The impact of external and internal corporate governance mechanisms on agency costs

J. Schäuble
{"title":"The impact of external and internal corporate governance mechanisms on agency costs","authors":"J. Schäuble","doi":"10.1108/CG-02-2018-0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of external and internal corporate governance mechanisms on agency costs.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe author uses data from German firms that were listed in the regulated market of the Frankfurt Stock exchange during 2006-2011. Agency costs were measured using stochastic frontier analysis, a relatively new approach to estimate agency costs. The regression analysis is applied to test the model.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate that an industry specialized audit firm, the presence of a large audit firm, abnormal audit fees, management ownership and variable management compensation are significantly negatively associated with the level of a firms’ agency costs. In contrast, this seems not to be true for the existence of an audit committee for which the results of the paper document a non-significant association.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper contributes to the existing literature in several ways. First, the research design is to the best of the authors’ knowledge the first that investigates the influence of different corporate governance mechanisms on the level of agency costs. Second, previous studies are mainly focused on the US audit market. This focus on the US audit market leaves uncertainties regarding the direction and magnitude of the empirical relationship in the European and German environmental context. Finally, the paper provides initial empirical evidence for a sample of German IFRS listed companies (IFRS – International Financial Reporting Standards).\n","PeriodicalId":47880,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance-The International Journal of Business in Society","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance-The International Journal of Business in Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2018-0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of external and internal corporate governance mechanisms on agency costs. Design/methodology/approach The author uses data from German firms that were listed in the regulated market of the Frankfurt Stock exchange during 2006-2011. Agency costs were measured using stochastic frontier analysis, a relatively new approach to estimate agency costs. The regression analysis is applied to test the model. Findings The results indicate that an industry specialized audit firm, the presence of a large audit firm, abnormal audit fees, management ownership and variable management compensation are significantly negatively associated with the level of a firms’ agency costs. In contrast, this seems not to be true for the existence of an audit committee for which the results of the paper document a non-significant association. Originality/value The paper contributes to the existing literature in several ways. First, the research design is to the best of the authors’ knowledge the first that investigates the influence of different corporate governance mechanisms on the level of agency costs. Second, previous studies are mainly focused on the US audit market. This focus on the US audit market leaves uncertainties regarding the direction and magnitude of the empirical relationship in the European and German environmental context. Finally, the paper provides initial empirical evidence for a sample of German IFRS listed companies (IFRS – International Financial Reporting Standards).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外部和内部公司治理机制对代理成本的影响
目的研究外部和内部公司治理机制对代理成本的影响。设计/方法/方法作者使用了2006-2011年期间在法兰克福证券交易所受监管市场上市的德国公司的数据。采用随机前沿分析来衡量代理成本,这是一种相对较新的估算代理成本的方法。采用回归分析对模型进行检验。结果表明,行业专业化审计事务所、大型审计事务所的存在、异常审计费用、管理层所有权和可变管理层薪酬与事务所代理成本水平呈显著负相关。相比之下,对于审计委员会的存在而言,情况似乎并非如此,因为该文件的结果证明该委员会与审计委员会没有重大关联。原创性/价值本文在几个方面对现有文献有所贡献。首先,本文的研究设计是作者所知的第一个调查不同公司治理机制对代理成本水平影响的研究。其次,以往的研究主要集中在美国审计市场。这种对美国审计市场的关注,给欧洲和德国环境背景下的实证关系的方向和规模留下了不确定性。最后,本文以德国IFRS上市公司(IFRS - International Financial Reporting Standards)为样本提供了初步的经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
33.90%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Providing a consistent source of in-depth information, analysis and advice considering corporate governance on an international scale, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society focuses on knowledge development, practice and performance standards for scholars and Boards of Directors/ Governors of companies throughout the world. The journal publishes a diverse range of substantive theoretical and methodological debates as well as practical developments in the field of corporate governance worldwide. The journal particularly encourages attention to the impact of changes of business/corporate governance forms and practices on people, and the sustainability of different governance models. Articles that highlight models and structures that advance the interests, dignity and well being of all stakeholders, in a sustainable manner, are particularly welcome. The journal covers a broad spectrum of governance-related themes including: -Effective boardroom performance -Control and regulation -Executive leadership -The role and contribution of external (non-executive) directors -The growing importance of governance in the wake of ever-greater corporate scandals -Redefinitions and reassessments of corporate governance models -The role of business in society -The changing nature of the relationship and responsibilities of the firm towards various stakeholders -The incentives required to encourage more socially- and environmentally-responsible corporate action -The role and impact of local and international regulatory agencies and regimes on corporate behaviour.
期刊最新文献
Female leadership and ESG performance of firms: Nordic evidence Making the invisible visible: stakeholder capitalism and powerless stakeholders Corporate board, audit committee and earnings manipulation: does the corporate regulation matter? An emerging economy perspective The evolutionary journey of the American corporation and its governance over two centuries Sustainability reporting, board diversity, earnings management and financial statements readability: evidence from an emerging economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1