Proactive Approach Minimizes Production Losses Due to Slug Flow

S. Carrie
{"title":"Proactive Approach Minimizes Production Losses Due to Slug Flow","authors":"S. Carrie","doi":"10.2118/199782-stu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n When wells producing up casing in the Marcellus Shale dip into the slug flow regime, their production begins to drop off significantly. In some instances, wells that begin slugging dramatically can defer the majority of the production that they were delivering just months before slugging, resulting in significant loss in present value. To remedy this complication, engineers can install tubing in these wells to help lift fluids through the vertical section. Because slugging causes large fluctuations in production, most slugging is identified and addressed only after a production engineer notices these fluctuations. This can be months after the decrease in production rate.\n To challenge this reactive approach to identifying wells ready for tubing installation, I created a workflow—implemented with software—to create a tubing installation schedule which requires little time or effort by the production engineer. While it is unlikely this program can be replicated exactly, the logic I used to create the program can certainly be adopted and applied elsewhere.\n I used Coleman's model for critical rate to determine quantitatively when a given well is likely to begin to slug. Critical rate is defined as the minimum gas rate needed to maintain steady flow up a well to the surface. When the gas rate in a well dips below this critical rate, the well will dip into the slug flow regime. Bottomhole pressure (BHP) is a necessary input for the critical rate calculation. Because BHP data is not readily available for wells producing up casing, I had to create an alternative approach to determining BHP. After investigation, I determined that using data from different combinations of water-gas ratio (WGR), wellhead pressure (WHP), and gas rate allowed me to create a correlation to approximate the BHP of any given well on any given producing day. The resulting correlation could be incorporated in my workflow and—after combined with other input data—my software could determine, with sufficient accuracy, the critical rate of any given well on any given producing day.\n An engineer can use my software to create a graph displaying both critical rate and gas rate with time for every well in a data set. Engineers can summarize the pertinent information from those plots in a data table which can assist them with creating a tubing installation schedule. This workflow will help engineers to determine more readily whether any of their wells are on the verge of slugging, allowing them to be more proactive in installing tubing on their wells and preventing costly deferred production.","PeriodicalId":10909,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/199782-stu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When wells producing up casing in the Marcellus Shale dip into the slug flow regime, their production begins to drop off significantly. In some instances, wells that begin slugging dramatically can defer the majority of the production that they were delivering just months before slugging, resulting in significant loss in present value. To remedy this complication, engineers can install tubing in these wells to help lift fluids through the vertical section. Because slugging causes large fluctuations in production, most slugging is identified and addressed only after a production engineer notices these fluctuations. This can be months after the decrease in production rate. To challenge this reactive approach to identifying wells ready for tubing installation, I created a workflow—implemented with software—to create a tubing installation schedule which requires little time or effort by the production engineer. While it is unlikely this program can be replicated exactly, the logic I used to create the program can certainly be adopted and applied elsewhere. I used Coleman's model for critical rate to determine quantitatively when a given well is likely to begin to slug. Critical rate is defined as the minimum gas rate needed to maintain steady flow up a well to the surface. When the gas rate in a well dips below this critical rate, the well will dip into the slug flow regime. Bottomhole pressure (BHP) is a necessary input for the critical rate calculation. Because BHP data is not readily available for wells producing up casing, I had to create an alternative approach to determining BHP. After investigation, I determined that using data from different combinations of water-gas ratio (WGR), wellhead pressure (WHP), and gas rate allowed me to create a correlation to approximate the BHP of any given well on any given producing day. The resulting correlation could be incorporated in my workflow and—after combined with other input data—my software could determine, with sufficient accuracy, the critical rate of any given well on any given producing day. An engineer can use my software to create a graph displaying both critical rate and gas rate with time for every well in a data set. Engineers can summarize the pertinent information from those plots in a data table which can assist them with creating a tubing installation schedule. This workflow will help engineers to determine more readily whether any of their wells are on the verge of slugging, allowing them to be more proactive in installing tubing on their wells and preventing costly deferred production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动方法最大限度地减少了段塞流造成的生产损失
当Marcellus页岩中生产套管的井进入段塞流状态时,其产量开始显著下降。在某些情况下,开始段塞流的油井可能会推迟其在段塞流前几个月交付的大部分产量,从而导致现值的重大损失。为了解决这一问题,工程师可以在这些井中安装油管,以帮助流体通过垂直段。由于段塞流会导致生产产生较大波动,因此大多数段塞流只有在生产工程师注意到这些波动后才能被识别和解决。这可能是在产量下降后的几个月。为了挑战这种被动的方法来识别准备安装油管的井,我创建了一个用软件实现的工作流程来创建油管安装计划,这只需要生产工程师很少的时间和精力。虽然不太可能完全复制这个程序,但我用来创建程序的逻辑肯定可以被采用并应用到其他地方。我使用Coleman的临界速率模型来定量地确定某口井可能开始段塞流的时间。临界速率的定义是维持井底稳定流至地面所需的最小产气量。当一口井的产气量降到这个临界速率以下时,井将进入段塞流状态。井底压力(BHP)是计算临界速率的必要输入。由于BHP数据不容易用于生产套管的井,因此我必须创建一种替代方法来确定BHP。经过调查,我确定使用来自不同组合的水气比(WGR)、井口压力(WHP)和产气量的数据可以创建一个相关性,以近似于任何给定生产日任何给定井的BHP。由此产生的相关性可以纳入我的工作流程,并且在与其他输入数据相结合之后,我的软件可以以足够的准确性确定任何给定井在任何给定生产日的临界速率。工程师可以使用我的软件创建一个图表,显示数据集中每口井的临界速率和产气速率随时间的变化。工程师可以将这些图中的相关信息汇总到数据表中,以帮助他们制定油管安装计划。该工作流程将帮助工程师更容易地确定他们的井是否处于段塞的边缘,使他们能够更主动地在井中安装油管,并防止昂贵的延期生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verification of Autonomous Inflow Control Valve Flow Performance Within Heavy Oil-SAGD Thermal Flow Loop Reactive vs Proactive Intelligent Well Injection Evaluation for EOR in a Stratified GOM Deepwater Wilcox Reservoir using Integrated Simulation-Surface Network Modeling A Novel Workflow for Oil Production Forecasting using Ensemble-Based Decline Curve Analysis An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict the Water Saturation in Carbonate Reservoir Rocks Characterization of Organic Pores within High-Maturation Shale Gas Reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1