Psicologia e Políticas Públicas no Brasil: Convergências nas Práxis do Campo Profi ssional

F. F. Oliveira, Susanne G. Coelho, J. A. Santos, Franciely L. Duarte, M. E. L. Faria
{"title":"Psicologia e Políticas Públicas no Brasil: Convergências nas Práxis do Campo Profi ssional","authors":"F. F. Oliveira, Susanne G. Coelho, J. A. Santos, Franciely L. Duarte, M. E. L. Faria","doi":"10.9788/cp2023.1-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project aimed to understand how Psychology, in the fi eld of public policies, can present characteristics and similarities that lead to understanding the sense of unity in professional practice, in different areas of activity. It was a documentary, bibliographical and qualitative research, which used Bardin’s Content Analysis techniques for the critical interpretation of offi cial documents (CREPOP’s Technical References and Resolutions for professional practice) and theoretical bases. For the analyses, the MAXQDA was used considering variables/markers and their meanings, together with the reading of documents on attributions and professional practices of Psychology. The References analyzed dealt with the work in Psychology in the following spaces: Brazilian Health System Hospital Services; Human Mobility and Transit; Primary Health Care; Psychosocial Units and, Emergencies and Disasters. Once the analysis corpus was built, the most frequent results in the categorization of main terms were: Treatment (70), Reception (53) and Prevention/Promotion (45). Once the concepts were constructed for each category, treatment and promotion/prevention stood out – such as strategies and interventions aimed at minimizing mental health problems –, as well as autonomy and improving the quality of life of the person assisted. Recognizing the limits of the methodological framework, it was observed that a single defi nition for the work in Psychology was not feasible, while demonstrating possibilities of understanding transversal and common practices to envision a sense of unity, with social commitment, and that respects the particularities and breadth of this science and profession.Keywords: Psychology, professional practice, public policies, social commitment","PeriodicalId":33882,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9788/cp2023.1-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This project aimed to understand how Psychology, in the fi eld of public policies, can present characteristics and similarities that lead to understanding the sense of unity in professional practice, in different areas of activity. It was a documentary, bibliographical and qualitative research, which used Bardin’s Content Analysis techniques for the critical interpretation of offi cial documents (CREPOP’s Technical References and Resolutions for professional practice) and theoretical bases. For the analyses, the MAXQDA was used considering variables/markers and their meanings, together with the reading of documents on attributions and professional practices of Psychology. The References analyzed dealt with the work in Psychology in the following spaces: Brazilian Health System Hospital Services; Human Mobility and Transit; Primary Health Care; Psychosocial Units and, Emergencies and Disasters. Once the analysis corpus was built, the most frequent results in the categorization of main terms were: Treatment (70), Reception (53) and Prevention/Promotion (45). Once the concepts were constructed for each category, treatment and promotion/prevention stood out – such as strategies and interventions aimed at minimizing mental health problems –, as well as autonomy and improving the quality of life of the person assisted. Recognizing the limits of the methodological framework, it was observed that a single defi nition for the work in Psychology was not feasible, while demonstrating possibilities of understanding transversal and common practices to envision a sense of unity, with social commitment, and that respects the particularities and breadth of this science and profession.Keywords: Psychology, professional practice, public policies, social commitment
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西心理学与公共政策:专业领域实践的趋同
该项目旨在了解心理学在公共政策领域如何呈现出特征和相似性,从而在不同的活动领域中理解专业实践中的统一性。这是一项文献性、目录性和质性的研究,运用巴尔丁的内容分析技术对官方文件进行批判性解读(CREPOP的专业实践技术参考和决议)和理论基础。为了进行分析,我们使用了MAXQDA,考虑变量/标记及其含义,同时阅读了有关归因和心理学专业实践的文件。所分析的参考文献涉及以下领域的心理学工作:巴西卫生系统医院服务;人员流动和过境;初级卫生保健;社会心理单位,紧急情况和灾害。一旦建立了分析语料库,在主要术语分类中最常见的结果是:治疗(70),接收(53)和预防/促进(45)。一旦为每个类别构建了概念,治疗和促进/预防就显得突出——例如旨在尽量减少心理健康问题的战略和干预措施——以及自主性和改善受助人的生活质量。认识到方法论框架的局限性,人们观察到,心理学工作的单一定义是不可行的,同时展示了理解横向和共同实践的可能性,以设想一种团结感,具有社会承诺,并尊重这门科学和专业的特殊性和广度。关键词:心理学,专业实践,公共政策,社会承诺
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
78 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intensificação laboral e gênero profissional de professoras da educação infantil Relações de gênero e trabalho das mulheres na Cadernos de Psicologia Social e do Trabalho: uma revisão bibliográfica (1998-2018) Percepções de mulheres sobre gestação e os sentidos do trabalho Impactos Psicológicos da Pandemia de Coronavírus (COVID-19) em Profi ssionais de Saúde: Overview Percepção de Estresse em Tempos de Pandemia COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1