The aftereffect of winter wheat on pea yield, nitrogen surplus and nitrogen use efficiency in different cropping systems

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural and Food Science Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.23986/afsci.89726
Ivo Voor, M. Alaru, V. Eremeev, E. Loit
{"title":"The aftereffect of winter wheat on pea yield, nitrogen surplus and nitrogen use efficiency in different cropping systems","authors":"Ivo Voor, M. Alaru, V. Eremeev, E. Loit","doi":"10.23986/afsci.89726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study is part of a framework for researching the use of the field pea in cropping systems in order to improve its economic and environmental output. The specific aim was to investigate the effect of differently fertilised preceding winter wheat on subsequent field pea output in the same crop rotation. The field experiment was conducted in Tartu county, Estonia, in 2012–2017. Seven different cropping systems were investigated: four conventional with different treatments of mineral nitrogen fertilisers and three organic including catch crops and cattle manure treatment. The DM yield of field pea in winter wheat mineral N treatments 50–150 kg N ha-1 was 2699– 2852 kg ha-1, which was 33% higher than in the organic systems. There were no significant differences (p < 0.05) in nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and N surplus between 50–150 kg N ha-1. The first 20 kg ha-1 mineral N with P25 and K95 gave a significantly higher pea yield compared to the treatment without mineral N. The catch crops reduced agronomic NUE and increased N surplus in the organic cropping systems.","PeriodicalId":7393,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Food Science","volume":"116 1","pages":"494-504"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.89726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study is part of a framework for researching the use of the field pea in cropping systems in order to improve its economic and environmental output. The specific aim was to investigate the effect of differently fertilised preceding winter wheat on subsequent field pea output in the same crop rotation. The field experiment was conducted in Tartu county, Estonia, in 2012–2017. Seven different cropping systems were investigated: four conventional with different treatments of mineral nitrogen fertilisers and three organic including catch crops and cattle manure treatment. The DM yield of field pea in winter wheat mineral N treatments 50–150 kg N ha-1 was 2699– 2852 kg ha-1, which was 33% higher than in the organic systems. There were no significant differences (p < 0.05) in nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and N surplus between 50–150 kg N ha-1. The first 20 kg ha-1 mineral N with P25 and K95 gave a significantly higher pea yield compared to the treatment without mineral N. The catch crops reduced agronomic NUE and increased N surplus in the organic cropping systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冬小麦对不同种植制度下豌豆产量、氮肥剩余量及氮肥利用效率的后效效应
本研究是研究在种植系统中使用大田豌豆以提高其经济和环境产量的框架的一部分。具体目的是研究在同一作物轮作中,前茬冬小麦不同施肥对随后大田豌豆产量的影响。田间试验于2012-2017年在爱沙尼亚塔尔图县进行。研究了7种不同的种植制度:4种常规种植制度采用不同的无机氮肥处理,3种有机种植制度包括捕捞作物和牛粪处理。在50 ~ 150 kg N ha-1的冬小麦矿质氮处理下,大田豌豆DM产量为2699 ~ 2852 kg ha-1,比有机处理提高33%。在50 ~ 150 kg N ha-1之间,氮素利用效率(NUE)和氮素剩余量无显著差异(p < 0.05)。施用P25和K95的前20 kg ha-1矿质氮显著高于不施用矿质氮的处理,捕获作物降低了有机种植系统的农艺氮肥利用效率,增加了氮肥剩余。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural and Food Science
Agricultural and Food Science 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Food Science (AFSci) publishes original research reports on agriculture and food research related to primary production and which have a northern dimension. The fields within the scope of the journal include agricultural economics, agricultural engineering, animal science, environmental science, horticulture, plant and soil science and primary production-related food science. Papers covering both basic and applied research are welcome. AFSci is published by the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland. AFSci, former The Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland, has been published regularly since 1928. Alongside the printed version, online publishing began in 2000. Since the year 2010 Agricultural and Food Science has only been available online as an Open Access journal, provided to the user free of charge. Full texts are available online from 1945 on.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the effects of wilting, mixing with timothy and silage additive application on red clover silage quality Can strip cropping reduce pest activity density and damage while increasing yield? A case study of organic cabbage and faba bean Gypsum amendment influences soil and plant chemical composition temporarily Long-term effects of liming on crop yield, plant diseases, soil structure and risk of phosphorus leaching First observations of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) suggest that it is a transient species in Finland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1