Why do Firms Operate Informally? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review

Q3 Social Sciences Innovar Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99451
Florencia Verónica Pedroni, Gabriela Pesce, A. Briozzo
{"title":"Why do Firms Operate Informally? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Florencia Verónica Pedroni, Gabriela Pesce, A. Briozzo","doi":"10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates factors that motivate entrepreneurs to completely operate within informality and the drivers of formal companies to underreport revenues. In particular, this work identifies and organizes the determinants of firm informality through a systematic literature review in Scopus and Web of Science databases. The article presents several contributions. First, it examines the two main frameworks of informality (structuralist/exclusion and legalistic/exit dimensions) and links this with the different roles of unregistered firms in economic development (survival, De Soto, and parasite views). It also studies the theoretical basis of informality, including economic, institutional, psychological, and sociological aspects. Second, the paper summarizes business informality determinants based on studies with different methodological approaches (macro, microeconomic), contexts (developed, emerging, transition economies), and periods (1983-2018). Our results show that firm informality is mostly addressed in the examined literature as a decision or voluntary choice by companies and entrepreneurs (legalistic vision). Third, the article proposes an integral theoretical model, according to which the firm informality level is determined by structural elements (company and entrepreneur’s characteristics) and environmental factors (corruption, bureaucracy, taxes, etc.). The analysis is relevant for researchers studying this subject and for policymakers as well.","PeriodicalId":40012,"journal":{"name":"Innovar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper investigates factors that motivate entrepreneurs to completely operate within informality and the drivers of formal companies to underreport revenues. In particular, this work identifies and organizes the determinants of firm informality through a systematic literature review in Scopus and Web of Science databases. The article presents several contributions. First, it examines the two main frameworks of informality (structuralist/exclusion and legalistic/exit dimensions) and links this with the different roles of unregistered firms in economic development (survival, De Soto, and parasite views). It also studies the theoretical basis of informality, including economic, institutional, psychological, and sociological aspects. Second, the paper summarizes business informality determinants based on studies with different methodological approaches (macro, microeconomic), contexts (developed, emerging, transition economies), and periods (1983-2018). Our results show that firm informality is mostly addressed in the examined literature as a decision or voluntary choice by companies and entrepreneurs (legalistic vision). Third, the article proposes an integral theoretical model, according to which the firm informality level is determined by structural elements (company and entrepreneur’s characteristics) and environmental factors (corruption, bureaucracy, taxes, etc.). The analysis is relevant for researchers studying this subject and for policymakers as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么企业会以非正式的方式运作?来自系统文献综述的见解
本文研究了激励企业家完全在非正式环境中运作的因素以及正式公司少报收入的驱动因素。特别是,这项工作通过在Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行系统的文献综述,确定并组织了企业非正式性的决定因素。本文提出了几个贡献。首先,它考察了非正式性的两个主要框架(结构主义/排斥和法律主义/退出维度),并将其与未注册公司在经济发展中的不同角色(生存、德索托和寄生虫观点)联系起来。它还研究了非正式性的理论基础,包括经济、制度、心理和社会学方面。其次,本文基于不同方法论(宏观、微观经济)、背景(发达经济体、新兴经济体、转型经济体)和时期(1983-2018年)的研究,总结了商业非正式性的决定因素。我们的研究结果表明,在研究的文献中,公司非正式性主要被认为是公司和企业家的决定或自愿选择(法律主义视角)。第三,本文提出了一个整体的理论模型,根据该模型,企业非正式程度由结构因素(公司和企业家的特征)和环境因素(腐败、官僚主义、税收等)决定。这一分析对研究这一主题的研究人员和政策制定者都有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Innovar
Innovar Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: INNOVAR is a journal that publishes top research in organizations from social sciences and other fields. Its target is composed by professionals and scholars. INNOVAR is indexed in recognized international databases as Scopus. In light of its quality and visibility, in Colombia INNOVAR have the highest category in the National Bibliographic Index of Colombian scientific and technological publications (A1). INNOVAR publishes original works, result of rigorous research, from different approaches in social and management sciences, without biases to certain methodological perspectives.
期刊最新文献
How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa Caracterización e impacto de los hallazgos contenidos en informes de auditoría aprobados por la Contraloría General del Estado del Ecuador entre los períodos 2016-2019 Intercooperação, (eco)inovação e desempenho: um estudo de caso na Rede de Comercialização Solidária do Tapajós, estado do Pará, Brasil El emprendimiento social: un acercamiento a su medición dentro del contexto mexicano Política tecnológica e innovación. El rol de la dirección de recursos humanos desde una perspectiva dual de proceso y contenido
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1