Innovation in EU competition law : The resource-based view and disruption

F. Costa-Cabral
{"title":"Innovation in EU competition law : The resource-based view and disruption","authors":"F. Costa-Cabral","doi":"10.1093/YEL/YEY019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation has so far been handled by competition law according to market structure, that is, by assuming that market power also allows undertakings to evade the competitive pressures that spur innovation. This structural approach has fitted innovation into a tried-and-tested analytical and normative framework. Its limits have nonetheless become apparent as competition law is increasingly hemmed in by a static outlook and is called on to apply no harm to innovation unrelated to market power. As such, this paper proposes complementing a structural approach with two advances from strategic management studies. The first advance is the ‘resource-based view’, which connects competitive advantage with firm heterogeneity. Since undertakings do not have the same capabilities, the exit of innovators from the market might not be compensated for by the entry of equally innovating undertakings even if barriers to entry are low. Harm to innovation is thus centred on assets granting ‘innovation capabilities’, such as intellectual property or pipeline products. Cases of abusive refusal to license and mergers of parallel research show that rival claims over these assets are to be resolved based on differences in those innovation capabilities. The second advance is the theory of disruptive innovation, which explains major changes in consumer preferences and production methods. Strategic management has established that an inefficient start is an integral part of disruption, allowing disruptors to be ignored until their productive efficiency increases enough to shift the market. This contrasts with the notion of competition on the merits allowing the exclusion of less efficient competitors. Competition law must therefore adapt to strategies which do not show an effect on market structure, notably the higher prices of market power, but which are aimed at preventing disruptive innovation from occurring.","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"20 1","pages":"305-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/YEL/YEY019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Innovation has so far been handled by competition law according to market structure, that is, by assuming that market power also allows undertakings to evade the competitive pressures that spur innovation. This structural approach has fitted innovation into a tried-and-tested analytical and normative framework. Its limits have nonetheless become apparent as competition law is increasingly hemmed in by a static outlook and is called on to apply no harm to innovation unrelated to market power. As such, this paper proposes complementing a structural approach with two advances from strategic management studies. The first advance is the ‘resource-based view’, which connects competitive advantage with firm heterogeneity. Since undertakings do not have the same capabilities, the exit of innovators from the market might not be compensated for by the entry of equally innovating undertakings even if barriers to entry are low. Harm to innovation is thus centred on assets granting ‘innovation capabilities’, such as intellectual property or pipeline products. Cases of abusive refusal to license and mergers of parallel research show that rival claims over these assets are to be resolved based on differences in those innovation capabilities. The second advance is the theory of disruptive innovation, which explains major changes in consumer preferences and production methods. Strategic management has established that an inefficient start is an integral part of disruption, allowing disruptors to be ignored until their productive efficiency increases enough to shift the market. This contrasts with the notion of competition on the merits allowing the exclusion of less efficient competitors. Competition law must therefore adapt to strategies which do not show an effect on market structure, notably the higher prices of market power, but which are aimed at preventing disruptive innovation from occurring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟竞争法的创新:资源基础观与颠覆
迄今为止,竞争法根据市场结构来处理创新,也就是说,假设市场力量也允许企业逃避刺激创新的竞争压力。这种结构性方法将创新纳入了一个久经考验的分析和规范框架。然而,随着竞争法日益受到静态前景的束缚,并被要求对与市场力量无关的创新不加损害,它的局限性已变得显而易见。因此,本文建议用战略管理研究的两项进展来补充结构性方法。第一个进步是“资源基础观”,它将竞争优势与企业异质性联系起来。由于企业不具有相同的能力,即使进入壁垒很低,创新者退出市场也可能不会被同样创新的企业进入市场所补偿。因此,对创新的损害集中在赋予“创新能力”的资产上,比如知识产权或管道产品。滥用拒绝许可和合并平行研究的案例表明,对这些资产的竞争主张应根据这些创新能力的差异来解决。第二个进步是破坏性创新理论,它解释了消费者偏好和生产方法的重大变化。战略管理已经确定,低效率的开始是颠覆性的一个组成部分,允许颠覆者被忽略,直到他们的生产效率提高到足以改变市场。这与允许排除效率较低的竞争者的按价值竞争的概念形成对比。因此,竞争法必须适应那些对市场结构没有影响的战略,特别是市场力量的更高价格,但这些战略旨在防止破坏性创新的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
The unified patent court Corporate tax reform in the European Union: are the stars finally aligned? Rescuing transparency in the digital economy: in search of a common notion in EU consumer and data protection law The impact of the Digital Content Directive on online platforms’ Terms of Service The European Union’s Preferential Trade Agreements: between convergence and differentiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1