Sonia Hines, John Wakerman, Timothy A Carey, Deborah Russell, John Humphreys
{"title":"Retention strategies and interventions for health workers in rural and remote areas: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Sonia Hines, John Wakerman, Timothy A Carey, Deborah Russell, John Humphreys","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the current review is to examine the association between exposure to strategies or interventions to retain health workers in rural and remote areas of high-income countries and improved retention rates.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Attracting and retaining sufficient healthcare staff to provide adequate services for residents of rural and remote areas is an international problem. High-income countries have specific challenges in staffing remote and rural areas; despite the majority of the population clustering in large cities, a significant number of communities are in rural, remote or frontier areas which may be perceived as less attractive locations in which to live and work.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will consider studies that include health workers in high-income countries where participants have been exposed to interventions, support measures or incentive programs to increase retention or workforce length of employment or reduce turnover for health workers in rural and remote areas. Analytical observational studies, case-control studies, analytical cross-sectional studies, descriptive observational study designs, and descriptive cross-sectional studies published from 2010 will be eligible for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will use the JBI methodology for reviews of risk and etiology. A range of databases will be searched. Two reviewers will screen, critically appraise eligible articles, and extract data from included studies. Data synthesis will be conducted, where feasible, with RevMan 5.3.5. A random effects model will be used to conduct meta-analyses. We will assess the certainty of the findings using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":43123,"journal":{"name":"Arthuriana","volume":"10 1","pages":"87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthuriana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the current review is to examine the association between exposure to strategies or interventions to retain health workers in rural and remote areas of high-income countries and improved retention rates.
Introduction: Attracting and retaining sufficient healthcare staff to provide adequate services for residents of rural and remote areas is an international problem. High-income countries have specific challenges in staffing remote and rural areas; despite the majority of the population clustering in large cities, a significant number of communities are in rural, remote or frontier areas which may be perceived as less attractive locations in which to live and work.
Inclusion criteria: The review will consider studies that include health workers in high-income countries where participants have been exposed to interventions, support measures or incentive programs to increase retention or workforce length of employment or reduce turnover for health workers in rural and remote areas. Analytical observational studies, case-control studies, analytical cross-sectional studies, descriptive observational study designs, and descriptive cross-sectional studies published from 2010 will be eligible for inclusion.
Methods: We will use the JBI methodology for reviews of risk and etiology. A range of databases will be searched. Two reviewers will screen, critically appraise eligible articles, and extract data from included studies. Data synthesis will be conducted, where feasible, with RevMan 5.3.5. A random effects model will be used to conduct meta-analyses. We will assess the certainty of the findings using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
期刊介绍:
Arthuriana publishes peer-reviewed, on-line analytical and bibliographical surveys of various Arthurian subjects. You can access these e-resources through this site. The review and evaluation processes for e-articles is identical to that for the print journal . Once accepted for publication, our surveys are supported and maintained by Professor Alan Lupack at the University of Rochester through the Camelot Project.