Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Milik Terkait Penguasaan Tanah Bangunan Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Semarang

Dina Jessica, Ana Silviana
{"title":"Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Milik Terkait Penguasaan Tanah Bangunan Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Semarang","authors":"Dina Jessica, Ana Silviana","doi":"10.26532/jh.v39i1.30492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The object of this article is decision No. 414/Pdt/2020/PT SMG which decides the dispute over land ownership rights caused by still being controlled and owned by other parties. This study aims to determine the judge's considerations in deciding and stating the decision on disputes over rights to building land objects that have been purchased but cannot be controlled and owned, as well as legal consequences after the decision on disputes over rights to building land objects that have been purchased but cannot be controlled and owned. determined by the judge. This research method uses a normative juridical approach because it examines legal aspects and legal rules with library materials, namely books, accredited journals, laws and regulations, Civil Codes, and Theses. The research specification uses descriptive analysis law, with a case approach. The results showed that there was a problem in the process of buying and selling land by the Defendant/Appellant and the Comparator, even though the buying and selling process was by the Deed of Sale and Purchase number 607/Kaliwungu/2006. The control of land by the Defendant/Appellate in the case of the dispute over land ownership rights, decision number 414/Pdt/2020/PT SMG is invalid and null and void. Besides that, the legal consequence is that the Defendant/Appellate vacate and submit the object of a dispute to the Plaintiff and if necessary with State Security Equipment.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v39i1.30492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The object of this article is decision No. 414/Pdt/2020/PT SMG which decides the dispute over land ownership rights caused by still being controlled and owned by other parties. This study aims to determine the judge's considerations in deciding and stating the decision on disputes over rights to building land objects that have been purchased but cannot be controlled and owned, as well as legal consequences after the decision on disputes over rights to building land objects that have been purchased but cannot be controlled and owned. determined by the judge. This research method uses a normative juridical approach because it examines legal aspects and legal rules with library materials, namely books, accredited journals, laws and regulations, Civil Codes, and Theses. The research specification uses descriptive analysis law, with a case approach. The results showed that there was a problem in the process of buying and selling land by the Defendant/Appellant and the Comparator, even though the buying and selling process was by the Deed of Sale and Purchase number 607/Kaliwungu/2006. The control of land by the Defendant/Appellate in the case of the dispute over land ownership rights, decision number 414/Pdt/2020/PT SMG is invalid and null and void. Besides that, the legal consequence is that the Defendant/Appellate vacate and submit the object of a dispute to the Plaintiff and if necessary with State Security Equipment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决土地所有权纠纷,法院判例
本文的对象是关于因土地所有权仍被他人控制和拥有而引起的土地所有权纠纷的第414/Pdt/2020/PT SMG号决定。本研究旨在确定法官在对已购但无法控制和拥有的建筑用地使用权争议作出判决和陈述时的考虑因素,以及对已购但无法控制和拥有的建筑用地使用权争议作出判决后的法律后果。由法官决定。这种研究方法使用规范的司法方法,因为它通过图书馆资料(即书籍、认可的期刊、法律法规、民法典和论文)来检查法律方面和法律规则。研究规范采用描述性分析法,结合案例分析方法。结果显示,被告/上诉人和比较国在买卖土地的过程中存在问题,尽管买卖过程是根据编号为607/Kaliwungu/2006的买卖契约进行的。在土地所有权纠纷案中,第414/Pdt/2020/PT SMG号判决书中被告/上诉人对土地的控制无效。除此之外,法律后果是被告/上诉人撤回争议标的,并在必要时向原告提交国家安全设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
TINJAUAN FIQH SIASAH DAN YURIDIS TERHADAP WACANA SISTEM PROPORSIONAL TERTUTUP PADA PEMILU 2024 Implementasi Penerbitan Izin Penyelenggaraan Angkutan Sewa Khusus Oleh Dinas Perhubungan Provinsi Jawa Tengah Implementation Of Regional Regulation No. 3 Of 2022 Regarding Child Friendly District In Langkat District Viewed From The Perspective Of Fiqh Siyasah Pendaftaran Tanah Untuk Pertama Kali Secara Elektronik Dalam Hukum Pertanahan Nasional Legal Dynamics Of Land Digitalization In The Electronic Land Registration System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1