Spectres of agrarian territory in southern India

Pub Date : 2002-09-01 DOI:10.1177/001946460203900206
D. Ludden
{"title":"Spectres of agrarian territory in southern India","authors":"D. Ludden","doi":"10.1177/001946460203900206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The national imagination has had a long, productive career as our guide to historical research, but other modes of thought now need more nurturing. National maps mechanise research by putting all our data in their pre-assigned place. Spaces that elude the national sensibility disappear when scholars heap data from all times and places into national containers. All histories of the peoples in the world currently appear in the cage of some national past or another, but some need their own space. It is a pressing challenge to imagine at least some history in nonnational terms, particularly for scholars who want to write about old geographies that became spectres in a world of nations. These old geographies are spectral in several senses. Archaic and out of place in the present, they seem imaginary and only make sense inside routines of national mapping. Some are quaint and benign but others are scary spooks that conjure up places outside the national order of things. Eerie ghosts emerge when old geographies refuse to die yet resist substantiation. Some old and barely visible regions of human activity remain vital for people inside them. Spaces that offend national sensibilities stimulate intense cartographic anxiety, as for example among the Indian officials who censor and regulate the circulation of maps depicting ’border areas’ and ’sensitive regions’. Pakhtun territory, Bengali Assam, and Tamil IndoLanka are but three of the many old historical spaces whose living legacies haunt nations in South Asia.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001946460203900206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The national imagination has had a long, productive career as our guide to historical research, but other modes of thought now need more nurturing. National maps mechanise research by putting all our data in their pre-assigned place. Spaces that elude the national sensibility disappear when scholars heap data from all times and places into national containers. All histories of the peoples in the world currently appear in the cage of some national past or another, but some need their own space. It is a pressing challenge to imagine at least some history in nonnational terms, particularly for scholars who want to write about old geographies that became spectres in a world of nations. These old geographies are spectral in several senses. Archaic and out of place in the present, they seem imaginary and only make sense inside routines of national mapping. Some are quaint and benign but others are scary spooks that conjure up places outside the national order of things. Eerie ghosts emerge when old geographies refuse to die yet resist substantiation. Some old and barely visible regions of human activity remain vital for people inside them. Spaces that offend national sensibilities stimulate intense cartographic anxiety, as for example among the Indian officials who censor and regulate the circulation of maps depicting ’border areas’ and ’sensitive regions’. Pakhtun territory, Bengali Assam, and Tamil IndoLanka are but three of the many old historical spaces whose living legacies haunt nations in South Asia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
印度南部土地上的幽灵
作为我们历史研究的向导,民族想象力有着漫长而富有成效的历程,但其他思维模式现在需要更多的培育。国家地图通过将我们所有的数据放在预先指定的位置来机械化研究。当学者们把所有时间和地点的数据堆积到国家容器中时,逃避国家敏感性的空间就消失了。目前,世界上所有民族的历史都出现在这个或那个民族的过去的笼子里,但有些历史需要自己的空间。至少从非民族的角度来想象一些历史是一项紧迫的挑战,特别是对于那些想要写在民族世界中成为幽灵的古老地理的学者来说。从几个意义上说,这些古老的地理位置是模糊的。古老而不合时宜,它们似乎是想象出来的,只有在国家测绘的常规中才有意义。有些古怪而温和,但另一些则是可怕的幽灵,让人联想到国家秩序之外的地方。当古老的地理学拒绝消亡却又拒绝证实时,怪异的幽灵就会出现。一些古老的、几乎看不见的人类活动区域对里面的人来说仍然至关重要。冒犯民族情感的空间会引发强烈的制图焦虑,例如,印度官员审查和管制描绘“边境地区”和“敏感地区”的地图的流通。普什图地区、孟加拉阿萨姆邦和泰米尔IndoLanka只是众多古老历史空间中的三个,它们的生活遗产困扰着南亚国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1