‘I, Who Used to Serve as Jupiter’s Lightning on Earth’: Geeraerdt Brandt’s De Veinzende Torquatus (1645), Providentially Assigned Stadtholders and the Politics of Rational Deception

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies Pub Date : 2019-05-08 DOI:10.1080/03096564.2019.1615761
T. Laureys
{"title":"‘I, Who Used to Serve as Jupiter’s Lightning on Earth’: Geeraerdt Brandt’s De Veinzende Torquatus (1645), Providentially Assigned Stadtholders and the Politics of Rational Deception","authors":"T. Laureys","doi":"10.1080/03096564.2019.1615761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article aims to show that Geeraerdt Brandt’s popular revenge tragedy De veinzende Torquatus (1645) engages with the political debates concerning the rightful succession of monarchs based on primogeniture, and – be it in a grotesque, even parodic way – the Calvinistic belief that the Dutch stadtholders were God’s providential instruments, assigned to guide His chosen people. Subsequently, I show that the play offers a confrontation between two conflicting conceptions of power. The play’s eponymous protagonist holds what I call an intellectual (idealistic) conception of power, in which man's rational faculty, including his capacity for rational deception, is all-decisive. This vision, though, clashes with the more physical (materialistic) conceptualization of power which Torquatus’s antagonist Noron upholds.","PeriodicalId":41997,"journal":{"name":"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"21 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03096564.2019.1615761","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article aims to show that Geeraerdt Brandt’s popular revenge tragedy De veinzende Torquatus (1645) engages with the political debates concerning the rightful succession of monarchs based on primogeniture, and – be it in a grotesque, even parodic way – the Calvinistic belief that the Dutch stadtholders were God’s providential instruments, assigned to guide His chosen people. Subsequently, I show that the play offers a confrontation between two conflicting conceptions of power. The play’s eponymous protagonist holds what I call an intellectual (idealistic) conception of power, in which man's rational faculty, including his capacity for rational deception, is all-decisive. This vision, though, clashes with the more physical (materialistic) conceptualization of power which Torquatus’s antagonist Noron upholds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《我,曾经是木星在地球上的闪电》:勃兰特的《德·维因岑德·托克图斯》(1645),《天意分配的税收人与理性欺骗的政治》
本文旨在展示勃兰特(Geeraerdt Brandt)的复仇悲剧De veinzende Torquatus(1645)与基于长子继承制的君主合法继承的政治辩论,以及加尔文主义的信仰,即荷兰执政官是上帝的天命工具,被指定来指导他的选民。随后,我指出,该剧提供了两种相互冲突的权力观念之间的对抗。该剧的同名主人公持有我称之为智力(理想主义)的权力观念,在这种观念中,人的理性能力,包括理性欺骗的能力,是决定性的。然而,这一观点与托尔奎图斯的对手诺伦所坚持的更物质(唯物主义)的权力概念相冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Peripheral Networks: Canon-Formation in the Nineteenth-Century Reception of Regionalist Writers Jean Crosnier and The Image of Amsterdam in L’Année Burlesque (1682) “The problem with all those teachers is that they are completely numb”: Representations of Teachers and Education in Recent Dutch Novels Two Peaks in a Barren Landscape: Turkish-Dutch Writers in the Netherlands Grand Larcenies: Translations and Imitations of Ten Dutch Poets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1