{"title":"Philosophy of everyday life","authors":"Valérie Aucouturier","doi":"10.15845/nwr.v11.3638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At Oxford University, in the context of WW2, when men were largely obliged to abandon the university benches to take part in the war effort, four women philosophers, Iris Murdoch (1919-1999), Mary Midgley (1919-2018), Elizabeth Anscombe (1919-2001) and Philippa Foot (1920-2010), formed a group of philosophical reflections that would become a competitor, after the war, to John L. Austin’s famous ‘Saturday Mornings’. At the heart of the concerns of this ‘wartime quartet’: putting the importance of being human back at the centre of ethics. They opposed “modern moral philosophy” and its many presuppositions, including the claim that ethical questions are independent of the facts of human life or concern a purely rational subject abstracted from everyday issues and from its belonging to the human species. By putting the importance of being human back at the heart of their ethical reflections, these philosophers came to reflect on issues that directly concern human life, far from the philosophical abstractions that interested their men homologues. In this paper, I explore the extent to which this re-inscription of philosophy into everyday life and into ordinary human concerns, opens the way to a feminist philosophy and ethics.","PeriodicalId":31828,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Wittgenstein Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Wittgenstein Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15845/nwr.v11.3638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
At Oxford University, in the context of WW2, when men were largely obliged to abandon the university benches to take part in the war effort, four women philosophers, Iris Murdoch (1919-1999), Mary Midgley (1919-2018), Elizabeth Anscombe (1919-2001) and Philippa Foot (1920-2010), formed a group of philosophical reflections that would become a competitor, after the war, to John L. Austin’s famous ‘Saturday Mornings’. At the heart of the concerns of this ‘wartime quartet’: putting the importance of being human back at the centre of ethics. They opposed “modern moral philosophy” and its many presuppositions, including the claim that ethical questions are independent of the facts of human life or concern a purely rational subject abstracted from everyday issues and from its belonging to the human species. By putting the importance of being human back at the heart of their ethical reflections, these philosophers came to reflect on issues that directly concern human life, far from the philosophical abstractions that interested their men homologues. In this paper, I explore the extent to which this re-inscription of philosophy into everyday life and into ordinary human concerns, opens the way to a feminist philosophy and ethics.
在牛津大学,在二战的背景下,当男性在很大程度上被迫放弃大学的长椅参加战争时,四位女哲学家,Iris Murdoch (1919-1999), Mary Midgley (1919-2018), Elizabeth Anscombe(1919-2001)和Philippa Foot(1920-2010),组成了一个哲学反思小组,在战争结束后,这将成为约翰·l·奥斯汀著名的“周六早晨”的竞争对手。这一“战时四重奏”关注的核心是:将做人的重要性重新置于伦理的中心。他们反对“现代道德哲学”及其许多预设,包括声称伦理问题独立于人类生活的事实,或涉及从日常问题中抽象出来的纯粹理性主体,以及它属于人类物种。通过将作为人的重要性重新置于他们伦理思考的核心,这些哲学家开始思考与人类生活直接相关的问题,而不是他们的男性同代人感兴趣的哲学抽象。在本文中,我探讨了这种将哲学重新铭刻到日常生活和普通人类关注的程度,为女性主义哲学和伦理学开辟了道路。