Academic Review of Suspicions of the Deniers of the Revelation

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2018-06-15 DOI:10.33195/UOCHJRS-V1I2712018
Irshad Ullah, Sayed Attaullah Bukhari
{"title":"Academic Review of Suspicions of the Deniers of the Revelation","authors":"Irshad Ullah, Sayed Attaullah Bukhari","doi":"10.33195/UOCHJRS-V1I2712018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The verses of the holy Qur’an were revealed in a sequence and this sequence end with the completion of the whole process of revelation when the Holy Scripture was presented to the holy prophet as a sole and single whole book of guidance. Right from the outset it has been under close scrutiny of both the Muslims and non-believers. While the non-believers have always been skeptical about the truthfulness of the divine message. The Muslim on the other hand served a great cause of passing on to the people what Allah (SWT) termed as a source of guidance and treasure of knowledge. The word revelation itself stands for a message from God which He conveyed to the prophet in different ways. Sometimes the message comes through the angel Gabriel and at other times through hints and clue. This sort of communication between God and man is believed to have been in tradition in other religions as well and the concept of avacke in Greek methodology is a glaring example of this belief. However, with the development of science, a group of western thinkers denied the genuineness of revelation, but surprisingly most of these skeptics were either etheists or Pagans who had least to do with religion and the sole purpose was to mislead or misguide the public about the divine message. They also raised doubts about the authorship of the Holy Qur’an and some even designated the holy prophet (SAW) as the writer. In this article, the doubts of the skeptics or non-belivers, which depicted a prejudicial picture of the Qur’Én, have been criticaly analyzed.\n\nKeywords: Wahi, Qur’an, Clement Hawart, Orientalist, Islam","PeriodicalId":44102,"journal":{"name":"JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33195/UOCHJRS-V1I2712018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The verses of the holy Qur’an were revealed in a sequence and this sequence end with the completion of the whole process of revelation when the Holy Scripture was presented to the holy prophet as a sole and single whole book of guidance. Right from the outset it has been under close scrutiny of both the Muslims and non-believers. While the non-believers have always been skeptical about the truthfulness of the divine message. The Muslim on the other hand served a great cause of passing on to the people what Allah (SWT) termed as a source of guidance and treasure of knowledge. The word revelation itself stands for a message from God which He conveyed to the prophet in different ways. Sometimes the message comes through the angel Gabriel and at other times through hints and clue. This sort of communication between God and man is believed to have been in tradition in other religions as well and the concept of avacke in Greek methodology is a glaring example of this belief. However, with the development of science, a group of western thinkers denied the genuineness of revelation, but surprisingly most of these skeptics were either etheists or Pagans who had least to do with religion and the sole purpose was to mislead or misguide the public about the divine message. They also raised doubts about the authorship of the Holy Qur’an and some even designated the holy prophet (SAW) as the writer. In this article, the doubts of the skeptics or non-belivers, which depicted a prejudicial picture of the Qur’Én, have been criticaly analyzed. Keywords: Wahi, Qur’an, Clement Hawart, Orientalist, Islam
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对《启示录》否认者怀疑的学术评论
神圣的《古兰经》的经文是按顺序启示的,这个顺序随着整个启示过程的完成而结束,当《圣经》作为一本唯一的完整的指导书呈现给神圣的先知时。从一开始,它就受到穆斯林和非信徒的密切关注。而非信徒一直对神信息的真实性持怀疑态度。另一方面,穆斯林在向人们传递安拉(SWT)所称的指导和知识宝藏的伟大事业中发挥了重要作用。“启示”这个词本身代表着上帝以不同的方式传达给先知的信息。有时信息通过天使加百列而来,有时通过暗示和线索而来。这种神与人之间的交流被认为也存在于其他宗教的传统中,希腊方法论中的avacke概念就是这种信仰的一个明显例子。然而,随着科学的发展,一群西方思想家否认了启示的真实性,但令人惊讶的是,这些怀疑论者中的大多数要么是无神论者,要么是异教徒,他们与宗教无关,唯一的目的是误导或误导公众对神的信息。他们还对神圣的《古兰经》的作者提出质疑,有些人甚至指定神圣的先知(SAW)为作者。在这篇文章中,怀疑者或非信仰者的怀疑,描绘了古兰经Én的偏见画面,已被批判性地分析。关键词:瓦伊,古兰经,克莱门特·哈瓦特,东方主义者,伊斯兰教
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Religious Studies is a peer-reviewed journal registered as an Open Access Journal with all content freely downloadable. The journal began in 1960 as Contemporary Religions in Japan, which was changed to the JJRS in 1974. It has been published by the Nanzan Institute since 1981. The JJRS aims for a multidisciplinary approach to the study of religion in Japan, and submissions are welcomed from scholars in all fields of the humanities and social sciences. To submit a manuscript or inquiry about publishing in our journal, please contact us at the address below.
期刊最新文献
Review of: Timothy O. Benedict, <em>Spiritual Ends: Religion and the Heart of Dying in Japan</em> On the Verge of Damnation and Buddhahood: Motherhood, Female Corporeality, and Koan Exegesis Japanese Buddhist War Support and the <em>Kanchō</em> System Opening the Curtains on Popular Practice: <em>Kaichō</em> in the Meiji and Taisho Periods Review of: Paul Groner, <em>Precepts, Ordinations, and Practice in Medieval Japanese Tendai</em>
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1