Comparison of queen honey bee colony migration with various MPPTs on photovoltaic system under shaded conditions

A. Aripriharta, Triawan Waskita Bayuanggara, I. Fadlika, S. Sujito, A. Afandi, N. Mufti, M. Diantoro, G. Horng
{"title":"Comparison of queen honey bee colony migration with various MPPTs on photovoltaic system under shaded conditions","authors":"A. Aripriharta, Triawan Waskita Bayuanggara, I. Fadlika, S. Sujito, A. Afandi, N. Mufti, M. Diantoro, G. Horng","doi":"10.21303/2461-4262.2023.002836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shaded conditions cause a decrease in the performance of photovoltaic (PV) systems. In this situation, the power versus voltage curve shows two maximum power points, namely local (LMPP) and global (GMPP). The main challenge for extracting the maximum power from a PV system during shading conditions is the existence of a false maximum or LMPP along with a true maximum or GMPP. Traditional maximum power point tracking (MPPT) has faced hurdles in overcoming the situation. Therefore, this paper describes the implementation of Queen Honey Bee Migration (or QHBM for short) to track GMPP of PV systems, which called QHBM MPPT. The highlight of this paper is the simulation results of QHBM MPPT on PV systems under various shading conditions. \nWe implemented QHBM MPPT on a boost converter installed on a 1200 Wp PV system. We conducted a simulation using MATLAB® with five scenarios which aim to show the various shadows that PV systems might encounter in reality. The MPPT QHBM is tested repeatedly and then the average value is taken to measure performance in MPP tracking. The average value is used to calculate tracking efficiency, number of iteration or convergence time. We also compared QHBM with other methods, namely incremental conductance (IC) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The results obtained show that the QHBM and PSO MPPTs outperform the IC MPPT in terms of efficiency, convergence time and the number of iterations. IC MPPTs oscillate under shading conditions since no knowledge of GMPP. Both PSO and QHBM MPPTs know GMPP from scouts or particles, respectively. Therefore, PSO and QHBM MPPTs are better than IC MPPT in various shading cases","PeriodicalId":11804,"journal":{"name":"EUREKA: Physics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUREKA: Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2023.002836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shaded conditions cause a decrease in the performance of photovoltaic (PV) systems. In this situation, the power versus voltage curve shows two maximum power points, namely local (LMPP) and global (GMPP). The main challenge for extracting the maximum power from a PV system during shading conditions is the existence of a false maximum or LMPP along with a true maximum or GMPP. Traditional maximum power point tracking (MPPT) has faced hurdles in overcoming the situation. Therefore, this paper describes the implementation of Queen Honey Bee Migration (or QHBM for short) to track GMPP of PV systems, which called QHBM MPPT. The highlight of this paper is the simulation results of QHBM MPPT on PV systems under various shading conditions. We implemented QHBM MPPT on a boost converter installed on a 1200 Wp PV system. We conducted a simulation using MATLAB® with five scenarios which aim to show the various shadows that PV systems might encounter in reality. The MPPT QHBM is tested repeatedly and then the average value is taken to measure performance in MPP tracking. The average value is used to calculate tracking efficiency, number of iteration or convergence time. We also compared QHBM with other methods, namely incremental conductance (IC) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The results obtained show that the QHBM and PSO MPPTs outperform the IC MPPT in terms of efficiency, convergence time and the number of iterations. IC MPPTs oscillate under shading conditions since no knowledge of GMPP. Both PSO and QHBM MPPTs know GMPP from scouts or particles, respectively. Therefore, PSO and QHBM MPPTs are better than IC MPPT in various shading cases
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遮荫条件下不同MPPTs对蜂群迁移的影响
遮荫条件会导致光伏(PV)系统性能下降。在这种情况下,功率与电压曲线显示两个最大功率点,即本地(LMPP)和全局(GMPP)。在遮阳条件下从光伏系统中提取最大功率的主要挑战是存在假最大值或LMPP以及真最大值或GMPP。传统的最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)在克服这种情况时遇到了障碍。因此,本文介绍了利用蜂王迁徙(Queen Bee Migration,简称QHBM)跟踪光伏系统GMPP的实现方法,称为QHBM MPPT。本文的重点是各种遮阳条件下QHBM MPPT在光伏系统上的模拟结果。我们在安装在1200 Wp光伏系统上的升压转换器上实现了QHBM MPPT。我们使用MATLAB®进行了五种场景的模拟,旨在展示PV系统在现实中可能遇到的各种阴影。对MPPT QHBM进行反复测试,然后取平均值来衡量MPP跟踪中的性能。平均值用于计算跟踪效率、迭代次数或收敛时间。我们还比较了QHBM与其他方法,即增量电导(IC)和粒子群优化(PSO)。结果表明,QHBM和PSO MPPT在效率、收敛时间和迭代次数方面都优于IC MPPT。由于不了解GMPP, IC MPPTs在遮阳条件下振荡。PSO和QHBM MPPTs分别从侦察兵或粒子中知道GMPP。因此,在各种遮阳情况下,PSO和QHBM MPPT都优于IC MPPT
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Application of the multi-criteria analysis method mairca, spotis, comet for the optimisation of sustainable electricity technology development Investigation and establishment of rational geometric factors of die in the deep drawing without a blank holder A rheophysical study of the non-newtonian behavior of water flow in thin channels Study of the influence of the technical level of railway vehicles on braking characteristics The study of the efficiency evaluation of the ventilation system of the poultry house in the summer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1