109/IIT.2014.6939958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We extensively investigate tool and recipe set-up dependence of the ultra-shallow junctions (USJ) doped by the boron-based ultra-low energy (ULE) beam-line (BL) implants. Recipes set-up includes different tools, energies, implant temperatures, and deceleration ratios. Channeling effect and energy contamination issues are de-coupled by drift and deceleration mode implants. A channeling effect factor (CEF) is defined and quantified. Channeling effect is found to be a major factor causing deeper profiles and long tails (xj). Channeling effect gets worse when the implant energy is reduced due to less self-PAI effect (with less damage). Low temperature (-100 °C) implant does not effectively reduce channeling effect. Deceleration mode implant increases tail (xj) due to energy contamination as a secondary order effect.","PeriodicalId":6548,"journal":{"name":"2014 20th International Conference on Ion Implantation Technology (IIT)","volume":"106 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 20th International Conference on Ion Implantation Technology (IIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIT.2014.6939958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
We extensively investigate tool and recipe set-up dependence of the ultra-shallow junctions (USJ) doped by the boron-based ultra-low energy (ULE) beam-line (BL) implants. Recipes set-up includes different tools, energies, implant temperatures, and deceleration ratios. Channeling effect and energy contamination issues are de-coupled by drift and deceleration mode implants. A channeling effect factor (CEF) is defined and quantified. Channeling effect is found to be a major factor causing deeper profiles and long tails (xj). Channeling effect gets worse when the implant energy is reduced due to less self-PAI effect (with less damage). Low temperature (-100 °C) implant does not effectively reduce channeling effect. Deceleration mode implant increases tail (xj) due to energy contamination as a secondary order effect.