Application of Accurate Quantification Methods for Determining Emissions from the Acid Gas Removal Process in Natural Gas Processing

Qing Bian, D. Paradine, K. Wreford, Jennifer Eby, Y. Jamin, P. Sriram
{"title":"Application of Accurate Quantification Methods for Determining Emissions from the Acid Gas Removal Process in Natural Gas Processing","authors":"Qing Bian, D. Paradine, K. Wreford, Jennifer Eby, Y. Jamin, P. Sriram","doi":"10.7569/jnge.2017.692505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents new methods for accurately determining quantities of acid gas (CO2 and H2S) removed from acid gas removal (AGR) units in natural gas processing plants, and their applications to actual production data, with an emphasis on CO2 quantity determination. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from anthropogenic activities contribute to climate change. The natural gas sector releases significant quantities of GHGs. AGR is a key step in natural gas processing, whereby H2S and CO2 are stripped from raw natural gas. Determining accurate CO2 emission quantities arising from AGR units has been challenging in the context of GHG emission quantification. The US Environmental Protection Agency and the Western Climate Initiative have each developed GHG quantification methods for petroleum and natural gas systems which include the AGR process. However, there is uncertainty about the accuracy of these approaches since not all aspects of the AGR process are taken into consideration. The proposed new methods for AGR GHG quantification are assessed using production data over three years from three natural gas plants. Assuming all other process factors are held constant, quantities of removed acid gas are functions of: •CO2 and H2S content in the inlet and outlet gas streams; and •the gas volume of either the inlet or outlet stream, depending on which quantification method is used. It is revealed that two main factors contribute to inaccurate GHG quantification from AGR units in practice so far: •the use of inlet gas stream volume instead of outlet gas stream volume; and, •failure to account for H2S content in the gas. In this study, inaccurately measured inlet gas stream volume was the primary cause of AGR CO2 quantification error and uncertainty. All calculation methods using inlet gas stream volume overestimated the CO2 quantity removed from an AGR unit by 3–11%. Quantification accuracy using volumes measured by inlet gas meters is limited because there is commonly a loss of gas volume from the inlet stream before it enters an AGR unit, and acid gas corrodes the metals in gas stream meters, which reduces meter accuracy. The H2S content of raw natural gas also has a significant impact on the accuracy of AGR CO2 removal quantification. Results show that methods using outlet gas stream volume without considering H2S content underestimate removed CO2 quantity by a factor of 1.1 times the H2S content in inlet gas stream. The error induced by this method linearly correlates to H2S content in the inlet gas stream. The higher the H2S content in the inlet stream, the larger the error. Calculation using outlet gas stream volume and H2S content in both inlet and outlet gas streams is recommended as a default method for quantifying GHG emissions from AGR units. Meanwhile, quantification methods for removed hydrogen sulfide (H2S) are also presented from the AGR process.","PeriodicalId":22694,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Natural Gas Engineering","volume":"126 1","pages":"111 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Natural Gas Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7569/jnge.2017.692505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article presents new methods for accurately determining quantities of acid gas (CO2 and H2S) removed from acid gas removal (AGR) units in natural gas processing plants, and their applications to actual production data, with an emphasis on CO2 quantity determination. