Cost Saving of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Used in Non-Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Inpatients

Hening Pratiwi, Laksmi Maharani, Ika Mustikaningtias
{"title":"Cost Saving of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Used in Non-Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Inpatients","authors":"Hening Pratiwi, Laksmi Maharani, Ika Mustikaningtias","doi":"10.24123/mpi.v3i1.2323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is largely prescribed to ICU and non-ICU patients. SUP, an acid-suppressive drug, is overused in hospital settings mainly due to inadequate prescriptions in low-risk patients. In this context, the appropriate administration of SUP needs to be analyzed, and the potentially saved money from reducing excessive use can thereby be quantified. This study was intended to calculate potential cost savings in inappropriate SUP therapy in non-ICU inpatients. With a non-experimental retrospective design, it analyzed medical records and details obtained from the financial department of “X” hospital in Purwokerto, Indonesia. The data were collected from 80 non-ICU inpatients in May 2015, which were selected by purposive sampling. We calculated potential cost savings by referring to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines that had been modified by Zeitoun (2011) for stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-ICU inpatients. The results showed that inappropriate indications and doses were found in 32.5% and 18% of selected patients, respectively. Before the cost-saving calculation, patients had to spend USD 2,411. However, after the analysis eliminated unnecessary SUP use, this number was proven to be potentially decreased by USD 512 to only USD 1,899. Based on the Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test result (p = 0.000 (≤ 0.05)), there was a significant difference between the total cost before and after the application of modified ASHP guidelines for appropriateness. After a thorough assessment, we concluded that the treatment cost could be reduced by identifying and excluding inappropriateness in SUP therapy.","PeriodicalId":18807,"journal":{"name":"MPI (Media Pharmaceutica Indonesiana)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MPI (Media Pharmaceutica Indonesiana)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24123/mpi.v3i1.2323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is largely prescribed to ICU and non-ICU patients. SUP, an acid-suppressive drug, is overused in hospital settings mainly due to inadequate prescriptions in low-risk patients. In this context, the appropriate administration of SUP needs to be analyzed, and the potentially saved money from reducing excessive use can thereby be quantified. This study was intended to calculate potential cost savings in inappropriate SUP therapy in non-ICU inpatients. With a non-experimental retrospective design, it analyzed medical records and details obtained from the financial department of “X” hospital in Purwokerto, Indonesia. The data were collected from 80 non-ICU inpatients in May 2015, which were selected by purposive sampling. We calculated potential cost savings by referring to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines that had been modified by Zeitoun (2011) for stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-ICU inpatients. The results showed that inappropriate indications and doses were found in 32.5% and 18% of selected patients, respectively. Before the cost-saving calculation, patients had to spend USD 2,411. However, after the analysis eliminated unnecessary SUP use, this number was proven to be potentially decreased by USD 512 to only USD 1,899. Based on the Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test result (p = 0.000 (≤ 0.05)), there was a significant difference between the total cost before and after the application of modified ASHP guidelines for appropriateness. After a thorough assessment, we concluded that the treatment cost could be reduced by identifying and excluding inappropriateness in SUP therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非重症监护病房(ICU)住院患者应激性溃疡预防的成本节约
应激性溃疡预防(SUP)主要用于ICU和非ICU患者。SUP是一种抑酸药物,在医院环境中被过度使用,主要是由于低风险患者的处方不足。在这种情况下,需要对SUP的适当管理进行分析,从而可以量化减少过度使用所节省的潜在资金。本研究旨在计算非icu住院患者不适当SUP治疗的潜在成本节约。采用非实验回顾性设计,分析了从印度尼西亚普沃克托“X”医院财务部门获得的医疗记录和详细信息。数据采自2015年5月非icu住院患者80例,采用有目的抽样方法。我们参照Zeitoun(2011)修订的美国卫生系统药剂师协会(ASHP)非icu住院患者应激性溃疡预防指南,计算了潜在的成本节约。结果显示,32.5%和18%的入选患者存在不适当的适应症和剂量。在节省成本之前,患者需要花费2411美元。然而,在分析消除了不必要的SUP使用后,这个数字被证明可能会减少512美元,仅为1,899美元。根据Wilcoxon Sign Rank检验结果(p = 0.000(≤0.05)),应用改良的ASHP适宜性指南前后的总成本存在显著差异。经过全面的评估,我们得出结论,通过识别和排除SUP治疗的不适当性,可以降低治疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pengaruh Telefarmasi Terhadap Kepatuhan dan Target Pengobatan Pasien DMT2 RP-HPLC Method Validation for Purity Assay of α-Mangostin Isolate Efektivitas Tonikum Tepung Ikan Sepat Rawa (Trichopodus thricopterus) Dengan Metode Rotarod Test Pengaruh Obat Antituberkulosis Kombinasi RHZE Terhadap Peningkatan Kadar Asam Urat Hubungan Pelayanan Farmasi dengan Kepatuhan Pengobatan Pasien Penyakit Paru Obstruktif Kronik (PPOK)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1