The 'scholastic' theology of Giovanni Pico della Mirandola: between biblical faith and academic skepticism

IF 0.3 2区 哲学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales Pub Date : 2007-12-31 DOI:10.2143/RTPM.74.2.2024659
A. Edelheit
{"title":"The 'scholastic' theology of Giovanni Pico della Mirandola: between biblical faith and academic skepticism","authors":"A. Edelheit","doi":"10.2143/RTPM.74.2.2024659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Giovanni Pico della Mirandola's detailed reaction against the condemnation of some of his famous Theses by a papal commission, through a careful reading of his Apology of 1487. This text, which was never studied in detail and still waits for a critical edition, reflects Pico's remarkable familiarity with the scholastic thinkers up to his own times. As part of his self-defense, Pico deals with the relation between opinions and faith, probable knowledge and certain truth, philosophy and theology, thus developing a method for examining theological opinions. To some extent, this method was based on the classical notions of probabile and veri simile, coming from the ancient Academic skeptics, which Pico knew from Cicero and Augustine. This, I argue, was part of Pico's humanist theology, his solution for the authority crisis of his time and for what he regarded as an unsolved tension in scholastic philosophy between human opinions and the revealed truth of faith.","PeriodicalId":41176,"journal":{"name":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","volume":"17 1","pages":"523-570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.74.2.2024659","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines Giovanni Pico della Mirandola's detailed reaction against the condemnation of some of his famous Theses by a papal commission, through a careful reading of his Apology of 1487. This text, which was never studied in detail and still waits for a critical edition, reflects Pico's remarkable familiarity with the scholastic thinkers up to his own times. As part of his self-defense, Pico deals with the relation between opinions and faith, probable knowledge and certain truth, philosophy and theology, thus developing a method for examining theological opinions. To some extent, this method was based on the classical notions of probabile and veri simile, coming from the ancient Academic skeptics, which Pico knew from Cicero and Augustine. This, I argue, was part of Pico's humanist theology, his solution for the authority crisis of his time and for what he regarded as an unsolved tension in scholastic philosophy between human opinions and the revealed truth of faith.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乔瓦尼·皮科·德拉·米兰多拉的“经院”神学:在圣经信仰和学术怀疑主义之间
本文通过仔细阅读Giovanni Pico della Mirandola于1487年发表的《致歉书》(Apology),详细探讨了他对教皇委员会谴责他的一些著名论文的反应。这篇文章,从未被详细研究过,仍在等待一个批评版本,反映了皮科对他自己时代的学术思想家的非凡熟悉。作为他自我辩护的一部分,皮科处理了观点和信仰、可能的知识和确定的真理、哲学和神学之间的关系,从而发展了一种检验神学观点的方法。在某种程度上,这种方法是基于古典的概率和真实的概念,来自古代学术怀疑论者,皮科从西塞罗和奥古斯丁那里了解到。我认为,这是皮科人文主义神学的一部分,他解决了他那个时代的权威危机,解决了他认为在经院哲学中,人类观点与信仰的启示真理之间尚未解决的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales / Forschungen zur Theologie und Philosophie des Mittelalters (formerly Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale of the Abbaye Mont César) provides a forum for original, high-quality research on all aspects of theology and philosophy from Augustine and the Early Middle Ages up to late scholasticism. Recent articles have included highly focused studies on particular facets of the medieval philosophical or theological tradition, broader reconsiderations of received views in the history of medieval theology and philosophy, and editions of texts and manuscript studies.
期刊最新文献
Adam of Bocfeld or Roger Bacon? New remarks on a commentary on the Book of Causes Koinzidenz der Gegensätze und Voluntarisierung Gottes Trinitarian Theology, Authority, and Fideism [Book review] Zur Meister Eckhart-Rezeption im Spätmittelalter LE PROLOGUE DE LA LECTVRA IN ETHICAM VETEREM DU «COMMENTAIRE DE PARIS» (1235-1240) INTRODUCTION ET TEXTE CRITIQUE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1