Farm Mechanization in Indian Agriculture with Focus on Tractors

IF 1 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural and Food Science Pub Date : 2020-09-08 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3689250
A. Gulati, R. Juneja
{"title":"Farm Mechanization in Indian Agriculture with Focus on Tractors","authors":"A. Gulati, R. Juneja","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3689250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indian agriculture is dominated by smallholders. With an average holding size of just 1.08 hectares (ha) (in 2015-16), and 86 percent of holdings being of less than 2 ha in size, Indian agriculture transformed the country from functioning ‘ship-to-mouth’ during the mid-1960s to being a net exporter of agri-produce today. This would not have been possible without the onset of the Green Revolution post-1965, which resulted in increased foodgrain production and productivity. Among various inputs such as seeds, irrigation and fertilizers, the productivity of farms also depends greatly on the availability and judicious use of farm power by the farmers. Between the mid-20th century and 2013-14, India witnessed a tremendous shift away from traditional agriculture processes to mechanized processes. Today, 88 percent of the total farm power comes from tractors, diesel engine pump-sets, electric pump-sets and power tillers (2013-14). Additionally, India has emerged as the largest manufacturer of tractors in the world, followed by the USA and China. But how has farm mechanization, especially the use of tractors, evolved in India over time? What were the key drivers of the demand for tractors? And how efficiently are the tractors being used in terms of usage by number of hours/year? Given the high cost of tractors, it is also interesting to see how far they have penetrated the small and marginal holdings, i.e., the issues of inclusiveness, financial viability and sustainability. These are some of the key questions that are addressed in this study. Our analysis shows that farm mechanization in India, especially the use of tractors, has made commendable progress. With major policy changes, entry of private farm machinery manufacturing companies and foreign collaborations, farm power availability increased from 0.25 kilowatt per hectare (kW/ha) in 1951 to 2.02 kW/ha in 2017. Furthermore, the contribution of mechanized sources to farm power increased from some 3 percent in 1951 to 88 percent in 2013-14, replacing human and draught power. In addition, the production of tractors increased significantly from a meager 880 units in 1951 to about 900,000 units in 2019. This has transformed India from being a net importer of tractors through the 1960s and 1970s to being an exporter of tractors, exporting some 92,000 units in 2019. In terms of inclusiveness, although larger farms are more mechanized, the Input Census data (2011-12) reveals that even in the category of small and marginal holdings (less than 2 ha), an average of roughly 44 percent of farmers use farm machinery (e.g., tractors, diesel engine pump sets, electric pump sets and power tillers). This is a good achievement, but further improvements are always possible and major attempts in this direction are already underway with heavy policy support through Custom Hiring Centres (CHCs). However, the fact that farm machinery is expensive also raises concerns over whether it is financially viable and sustainable to own and use on smallholder farms. It is therefore important to look at unfolding innovations providing farm machinery services through ‘CHCs’ and ‘Uberization’ models. These innovations make farm machinery and equipments perfectly divisible as a service to all classes of farmers at the doorstep at affordable cost on a ‘pay per use’ basis. This seems to be the future of farm machinery usage in India, if it is developed as a sustainable business model with due support of policy and finance.","PeriodicalId":7393,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Food Science","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3689250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Indian agriculture is dominated by smallholders. With an average holding size of just 1.08 hectares (ha) (in 2015-16), and 86 percent of holdings being of less than 2 ha in size, Indian agriculture transformed the country from functioning ‘ship-to-mouth’ during the mid-1960s to being a net exporter of agri-produce today. This would not have been possible without the onset of the Green Revolution post-1965, which resulted in increased foodgrain production and productivity. Among various inputs such as seeds, irrigation and fertilizers, the productivity of farms also depends greatly on the availability and judicious use of farm power by the farmers. Between the mid-20th century and 2013-14, India witnessed a tremendous shift away from traditional agriculture processes to mechanized processes. Today, 88 percent of the total farm power comes from tractors, diesel engine pump-sets, electric pump-sets and power tillers (2013-14). Additionally, India has emerged as the largest manufacturer of tractors in the world, followed by the USA and China. But how has farm