Sex differences of cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters in cardiac output prediction for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Zuogang Wang, Zi-Long Zhao, Y. Huang, Liang Yu, Qinhua Zhao, S. Gong, P. Yuan, Jinming Liu
{"title":"Sex differences of cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters in cardiac output prediction for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension","authors":"Zuogang Wang, Zi-Long Zhao, Y. Huang, Liang Yu, Qinhua Zhao, S. Gong, P. Yuan, Jinming Liu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN131368-20190327-00438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the sex differences of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters in cardiac output (CO) prediction for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). \n \n \nMethods \nFrom May 2010 to February 2016, 73 cases (32 males and 41 females) with CTEPH were enrolled from Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, all of whom underwent both right-heart catheterization and CPET.Multivariate regression analysis was applied to assess the prognostic value of CPET parameters. \n \n \nResults \nSex differences were of no significance in both demographic and hemodynamic parameters in total patients, but younger in female patients.Male patients had higher O2 pulse at anaerobic threshold (AT), peak minute ventilation (VE), end-tidal partial pressure of oxygen output (PETO2) at AT, peak O2 pulse, VE at AT and nadir VE/carbon dioxide (VCO2), but lower oxygen uptake efficiency slope compared with female patients (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in CPET parameters between male event group and male event-free group, but peak oxygen uptake(VO2)in female event group was lower than that in female event-free group (P<0.05). Female event group had lower peak VO2, VE at AT and peak VE compared to the male event group (all P<0.05). Nadir VE/VCO2 and peak PETO2 were independent predictors of CO for male and female CTEPH patients, respectively. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe independent predictors of CPET parameters are different in the assessment of CO in male and female CTEPH patients, which suggests that sex differences of CPET should be considered to be the better clinical assessment of CTEPH patients. \n \n \nKey words: \nChronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; Cardiopulmonary exercise testing; Sex characteristic; Cardiac output","PeriodicalId":10004,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Asthma","volume":"10 1","pages":"411-416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN131368-20190327-00438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the sex differences of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters in cardiac output (CO) prediction for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Methods From May 2010 to February 2016, 73 cases (32 males and 41 females) with CTEPH were enrolled from Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, all of whom underwent both right-heart catheterization and CPET.Multivariate regression analysis was applied to assess the prognostic value of CPET parameters. Results Sex differences were of no significance in both demographic and hemodynamic parameters in total patients, but younger in female patients.Male patients had higher O2 pulse at anaerobic threshold (AT), peak minute ventilation (VE), end-tidal partial pressure of oxygen output (PETO2) at AT, peak O2 pulse, VE at AT and nadir VE/carbon dioxide (VCO2), but lower oxygen uptake efficiency slope compared with female patients (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in CPET parameters between male event group and male event-free group, but peak oxygen uptake(VO2)in female event group was lower than that in female event-free group (P<0.05). Female event group had lower peak VO2, VE at AT and peak VE compared to the male event group (all P<0.05). Nadir VE/VCO2 and peak PETO2 were independent predictors of CO for male and female CTEPH patients, respectively. Conclusions The independent predictors of CPET parameters are different in the assessment of CO in male and female CTEPH patients, which suggests that sex differences of CPET should be considered to be the better clinical assessment of CTEPH patients. Key words: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; Cardiopulmonary exercise testing; Sex characteristic; Cardiac output
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压患者心输出量预测中心肺运动试验参数的性别差异
目的探讨慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)患者心输出量(CO)预测中心肺运动试验(CPET)参数的性别差异。方法选取2010年5月至2016年2月上海肺科医院收治的73例CTEPH患者(男32例,女41例),均行右心导管置管和CPET。采用多因素回归分析评价CPET参数的预后价值。结果患者总体人口学和血流动力学参数性别差异无统计学意义,但女性患者年龄差异明显。男性患者无氧阈值(at) O2脉搏、分钟通气量(VE)峰值、潮汐末氧输出分压(PETO2)、at O2脉搏峰值、VE和最低点VE/ co2 (VCO2)均高于女性患者,但吸氧效率斜率低于女性患者(均P<0.05)。男性事件组与无事件组CPET参数差异无统计学意义,但女性事件组的峰值摄氧量(VO2)低于无事件组(P<0.05)。女性事件组的VO2峰值、at时VE和VE峰值均低于男性事件组(均P<0.05)。Nadir VE/VCO2和峰值PETO2分别是男性和女性CTEPH患者CO的独立预测因子。结论CPET参数的独立预测因子在评价男女CTEPH患者CO时存在差异,提示CPET的性别差异可作为CTEPH患者较好的临床评价指标。关键词:慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压;心肺运动试验;性特征;心输出量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research progress of obstructive sleep apneahypopnea syndrome and coronary heart disease The relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and optic neuropathy Correlationship between oxidative damage and IP-10, Rantes in lung cancer patients Correlation between NADPH oxidase 4 and epithelial mesenchymal transformation in non-small cell lung cancer Efficacy and safety of intravenous antibiotics combined with inhalation of amikacin versus intravenous antibiotics for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1