Standard Contract on Banking Sector: Regulation and Description in Internal Banking Regulations

Desak Putu Dewi Kasih, Putu Devi Yustitia Utami
{"title":"Standard Contract on Banking Sector: Regulation and Description in Internal Banking Regulations","authors":"Desak Putu Dewi Kasih, Putu Devi Yustitia Utami","doi":"10.24843/jmhu.2021.v10.i02.p05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the regulations regarding standard contracts in the banking sector after the existence of the authority of the Otoritas Jasa keuangan, to find out the legal consequences of violations of the provisions of standard contracts carried out by banking financial services and to determine efforts to prevent violations of standard contracts by banking financial services. This is normative legal research with with statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that the regulation regarding the standard contract after the existence of the OJK as a financial service consumer protection agency is regulated through the Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) No.1/POJK.07/2013 concerning Consumer Protection in the Financial Services Sector and in the Financial Services Authority Circular Letter (SEOJK) No. 13 /SEOJK.07 / 2014 regarding the Standard contract. The legal consequences of violating the provisions of the standard contract are not regulated in the POJK and the SEOJK. When it compared with the provisions of article 18 paragraph (3) of the Consumer Protection Law which explicitly states that violations of article 18 paragraphs (1) and (2) result in standard clauses being null and void, POJK and SEOJK only require financial service actors to make action plan, hence it is deemed to have no clear legal consequences. One of the efforts that must be made by banking financial service actors to prevent violations of the provisions of the standard contract is by making standard contract regulations independently and elaborating them in the internal banking regulations.","PeriodicalId":30763,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2021.v10.i02.p05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to determine the regulations regarding standard contracts in the banking sector after the existence of the authority of the Otoritas Jasa keuangan, to find out the legal consequences of violations of the provisions of standard contracts carried out by banking financial services and to determine efforts to prevent violations of standard contracts by banking financial services. This is normative legal research with with statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that the regulation regarding the standard contract after the existence of the OJK as a financial service consumer protection agency is regulated through the Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) No.1/POJK.07/2013 concerning Consumer Protection in the Financial Services Sector and in the Financial Services Authority Circular Letter (SEOJK) No. 13 /SEOJK.07 / 2014 regarding the Standard contract. The legal consequences of violating the provisions of the standard contract are not regulated in the POJK and the SEOJK. When it compared with the provisions of article 18 paragraph (3) of the Consumer Protection Law which explicitly states that violations of article 18 paragraphs (1) and (2) result in standard clauses being null and void, POJK and SEOJK only require financial service actors to make action plan, hence it is deemed to have no clear legal consequences. One of the efforts that must be made by banking financial service actors to prevent violations of the provisions of the standard contract is by making standard contract regulations independently and elaborating them in the internal banking regulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行业标准合同:银行业内部监管中的规制与描述
本研究旨在确定在Otoritas Jasa keuangan权威存在后银行业标准合同的规定,找出违反银行金融服务执行标准合同规定的法律后果,并确定努力防止银行金融服务违反标准合同。这是规范性的法律研究,有成文法的方法和概念的方法。结果表明,OJK作为金融服务消费者保护机构存在后对标准合同的监管是通过金融服务管理局条例(POJK) No.1/POJK进行的。07/2013关于金融服务行业的消费者保护及金融服务管理局通函(SEOJK)第13 /SEOJK号。7 / 2014关于标准合同。违反标准合同条款的法律后果在POJK和SEOJK中没有规定。与《消费者保护法》第18条第(3)项明确规定违反第18条第(1)项和第(2)项的标准条款无效相比,POJK和SEOJK只要求金融服务主体制定行动计划,因此被认为没有明确的法律后果。为防止违反标准合同的规定,银行金融服务行为者必须作出的努力之一是独立制定标准合同条例,并在银行内部条例中加以详细说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementasi Pengelolaan Tanah di Desa Adat Kerobokan untuk Kegiatan Industri Pariwisata Institutional Strengthening of Village-Owned Enterprise Legal Entities as a Manifestation of Village Sustainable Development Goals Pengaturan Manipulasi Pasar dalam Pasar Modal : Studi Komparasi Pengaturan Beberapa Negara Karakteristik Akad Mukhabarah bil Mudharabah Pada Kemitraan Pertanian Tebu Customary Village Authority in Coastal Area Management : an Ius Constituendum Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1