Remarks on the Anonymous Collective Sponsorships in Post-Byzantine Epirus (Greece): The Case of an Eighteenth-Century Painting Workshop

Katerina Kontopanagou, Vasiliki Koutsou, Foteini Tsakmaki
{"title":"Remarks on the Anonymous Collective Sponsorships in Post-Byzantine Epirus (Greece): The Case of an Eighteenth-Century Painting Workshop","authors":"Katerina Kontopanagou, Vasiliki Koutsou, Foteini Tsakmaki","doi":"10.29302/auash.2021.25.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Co-operative patronage is based on the joint effort of individuals, lay or clerical, couples, families, colleagues, ecclesiastical and military authorities, or fellow citizens. Through the donor inscriptions are revealed the different categories of such co-operative patronage in Byzantine and Post-Byzantine society. In the Greek-speaking Post-Byzantine world, such types of anonymous groups of donors and benefactors most often came from a community as a whole, or certain inhabitants of a region, while collective donations by groups of monks were also widespread. The present paper examines the practice of anonymous collective sponsorships in Post-Byzantine Epirus, presenting the surviving monuments from the sixteenth to the seventeenth century and, in detail, the cases of anonymous collective sponsorships in a specific painting workshop of the eighteenth century, that of the so-called Kapesovite painters. In Post-Byzantine period the special privileges from the Ottomans and the development of trade, contributed to the Epirus’s cultural development. The tectonic transformations in the residential network of Epirus began in the late sixteenth century and increased after the seventeenth century. During the eighteenth century, the flourishing of Post-Byzantine art is a fact, indicating the gradual rise to prevalence of the parishes and the communities over the monastic establishments and individual donors. The financial and commercial privileges, especially after the treaty of Kucuk Kaynarca (1774), contributed decisively to religious monuments’ construction or renovation. The financial circumstances and the social cohesion of the Orthodox Christians in Epirus favored the increase of anonymous collective sponsorship in the eighteenth century. The monuments of that period evidence a significant amount of co-operative patronage, in which “anonymity” starred among the donors. The anonymous collective sponsorships indicates the community’s cohesion and the benefactor’s desire to create a legacy for future generations.","PeriodicalId":38216,"journal":{"name":"Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29302/auash.2021.25.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-operative patronage is based on the joint effort of individuals, lay or clerical, couples, families, colleagues, ecclesiastical and military authorities, or fellow citizens. Through the donor inscriptions are revealed the different categories of such co-operative patronage in Byzantine and Post-Byzantine society. In the Greek-speaking Post-Byzantine world, such types of anonymous groups of donors and benefactors most often came from a community as a whole, or certain inhabitants of a region, while collective donations by groups of monks were also widespread. The present paper examines the practice of anonymous collective sponsorships in Post-Byzantine Epirus, presenting the surviving monuments from the sixteenth to the seventeenth century and, in detail, the cases of anonymous collective sponsorships in a specific painting workshop of the eighteenth century, that of the so-called Kapesovite painters. In Post-Byzantine period the special privileges from the Ottomans and the development of trade, contributed to the Epirus’s cultural development. The tectonic transformations in the residential network of Epirus began in the late sixteenth century and increased after the seventeenth century. During the eighteenth century, the flourishing of Post-Byzantine art is a fact, indicating the gradual rise to prevalence of the parishes and the communities over the monastic establishments and individual donors. The financial and commercial privileges, especially after the treaty of Kucuk Kaynarca (1774), contributed decisively to religious monuments’ construction or renovation. The financial circumstances and the social cohesion of the Orthodox Christians in Epirus favored the increase of anonymous collective sponsorship in the eighteenth century. The monuments of that period evidence a significant amount of co-operative patronage, in which “anonymity” starred among the donors. The anonymous collective sponsorships indicates the community’s cohesion and the benefactor’s desire to create a legacy for future generations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后拜占庭时期伊庇鲁斯(希腊)匿名集体赞助刍议:以一个十八世纪绘画工作室为例
合作赞助是基于个人、平信徒或神职人员、夫妻、家庭、同事、教会和军事当局或公民的共同努力。通过捐助者铭文揭示了拜占庭和后拜占庭社会中这种合作赞助的不同类别。在讲希腊语的后拜占庭世界中,这种匿名的捐赠者和捐助者群体通常来自一个整体社区,或者一个地区的某些居民,而僧侣群体的集体捐赠也很普遍。本文考察了后拜占庭时期伊庇鲁斯的匿名集体赞助实践,展示了16世纪至17世纪幸存的纪念碑,并详细介绍了18世纪一个特定绘画工作室的匿名集体赞助案例,即所谓的卡佩索维派画家。后拜占庭时期,来自奥斯曼帝国的特权和贸易的发展促进了伊庇鲁斯的文化发展。伊庇鲁斯居民网络的结构性转变始于16世纪晚期,并在17世纪后有所增加。在18世纪,后拜占庭艺术的繁荣是一个事实,表明教区和社区在修道院机构和个人捐助者的普及程度逐渐上升。金融和商业特权,特别是在Kucuk Kaynarca条约(1774年)之后,对宗教纪念碑的建造或翻新做出了决定性的贡献。在18世纪,伊庇鲁斯东正教教徒的财政状况和社会凝聚力有利于匿名集体赞助的增加。那个时期的纪念碑证明了大量的合作赞助,其中“匿名”是捐助者的主要特征。匿名的集体赞助表明了社区的凝聚力和捐助者为子孙后代创造遗产的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica
Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Context of the First Romanian Translations Revisited Evolution of the Network of Religious Schools in Ung County in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries The Reformed College of Alba Iulia - Sárospatak In the Web of Arguments and Interests: Debate in Vienna on the Introduction of the Subject Teacher System Russian Icon Marketing in Transylvania as a Means of Political and Social Destabilization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1