Experimental and numerical investigation on the hydraulic design criteria for a step-pool nature-like fishway

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Progress in Physical Geography-Earth and Environment Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI:10.1177/03091333231187619
S. T. Kalathil, V. Chandra
{"title":"Experimental and numerical investigation on the hydraulic design criteria for a step-pool nature-like fishway","authors":"S. T. Kalathil, V. Chandra","doi":"10.1177/03091333231187619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydraulic considerations specific for the design of step-pool nature-like fishways (NLFs) are limited to the body dimensions of the target species. Additional hydraulic criteria for flow depth, maximum values for each of pool depth, velocity, and turbulent kinetic energy in terms of the weir opening width and discharge can help design an optimum step-pool NLF. The present study developed design charts and rating curves based on numerical modeling using the computational fluid dynamics software FLOW-3D® HYDRO. Instantaneous velocity measurements on a 1:4 scaled physical model of a step-pool nature-like fishway designed as per the available design guidelines have been used to validate the numerical model. The hydrodynamics of the fishway with respect to the weir opening ratio b r (0.10, 0.25, 0.45, 0.65, and 1.00) and discharge Q (0.1–1.5 m3/s) was analyzed through numerical simulations on a prototype scale. The simulation results showed that the maximum flow velocity and the averaged velocity over the crest at b r = 0.10 and 0.25 are considerably lower than at b r > 0.25. The maximum turbulent kinetic energy and energy dissipation factors for the tested range of discharges were within recommended limits for b r = 0.10 and 0.25. The present study outcome in terms of the design charts and rating curves that illustrate the relationship between different variables can be used for an optimum design and ease in field implementation. In addition, the bed structure of the step-pool NLF presented in this study can be used to recreate full-scale or pilot models.","PeriodicalId":49659,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Physical Geography-Earth and Environment","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Physical Geography-Earth and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333231187619","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydraulic considerations specific for the design of step-pool nature-like fishways (NLFs) are limited to the body dimensions of the target species. Additional hydraulic criteria for flow depth, maximum values for each of pool depth, velocity, and turbulent kinetic energy in terms of the weir opening width and discharge can help design an optimum step-pool NLF. The present study developed design charts and rating curves based on numerical modeling using the computational fluid dynamics software FLOW-3D® HYDRO. Instantaneous velocity measurements on a 1:4 scaled physical model of a step-pool nature-like fishway designed as per the available design guidelines have been used to validate the numerical model. The hydrodynamics of the fishway with respect to the weir opening ratio b r (0.10, 0.25, 0.45, 0.65, and 1.00) and discharge Q (0.1–1.5 m3/s) was analyzed through numerical simulations on a prototype scale. The simulation results showed that the maximum flow velocity and the averaged velocity over the crest at b r = 0.10 and 0.25 are considerably lower than at b r > 0.25. The maximum turbulent kinetic energy and energy dissipation factors for the tested range of discharges were within recommended limits for b r = 0.10 and 0.25. The present study outcome in terms of the design charts and rating curves that illustrate the relationship between different variables can be used for an optimum design and ease in field implementation. In addition, the bed structure of the step-pool NLF presented in this study can be used to recreate full-scale or pilot models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阶梯池型自然鱼道水力设计准则的实验与数值研究
设计阶梯池类自然鱼道(NLFs)的水力考虑仅限于目标物种的身体尺寸。水流深度、池深、流速和湍流动能(堰口宽度和流量)的最大值等附加水力标准可以帮助设计最佳的阶梯池NLF。本研究利用计算流体动力学软件FLOW-3D®HYDRO建立了基于数值建模的设计图表和评级曲线。在1:4比例的阶梯池自然鱼道物理模型上的瞬时速度测量已被用于验证数值模型,该模型是根据现有的设计准则设计的。通过原型尺度上的数值模拟,分析了鱼道的水动力学特性与堰开比b r(0.10、0.25、0.45、0.65和1.00)和流量Q (0.1 ~ 1.5 m3/s)的关系。模拟结果表明,在b r = 0.10和0.25时,最大流速和平均流速明显低于b r > 0.25时。试验放电范围内的最大湍流动能和能量耗散因子均在推荐范围内(b r = 0.10和0.25)。目前的研究结果在设计图表和评级曲线方面说明了不同变量之间的关系,可以用于优化设计和易于现场实施。此外,本研究中提出的阶梯池NLF的床层结构可用于重建全尺寸或中试模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Physical Geography is a peer-reviewed, international journal, encompassing an interdisciplinary approach incorporating the latest developments and debates within Physical Geography and interrelated fields across the Earth, Biological and Ecological System Sciences.
期刊最新文献
A review of flash flood hazards influenced by various solid material sources in mountain environment An excess-work approach to assessing channel instability potential within urban streams of Chicago, Illinois: Relative importance of spatial variability in hydraulic conditions and stormwater mitigation Long-term ecological studies on the oxbow ecosystems development and fire history in the Drava river valley (Central Europe): Implications for ecological restoration Fluvial encounters: Experimenting with a ‘River’s voice’ amidst light-based datafication Identification, computation, and mapping of anthropogenic landforms in urban areas: Case studies in the historical centre of Genoa, Italy (UNESCO World Heritage)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1