Applying Students' Perspectives on Different Teaching Strategies: A Holistic View of Service-Learning Community Engagement

A. Ricke
{"title":"Applying Students' Perspectives on Different Teaching Strategies: A Holistic View of Service-Learning Community Engagement","authors":"A. Ricke","doi":"10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0027.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From a university perspective, service- learning and community engagement (SLCE) has been identified as a high- impact practice that offers advantages over traditional lecture and assignments, yet students do not always embrace SLCE courses. While most studies of undergraduate students’ perceptions of SLCE focus on particular experiences or on SLCE in general, contextualizing these findings within students’ percep tions of various teaching strategies and knowledge can better assist faculty in engaging students. Drawing on cognitive anthropology, this article is one of the first to conduct a cultural domain analysis to provide insights into how undergraduates conceptualize SLCE in relation to other teaching strategies. This broader analysis of the associations undergraduates make with SLCE reveals how these can carry ramifications for quality engagement with the project and community partners. The results include how faculty can design and scaffold SLCE into their courses in the absence of a centralized agency or formal campus- wide process for regulating SLCE experiences. From a university perspective, service- learning and community engagement (SLCE) has been identified as a high- impact practice that offers certain advantages over traditional lecture and assignments, yet some students do not always recognize the benefits of SLCE. 1 Past research reveals that part of the context that influences students’ understandings of and responses to SLCE includes students’ life experiences and identities, their expe-1.","PeriodicalId":93128,"journal":{"name":"Michigan journal of community service learning","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan journal of community service learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0027.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

From a university perspective, service- learning and community engagement (SLCE) has been identified as a high- impact practice that offers advantages over traditional lecture and assignments, yet students do not always embrace SLCE courses. While most studies of undergraduate students’ perceptions of SLCE focus on particular experiences or on SLCE in general, contextualizing these findings within students’ percep tions of various teaching strategies and knowledge can better assist faculty in engaging students. Drawing on cognitive anthropology, this article is one of the first to conduct a cultural domain analysis to provide insights into how undergraduates conceptualize SLCE in relation to other teaching strategies. This broader analysis of the associations undergraduates make with SLCE reveals how these can carry ramifications for quality engagement with the project and community partners. The results include how faculty can design and scaffold SLCE into their courses in the absence of a centralized agency or formal campus- wide process for regulating SLCE experiences. From a university perspective, service- learning and community engagement (SLCE) has been identified as a high- impact practice that offers certain advantages over traditional lecture and assignments, yet some students do not always recognize the benefits of SLCE. 1 Past research reveals that part of the context that influences students’ understandings of and responses to SLCE includes students’ life experiences and identities, their expe-1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用学生的观点进行不同的教学策略:服务学习社区参与的整体观点
从大学的角度来看,服务学习和社区参与(SLCE)已经被确定为一种高影响力的实践,它比传统的讲座和作业提供了优势,但学生并不总是接受SLCE课程。虽然大多数关于本科生SLCE认知的研究都集中在特定经历或总体上,但将这些研究结果置于学生对各种教学策略和知识的认知中,可以更好地帮助教师吸引学生。利用认知人类学,本文是第一个进行文化领域分析的文章之一,以深入了解本科生如何将外语教学与其他教学策略概念化。对大学生与SLCE建立的联系的更广泛的分析揭示了这些联系如何对与项目和社区合作伙伴的高质量参与产生影响。研究结果包括教师如何在缺乏中央机构或正式的校园范围流程来规范SLCE经验的情况下,将SLCE设计和支撑到他们的课程中。从大学的角度来看,服务学习和社区参与(SLCE)已经被认为是一种高影响力的实践,它比传统的讲座和作业提供了一定的优势,然而一些学生并不总是认识到SLCE的好处。过去的研究表明,影响学生对外语学习的理解和反应的部分语境包括学生的生活经历和身份,即他们的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Title Pending 5477 Daniels, R., Shreve, G., & Spector, P. (2021). What Universities Owe Democracy. John Hopkins University Press. List of Reviewers Reviewers - Volume 27.2 Validation of S-LOMS and Comparison Between Hong Kong and Singapore of Student Developmental Outcomes After Service-Learning Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1