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from anthropogenic activities contribute to climate change. The natural gas sector releases significant quantities of GHGs. AGR is a key step in natural gas processing, whereby H2S and CO2 are stripped from raw natural gas. Determining accurate CO2 emission quantities arising from AGR units has been challenging in the context of GHG emission quantification. The US Environmental Protection Agency and the Western Climate Initiative have each developed GHG quantification methods for petroleum and natural gas systems which include the AGR process. However, there is uncertainty about the accuracy of these approaches since not all aspects of the AGR process are taken into consideration. The proposed new methods for AGR GHG quantification are assessed using production data over three years from three natural gas plants. Assuming all other process factors are held constant, quantities of removed acid gas are functions of: •CO2 and H2S content in the inlet and outlet gas streams; and •the gas volume of either the inlet or outlet stream, depending on which quantification method is used. It is revealed that two main factors contribute to inaccurate GHG quantification from AGR units in practice so far: •the use of inlet gas stream volume instead of outlet gas stream volume; and, •failure to account for H2S content in the gas. In this study, inaccurately measured inlet gas stream volume was the primary cause of AGR CO2 quantification error and uncertainty. All calculation methods using inlet gas stream volume overestimated the CO2 quantity removed from an AGR unit by 3–11%. Quantification accuracy using volumes measured by inlet gas meters is limited because there is commonly a loss of gas volume from the inlet stream before it enters an AGR unit, and acid gas corrodes the metals in gas stream meters, which reduces meter accuracy. The H2S content of raw natural gas also has a significant impact on the accuracy of AGR CO2 removal quantification. Results show that methods using outlet gas stream volume without considering H2S content underestimate removed CO2 quantity by a factor of 1.1 times the H2S content in inlet gas stream. The error induced by this method linearly correlates to H2S content in the inlet gas stream. The higher the H2S content in the inlet stream, the larger the error. Calculation using outlet gas stream volume and H2S content in both inlet and outlet gas streams is recommended as a default method for quantifying GHG emissions from AGR units. Meanwhile, quantification methods for removed hydrogen sulfide (H2S) are also presented from the AGR process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精确定量方法在测定天然气加工中酸性气体脱除过程排放中的应用
摘要本文介绍了准确测定天然气加工厂酸性气体脱除装置(AGR)中酸性气体(CO2和H2S)脱除量的新方法及其在实际生产数据中的应用,重点介绍了二氧化碳(CO2)量的测定。人为活动产生的温室气体(GHG)排放加剧了气候变化。天然气行业排放了大量的温室气体。AGR是天然气加工的关键步骤,即从原料天然气中剥离H2S和CO2。在温室气体排放量化的背景下,准确确定AGR装置产生的二氧化碳排放量一直是一项挑战。美国环境保护署和西部气候倡议各自开发了包括AGR过程在内的石油和天然气系统的温室气体量化方法。然而,由于没有考虑到AGR过程的所有方面,这些方法的准确性存在不确定性。利用三家天然气厂三年的生产数据,对提出的AGR温室气体量化新方法进行了评估。假设所有其他工艺因素保持不变,去除酸性气体的数量是:•进出口气流中CO2和H2S含量的函数;以及•进口或出口流的气体体积,取决于使用哪种量化方法。结果表明,迄今为止,两个主要因素导致AGR装置的温室气体定量不准确:•使用进口气流体积而不是出口气流体积;•未能考虑到气体中H2S的含量。在本研究中,进口气流体积测量不准确是导致AGR CO2定量误差和不确定性的主要原因。所有使用进口气流体积的计算方法都高估了AGR装置去除的二氧化碳量3-11%。由于进口气流在进入AGR装置之前通常会有气体体积的损失,并且酸性气体会腐蚀气流仪表中的金属,从而降低了仪表的精度,因此使用进口气体仪表测量体积的量化精度受到限制。原料天然气中H2S含量对AGR CO2去除率定量的准确性也有显著影响。结果表明,使用出口气流体积而不考虑H2S含量的方法低估了进口气流中H2S含量的1.1倍的CO2去除量。该方法引起的误差与进口气流中H2S含量呈线性相关。进口流中H2S含量越高,误差越大。建议使用出口气流体积和进出口气流中H2S含量作为量化AGR装置温室气体排放的默认方法。同时,提出了AGR过程中硫化氢(H2S)脱除的定量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chapter 6 Production Sulfur Solubilities in Toluene, o-Xylene, m-Xylene and p-Xylene at Temperatures Ranging from 303.15 K to 363.15 K Mathematical Modeling of Fluid Flow to Radially Fractured Wells in Unconventional Reservoirs Vapour-Liquid Equilibria of Ethane and Ethanethiol: Experiments and Modelling Solubility of Benzene in Aqueous Solutions of Monoethanolamine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1