Correlation of Handedness with Hand Shape Index in Right Hander and Left Hander Medical Students of Bangladesh

M. Rahman, Zubaida Gulshan Ara, Anjuman Ara, R. Parveen, Zeenatul Momena, Irin Parven, T. Begum
{"title":"Correlation of Handedness with Hand Shape Index in Right Hander and Left Hander Medical Students of Bangladesh","authors":"M. Rahman, Zubaida Gulshan Ara, Anjuman Ara, R. Parveen, Zeenatul Momena, Irin Parven, T. Begum","doi":"10.3329/cbmj.v11i1.60263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This cross-sectional, analytical type of study was performed in Department of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College, Bangladesh, from July 2016 to June 2017 on 52 right hander male and 52 right hander female, 40 left hander male and 34 left hander female Bangladeshi medical students. Convenient purposive sampling technique was adopted. History of any injury of upper limb was excluded to construct standard measurement. Handedness of each medical student was determined by the Edinburgh handedness inventory. Hand breadth and hand length was measured with the help of vernier caliper. Paired and unpaired student‟s „t‟ test and Pearson‟s correlation coefficient test were done for statistical analyses. Handedness score showed nonsignificant positive correlation with right hand shape index (r = +0.087, P>0.05) and left-hand shape index (r = +0.008, P>0.05) in right hander males. Handedness score showed non-significant negative correlation with right hand shape index (r = -0.017, P>0.05) and left-hand shape index (r = -0.003, P>0.05) in right hander females. Handedness score showed non-significant negative correlation with right hand shape index (r= - 0.210, P>0.05) and left-hand shape index (r = -0.247, P>0.05) in left hander males. Handedness score showed non-significant positive correlation with right hand shape index (r= +0.051, P>0.05) and left-hand shape index (r = +0.213, P>0.05) in left hander females. To summarize, handedness score showed nonsignificant positive correlation with right hand shape index and left-hand shape index in right hander males and left hander females. However, handedness score showed non-significant negative correlation with right hand shape index and left-hand shape index in right hander females and left hander males. \nCBMJ 2022 January: vol. 11 no. 01 P: 14-20","PeriodicalId":10576,"journal":{"name":"Community Based Medical Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Based Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/cbmj.v11i1.60263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cross-sectional, analytical type of study was performed in Department of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College, Bangladesh, from July 2016 to June 2017 on 52 right hander male and 52 right hander female, 40 left hander male and 34 left hander female Bangladeshi medical students. Convenient purposive sampling technique was adopted. History of any injury of upper limb was excluded to construct standard measurement. Handedness of each medical student was determined by the Edinburgh handedness inventory. Hand breadth and hand length was measured with the help of vernier caliper. Paired and unpaired student‟s „t‟ test and Pearson‟s correlation coefficient test were done for statistical analyses. Handedness score showed nonsignificant positive correlation with right hand shape index (r = +0.087, P>0.05) and left-hand shape index (r = +0.008, P>0.05) in right hander males. Handedness score showed non-significant negative correlation with right hand shape index (r = -0.017, P>0.05) and left-hand shape index (r = -0.003, P>0.05) in right hander females. Handedness score showed non-significant negative correlation with right hand shape index (r= - 0.210, P>0.05) and left-hand shape index (r = -0.247, P>0.05) in left hander males. Handedness score showed non-significant positive correlation with right hand shape index (r= +0.051, P>0.05) and left-hand shape index (r = +0.213, P>0.05) in left hander females. To summarize, handedness score showed nonsignificant positive correlation with right hand shape index and left-hand shape index in right hander males and left hander females. However, handedness score showed non-significant negative correlation with right hand shape index and left-hand shape index in right hander females and left hander males. CBMJ 2022 January: vol. 11 no. 01 P: 14-20
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉医学生左、右利手性与手型指数的相关性
这项横断面分析型研究于2016年7月至2017年6月在孟加拉国达卡医学院解剖学系对52名男右撇子和52名女右撇子、40名男左撇子和34名女左撇子的孟加拉国医学生进行。采用方便的目的抽样技术。排除上肢任何损伤史来构建标准测量。每个医学生的利手性由爱丁堡利手性量表测定。用游标卡尺测量手宽和手长。采用配对和非配对学生s“t”检验和Pearson相关系数检验进行统计分析。利手性得分与右撇子男性右手形状指数(r = +0.087, P>0.05)和左手形状指数(r = +0.008, P>0.05)呈显著正相关。女性右撇子的利手性得分与右手形状指数(r = -0.017, P>0.05)和左手形状指数(r = -0.003, P>0.05)呈显著负相关。利手性得分与左撇子男性右手形状指数(r= - 0.210, P>0.05)和左手形状指数(r= -0.247, P>0.05)呈显著负相关。惯用手性得分与左撇子女性右手形状指数(r= +0.051, P>0.05)和左手形状指数(r= +0.213, P>0.05)呈非显著正相关。综上所述,男性右撇子和女性左撇子的利手性得分与右手形状指数和左手形状指数呈不显著正相关。而女性右撇子和男性左撇子的利手性得分与右手形状指数和左手形状指数呈不显著负相关。《中国医学杂志》2022年1月第11期[01:14 . 20
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Topical Cyclosporine A (0.05%) in Treatment of Corneal Subepithelial Infiltrates after Adenoviral Keratoconjunctivitis Characterization of Axillary Lymph Nodes Using Conventional Ultrasonography Compared with Histopathological Findings Correlation between the Maximum Length and the Weight of the Human Humerus Bone Cognitive Performance of the Elderly People in an Urban Area of Bangladesh: A Sociodemographic Study Pelvic Stress Fracture among Naval Cadets in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1