Pet Death and Owners’ Memorialization Choices

Q2 Social Sciences Illness Crisis and Loss Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1177/10541373221143046
L. Kogan, W. Packman, Cori Bussolari, Jennifer Currin-McCulloch, Phyllis Erdman
{"title":"Pet Death and Owners’ Memorialization Choices","authors":"L. Kogan, W. Packman, Cori Bussolari, Jennifer Currin-McCulloch, Phyllis Erdman","doi":"10.1177/10541373221143046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increasing number of people view their pets as family members and the death of a pet often induces a grief reaction of comparable severity to the loss of a significant human relationship. Yet, despite similar levels of grief, the death of a pet typically does not involve similar rituals that allow owners to express their grief. This study was designed to better understand how people memorialize their pets through the use of continuing bonds (CB) expressions, as well as their choices pertaining to after-death body care, decisions related to taking time off work following the death, the impact of their religious beliefs on memorialization choices, and how their veterinarian responded to the death. An online, anonymous, cross-sectional survey was distributed to pet owners who had experienced the loss of a companion animal, resulting in 517 responses, most of whom were White (86%), female (91%) and resided in the United States (87%). We found that choices regarding the expression of CB in response to pet death are similar to those witnessed after human loss. This study is one of the first to identify the wide array of pet owners’ choices regarding memorialization and emphasizes the importance of recognizing individual choices. These results suggest that it is essential that those grieving the death of their pet be supported and reassured that there is no right or wrong way to grieve, with all options recognized as legitimate in the experience and expression of one's grief.","PeriodicalId":39747,"journal":{"name":"Illness Crisis and Loss","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Illness Crisis and Loss","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10541373221143046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An increasing number of people view their pets as family members and the death of a pet often induces a grief reaction of comparable severity to the loss of a significant human relationship. Yet, despite similar levels of grief, the death of a pet typically does not involve similar rituals that allow owners to express their grief. This study was designed to better understand how people memorialize their pets through the use of continuing bonds (CB) expressions, as well as their choices pertaining to after-death body care, decisions related to taking time off work following the death, the impact of their religious beliefs on memorialization choices, and how their veterinarian responded to the death. An online, anonymous, cross-sectional survey was distributed to pet owners who had experienced the loss of a companion animal, resulting in 517 responses, most of whom were White (86%), female (91%) and resided in the United States (87%). We found that choices regarding the expression of CB in response to pet death are similar to those witnessed after human loss. This study is one of the first to identify the wide array of pet owners’ choices regarding memorialization and emphasizes the importance of recognizing individual choices. These results suggest that it is essential that those grieving the death of their pet be supported and reassured that there is no right or wrong way to grieve, with all options recognized as legitimate in the experience and expression of one's grief.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宠物死亡和主人的纪念选择
越来越多的人把他们的宠物视为家庭成员,宠物的死亡往往会引起一种悲伤的反应,其严重程度与失去一段重要的人际关系相当。然而,尽管悲伤程度相似,宠物的死亡通常不会涉及类似的仪式,让主人表达他们的悲伤。这项研究旨在更好地了解人们如何通过使用持续联系(CB)表达来纪念他们的宠物,以及他们对死后遗体护理的选择,与死亡后休假有关的决定,他们的宗教信仰对纪念选择的影响,以及他们的兽医对死亡的反应。一项在线匿名横断面调查向失去伴侣动物的宠物主人分发,得到517份回复,其中大多数是白人(86%),女性(91%)和居住在美国的人(87%)。我们发现,在宠物死亡后,关于CB表达的选择与人类死亡后的选择相似。这项研究首次确定了宠物主人在纪念活动方面的各种选择,并强调了认识到个人选择的重要性。这些结果表明,对于那些为宠物的死亡而悲伤的人来说,重要的是要得到支持,并让他们放心,没有正确或错误的悲伤方式,所有的选择都是在经历和表达悲伤时被认为是合法的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Illness Crisis and Loss
Illness Crisis and Loss Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: When dealing with issues of grief, crisis, or loss as a counselor, medical professional, or researcher, it can be difficult to find resources to help you in your work. Receiving the most current research on the latest topics in the field from Illness, Crisis & Loss can help. Illness, Crisis & Loss is the resource that furthers your understanding and knowledge of the psychosocial and ethical issues associated with life-threatening illness, traumatic human crises, grief, and loss.
期刊最新文献
Theorizing Post-Incarceration Transition Crisis and Readiness Through Veteran Identity Work Seeking Comfort and Demanding Agency—An Autoethnographic Exploration of a Patient and Partner Experience Network Analysis of Posttraumatic Growth Dimensions: A Cross-Sectional Study in People Who Experienced the Death of a Loved One from COVID-19 in 16 Latin American Countries The Qualitative DIGNISPACE Study: The Co-Design of a Life Review, Meaning-Making and Legacy Leaving Digital Intervention for Young People with Life-Limiting Conditions The Loss of a Spouse Following an Oncological Disease: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1