{"title":"Modele świadectwa: \"prze-pisywanie literatury Holokaustu\"","authors":"Joanna Nazimek","doi":"10.24917/20811853.17.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Models of testimony: “re-writing the Holocaust literature”AbstractThe article is a critical discussion of Pawel Wolski’s treatise titled Tadeusz Borowski – PrimoLevi. Prze-pisywanie literatury Holocaustu (Warsaw 2013). It is setting out selected aspects oftraversing of the researcher from Szczecin by considering the status of testimony literature.Also there is an emphasis put on the phenomenon of profiling using forms of utterancesin Holocaust discourse. The article shows two distinct strategies (analyzed by Wolski) ofautomodeling of writers’ own utterances: “towards” (Tadeusz Borowski) and “accordingto” (Primo Levi) preferred model of testimony shaped under the influence of contemporarypublic debate.Keywords: Tadeusz Borowski, Primo Levi, testimonial literature, Holocaust discourse","PeriodicalId":34769,"journal":{"name":"Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Historicolitteraria","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Historicolitteraria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20811853.17.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Models of testimony: “re-writing the Holocaust literature”AbstractThe article is a critical discussion of Pawel Wolski’s treatise titled Tadeusz Borowski – PrimoLevi. Prze-pisywanie literatury Holocaustu (Warsaw 2013). It is setting out selected aspects oftraversing of the researcher from Szczecin by considering the status of testimony literature.Also there is an emphasis put on the phenomenon of profiling using forms of utterancesin Holocaust discourse. The article shows two distinct strategies (analyzed by Wolski) ofautomodeling of writers’ own utterances: “towards” (Tadeusz Borowski) and “accordingto” (Primo Levi) preferred model of testimony shaped under the influence of contemporarypublic debate.Keywords: Tadeusz Borowski, Primo Levi, testimonial literature, Holocaust discourse
摘要本文对帕维尔·沃尔斯基的《博罗夫斯基—普里莫列维》作了批判性的论述。prize -pisywanie literature holocaust(2013年华沙)。它通过考虑证词文献的地位，列出了从什切青研究员穿越的选定方面。此外，还强调了在大屠杀话语中使用话语形式进行剖析的现象。这篇文章展示了作者自己话语的两种不同的自动建模策略(由Wolski分析):“朝向”(Tadeusz Borowski)和“根据”(Primo Levi)在当代公共辩论的影响下形成的首选证词模型。关键词:Tadeusz Borowski, Primo Levi，证言文学，大屠杀话语
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
