{"title":"Waldo, blind inquirers, and an elephant: Locating learning in social movements","authors":"F. Erickson","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2021.1880190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This special issue introduces a new focus for inquiry in the learning sciences. When research attention turns to learning that takes place within social movements, the scope and scale of inquiry expands dramatically. It becomes difficult to see learning, as we usually conceive it. The author’s commentary begins with two metaphors for difficulty in this new arena of research. A first metaphor is that of “Waldo,” a cartoon figure visually represented as located somewhere within crowds of persons that are similarly dressed. This illustrates the problem of scale in the study of social movements, in attempts to monitor activity that is widely dispersed in space and time. A second metaphor is that of blind inquirers attempting to study an elephant—each inquirer only gets a partial apprehension of the whole. This points to the multiplicity of opportunities to learn within social movements—raising awareness in social critique, acquiring skills in organizing, developing fluency in rhetorics of persuasion. Because movement-situated learning is so multidimensional it is difficult for a single study to account for the full range of learning opportunities that a movement affords. In its middle section the commentary surveys specific examples of limits and affordances in research on learning in social movements, by reviewing briefly the empirical studies reported in the journal articles and by recounting the author’s personal experience in the Civil Rights movement in Chicago in the 1960’s. The commentary concludes on a cautionary note, observing that many of the processes of social movement formation, and of learning opportunities that develop within such movements, are similar in movements that are regressive as well as in those that are progressive in aim.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":"27 1 1","pages":"151 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1880190","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This special issue introduces a new focus for inquiry in the learning sciences. When research attention turns to learning that takes place within social movements, the scope and scale of inquiry expands dramatically. It becomes difficult to see learning, as we usually conceive it. The author’s commentary begins with two metaphors for difficulty in this new arena of research. A first metaphor is that of “Waldo,” a cartoon figure visually represented as located somewhere within crowds of persons that are similarly dressed. This illustrates the problem of scale in the study of social movements, in attempts to monitor activity that is widely dispersed in space and time. A second metaphor is that of blind inquirers attempting to study an elephant—each inquirer only gets a partial apprehension of the whole. This points to the multiplicity of opportunities to learn within social movements—raising awareness in social critique, acquiring skills in organizing, developing fluency in rhetorics of persuasion. Because movement-situated learning is so multidimensional it is difficult for a single study to account for the full range of learning opportunities that a movement affords. In its middle section the commentary surveys specific examples of limits and affordances in research on learning in social movements, by reviewing briefly the empirical studies reported in the journal articles and by recounting the author’s personal experience in the Civil Rights movement in Chicago in the 1960’s. The commentary concludes on a cautionary note, observing that many of the processes of social movement formation, and of learning opportunities that develop within such movements, are similar in movements that are regressive as well as in those that are progressive in aim.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the Learning Sciences (JLS) is one of the two official journals of the International Society of the Learning Sciences ( www.isls.org). JLS provides a multidisciplinary forum for research on education and learning that informs theories of how people learn and the design of learning environments. It publishes research that elucidates processes of learning, and the ways in which technologies, instructional practices, and learning environments can be designed to support learning in different contexts. JLS articles draw on theoretical frameworks from such diverse fields as cognitive science, sociocultural theory, educational psychology, computer science, and anthropology. Submissions are not limited to any particular research method, but must be based on rigorous analyses that present new insights into how people learn and/or how learning can be supported and enhanced. Successful submissions should position their argument within extant literature in the learning sciences. They should reflect the core practices and foci that have defined the learning sciences as a field: privileging design in methodology and pedagogy; emphasizing interdisciplinarity and methodological innovation; grounding research in real-world contexts; answering questions about learning process and mechanism, alongside outcomes; pursuing technological and pedagogical innovation; and maintaining a strong connection between research and practice.