mechanization, especially the use of tractors, evolved in India over time? What were the key drivers of the demand for tractors? And how efficiently are the tractors being used in terms of usage by number of hours/year? Given the high cost of tractors, it is also interesting to see how far they have penetrated the small and marginal holdings, i.e., the issues of inclusiveness, financial viability and sustainability. These are some of the key questions that are addressed in this study. Our analysis shows that farm mechanization in India, especially the use of tractors, has made commendable progress. With major policy changes, entry of private farm machinery manufacturing companies and foreign collaborations, farm power availability increased from 0.25 kilowatt per hectare (kW/ha) in 1951 to 2.02 kW/ha in 2017. Furthermore, the contribution of mechanized sources to farm power increased from some 3 percent in 1951 to 88 percent in 2013-14, replacing human and draught power. In addition, the production of tractors increased significantly from a meager 880 units in 1951 to about 900,000 units in 2019. This has transformed India from being a net importer of tractors through the 1960s and 1970s to being an exporter of tractors, exporting some 92,000 units in 2019. In terms of inclusiveness, although larger farms are more mechanized, the Input Census data (2011-12) reveals that even in the category of small and marginal holdings (less than 2 ha), an average of roughly 44 percent of farmers use farm machinery (e.g., tractors, diesel engine pump sets, electric pump sets and power tillers). This is a good achievement, but further improvements are always possible and major attempts in this direction are already underway with heavy policy support through Custom Hiring Centres (CHCs). However, the fact that farm machinery is expensive also raises concerns over whether it is financially viable and sustainable to own and use on smallholder farms. It is therefore important to look at unfolding innovations providing farm machinery services through ‘CHCs’ and ‘Uberization’ models. These innovations make farm machinery and equipments perfectly divisible as a service to all classes of farmers at the doorstep at affordable cost on a ‘pay per use’ basis. This seems to be the future of farm machinery usage in India, if it is developed as a sustainable business model with due support of policy and finance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以拖拉机为重点的印度农业机械化
印度农业以小农为主。2015-16年,印度的平均农场面积仅为1.08公顷,86%的农场面积不到2公顷,印度农业将该国从20世纪60年代中期的“船到口”转变为今天的农产品净出口国。如果没有1965年后绿色革命的爆发,粮食产量和生产力的提高,这是不可能实现的。在诸如种子、灌溉和肥料等各种投入中,农场的生产力也在很大程度上取决于农民对农力的可用性和明智使用。从20世纪中期到2013- 2014年,印度见证了从传统农业流程到机械化流程的巨大转变。如今,88%的农业动力来自拖拉机、柴油机泵机组、电动泵机组和动力分蘖机(2013- 2014年)。此外,印度已成为世界上最大的拖拉机生产国,其次是美国和中国。但是随着时间的推移,印度的农业机械化,尤其是拖拉机的使用是如何发展的呢?拖拉机需求的主要驱动因素是什么?从使用小时数/年的角度来看,拖拉机的使用效率如何?考虑到拖拉机的高成本,看看它们在多大程度上渗透到小型和边缘控股公司,即包容性、财务可行性和可持续性问题,也是很有趣的。这些是本研究要解决的一些关键问题。我们的分析表明,印度的农业机械化,特别是拖拉机的使用,取得了值得称赞的进步。随着重大政策变化、私营农机制造公司的进入和外国合作,农场电力供应从1951年的0.25千瓦/公顷增加到2017年的2.02千瓦/公顷。此外,机械化来源对农业动力的贡献从1951年的约3%增加到2013- 2014年的88%,取代了人力和水能。此外,拖拉机的产量从1951年的880台大幅增加到2019年的90万台左右。这使印度从20世纪60年代和70年代的拖拉机净进口国转变为拖拉机出口国,2019年出口了约9.2万台拖拉机。在包容性方面,尽管规模较大的农场机械化程度更高,但投入普查数据(2011-12年)显示,即使在小规模和边际种植(小于2公顷)类别中,平均约有44%的农民使用农业机械(如拖拉机、柴油机泵组、电动泵组和动力播种机)。这是一个很好的成就,但进一步的改进总是可能的,在海关招聘中心(CHCs)的大力政策支持下,这一方向的重大尝试已经在进行中。然而,农业机械昂贵的事实也引起了人们的担忧,即拥有和在小农农场使用农业机械在经济上是否可行和可持续。因此,重要的是要通过“chc”和“优步化”模式来看待正在展开的农业机械服务创新。这些创新使农业机械和设备完全可分割,以“按次付费”的价格为所有阶层的农民提供上门服务。这似乎是印度农业机械使用的未来,如果它被发展为一种可持续的商业模式,并得到适当的政策和财政支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural and Food Science
Agricultural and Food Science 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Food Science (AFSci) publishes original research reports on agriculture and food research related to primary production and which have a northern dimension. The fields within the scope of the journal include agricultural economics, agricultural engineering, animal science, environmental science, horticulture, plant and soil science and primary production-related food science. Papers covering both basic and applied research are welcome. AFSci is published by the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland. AFSci, former The Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland, has been published regularly since 1928. Alongside the printed version, online publishing began in 2000. Since the year 2010 Agricultural and Food Science has only been available online as an Open Access journal, provided to the user free of charge. Full texts are available online from 1945 on.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the effects of wilting, mixing with timothy and silage additive application on red clover silage quality Can strip cropping reduce pest activity density and damage while increasing yield? A case study of organic cabbage and faba bean Gypsum amendment influences soil and plant chemical composition temporarily Long-term effects of liming on crop yield, plant diseases, soil structure and risk of phosphorus leaching First observations of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) suggest that it is a transient species in Finland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1