A systematic review of the water treatment sludge toxicity to terrestrial and aquatic biota: state of the art and management challenges

A. C. Bernegossi, B. Freitas, G. B. Castro, J. P. Marques, L. F. Trindade, M. R. de Lima e Silva, M. C. Felipe, A. P. Ogura
{"title":"A systematic review of the water treatment sludge toxicity to terrestrial and aquatic biota: state of the art and management challenges","authors":"A. C. Bernegossi, B. Freitas, G. B. Castro, J. P. Marques, L. F. Trindade, M. R. de Lima e Silva, M. C. Felipe, A. P. Ogura","doi":"10.1080/10934529.2022.2060021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Safe drinking water’ supply is an essential service and depends directly on the water treatment that produces water treatment sludge (WTS) as a product, whose final destination varies and remains a challenge. The ecotoxicity assessment of the WTS address the ecological implications of the WTS disposal but these information is still scarce in the literature. In this sense, we did a systematic review of the ecotoxicological studies on WTS using databases from six platforms. From the 785 papers recovered; 16 studies were eligible and showed the ecotoxicity assays’ applicability to evaluate the WTS. We discussed WTS ecotoxicity considering sample characterization; terrestrial and aquatic toxicity assays; and WTS challenges. WTS proved to be a highly heterogeneous matrix composed mainly of coagulant precipitates, including Al and Fe. Studies lack consensus concerning the most representative/sensitive species for evaluating WTS’ toxicity. Crustaceans were the most studied aquatic group, although algae species were more sensitive. Besides, soil ecotoxicity assessed only plant growth, and a single study used the earthworm. Even papers used bioassays to indicate the recycling WTS’ feasibility, there is a lack of specific legislation regarding the WTS reuse. Furthermore, are necessary a regulation for WTS management that involves an ecological risk assessment.","PeriodicalId":15733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","volume":"15 1 1","pages":"282 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2022.2060021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Safe drinking water’ supply is an essential service and depends directly on the water treatment that produces water treatment sludge (WTS) as a product, whose final destination varies and remains a challenge. The ecotoxicity assessment of the WTS address the ecological implications of the WTS disposal but these information is still scarce in the literature. In this sense, we did a systematic review of the ecotoxicological studies on WTS using databases from six platforms. From the 785 papers recovered; 16 studies were eligible and showed the ecotoxicity assays’ applicability to evaluate the WTS. We discussed WTS ecotoxicity considering sample characterization; terrestrial and aquatic toxicity assays; and WTS challenges. WTS proved to be a highly heterogeneous matrix composed mainly of coagulant precipitates, including Al and Fe. Studies lack consensus concerning the most representative/sensitive species for evaluating WTS’ toxicity. Crustaceans were the most studied aquatic group, although algae species were more sensitive. Besides, soil ecotoxicity assessed only plant growth, and a single study used the earthworm. Even papers used bioassays to indicate the recycling WTS’ feasibility, there is a lack of specific legislation regarding the WTS reuse. Furthermore, are necessary a regulation for WTS management that involves an ecological risk assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水处理污泥对陆生和水生生物的毒性的系统综述:现状和管理挑战
安全饮用水的供应是一项必不可少的服务,它直接依赖于水处理,而水处理污泥作为一种产品产生,其最终归宿是不同的,仍然是一个挑战。WTS的生态毒性评估解决了WTS处置的生态影响,但这些信息在文献中仍然很少。在这个意义上,我们利用六个平台的数据库对WTS的生态毒理学研究进行了系统的回顾。从回收的785篇论文中;16项研究符合条件,显示了生态毒性试验评价WTS的适用性。考虑样品表征,我们讨论了WTS的生态毒性;陆地和水生毒性测定;和WTS挑战。WTS是一种高度不均匀的基体,主要由混凝沉淀组成,包括Al和Fe。对于评价WTS毒性的最具代表性/最敏感的物种,研究缺乏共识。甲壳类是研究最多的水生类群,尽管藻类物种更敏感。此外,土壤生态毒性仅评估植物生长,而且有一项研究使用了蚯蚓。即使有论文使用生物测定法来表明回收WTS的可行性,也缺乏关于WTS再利用的具体立法。此外,有必要制定一个涉及生态风险评估的WTS管理条例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adsorption kinetics, isotherms, and selectivity of trihalomethanes and haloacetonitriles by granular activated carbon. Immobilization of HRP enzyme on polymeric microspheres and its use in decolourisation of organic dyes. Integration of down-flow hanging sponge reactor to oreochromis niloticus - Brassica oleracea aquaponics system. Photocatalytic degradation process of antibiotic sulfamethoxazole by ZnO in aquatic systems: a dynamic kinetic model based on contributions of OH radical, oxygenated radical intermediates and dissolved oxygen A novel and efficient voltammetric sensor for the simultaneous determination of alizarin red S and tartrazine by using poly(leucine) functionalized carbon paste electrode
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1