Mass Character and “Massovization” in the Early Soviet Literary Process

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-4-10-33
D. Moskovskaya, N.Yu. Bakshaeva, O. Romanova
{"title":"Mass Character and “Massovization” in the Early Soviet Literary Process","authors":"D. Moskovskaya, N.Yu. Bakshaeva, O. Romanova","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-4-10-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theorizing the concept of Soviet literature is associated with the understanding that in the 1920s the literary process is undergoing massive changes. The mass writer undergoes ideological molding. The “order for inspiration” after 1926 does not come from the financial market, but from the authorities. But regardless of the instance that actualized the order, the fusion of literature with power gives rise to “paraliterature,” which typologically equates the “tabloid” generated by financial mechanisms with mass custom-made thematic literature. An appeal to the motives of the behavior of participants in the early Soviet literary process, the study of which is provided by the archives of proletarian writers’ unions, reveals the possibility of a sociological and literary interpretation in the concept of a Soviet writer. In the sociological perspective, the Soviet writer belongs to the market of ideological values, and the referential content of this concept, proposed by E.A. Dobrenko and M.O. Chudakova — “mass graphomania” or subordination to the doctrine of socialist realism — corresponds to the social practice of the 1920s–1930s. In the literary perspective, the writer appears as the author, “a structure acting in the space of the work.” The immanent perspective liberates the Soviet writer from the status of “Sovietness” and makes it possible to attribute his works to the achievements of world literature.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Litterarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-4-10-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Theorizing the concept of Soviet literature is associated with the understanding that in the 1920s the literary process is undergoing massive changes. The mass writer undergoes ideological molding. The “order for inspiration” after 1926 does not come from the financial market, but from the authorities. But regardless of the instance that actualized the order, the fusion of literature with power gives rise to “paraliterature,” which typologically equates the “tabloid” generated by financial mechanisms with mass custom-made thematic literature. An appeal to the motives of the behavior of participants in the early Soviet literary process, the study of which is provided by the archives of proletarian writers’ unions, reveals the possibility of a sociological and literary interpretation in the concept of a Soviet writer. In the sociological perspective, the Soviet writer belongs to the market of ideological values, and the referential content of this concept, proposed by E.A. Dobrenko and M.O. Chudakova — “mass graphomania” or subordination to the doctrine of socialist realism — corresponds to the social practice of the 1920s–1930s. In the literary perspective, the writer appears as the author, “a structure acting in the space of the work.” The immanent perspective liberates the Soviet writer from the status of “Sovietness” and makes it possible to attribute his works to the achievements of world literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏联早期文学进程中的群众性与“群众化”
对苏联文学概念的理论化与对20世纪20年代文学进程发生巨大变化的认识有关。大众作家经历了思想的塑造。1926年之后的“灵感指令”不是来自金融市场,而是来自当局。但是,不管实现这种秩序的实例是什么,文学与权力的融合产生了“副文学”,它在类型学上将由金融机制产生的“小报”等同于大规模定制的主题文学。无产阶级作家联盟的档案提供了对早期苏联文学进程参与者行为动机的研究,揭示了苏联作家概念中社会学和文学解释的可能性。在社会学视野中,苏联作家属于意识形态价值市场,多布伦科和丘达科娃提出的这一概念的指称内容——“大众书写狂”或从属于社会主义现实主义学说——与20世纪二三十年代的社会实践相对应。从文学的角度来看,作家以作者的身份出现,是“一个在作品空间中活动的结构”。内在视角将苏联作家从“苏维埃性”的地位中解放出来,使其作品有可能成为世界文学成就的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Litterarum
Studia Litterarum LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Specific Features of Forming French-Language Literatures of Sub-Saharan Africa as the Regional Typological Commonness Esenin’s Poem “Us”: Materials for Historical and Literary Commentary Russian Chastushka (Ditties) vs Spanish Flamenco Verses: the Experience of Typological Comparison Genre and Style Structure of Expatriate Folklore Lyrics by Crimean Tatars (“The Song of Cool Water”) “Intertextuality” in the 12th Century: Marie de France and Chrétien de Troyes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1