A Mechanistic Approach for Calculating Oil-Gas Relative Permeability Curves in Unconventional Reservoirs

Bartosz Czernia, M. Barrufet
{"title":"A Mechanistic Approach for Calculating Oil-Gas Relative Permeability Curves in Unconventional Reservoirs","authors":"Bartosz Czernia, M. Barrufet","doi":"10.2118/196051-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A mechanistic approach for calculation of oil-gas capillary pressure curves and relative permeabilities in unconventional reservoirs is presented. The approach accounts for reservoir fluid composition, contact angle wettability and pore size distribution of each specific reservoir and generates a unique set of relative permeability curves based on those inputs. This allows calculation of curves in reservoirs where historical production data is limited.\n Phase behavior calculations are computed by coupling the Peng-Robinson equation of state and the Young-Laplace capillary pressure model. This coupling allows for inclusion of the effect of confinement of reservoir fluids on volumetric and transport properties.\n The reservoir is modeled as a bundle of tubes with diameters representative of the pore size distribution found in the reservoir. A multi-step depletion is modeled followed by gas injection and a secondary depletion. Separate capillary pressure results are obtained for each part of the process. After the capillary pressure curves are generated, an integration is performed on the capillary results to generate a set of relative permeability curves following the Nakornthap and Evans method (1986).\n The multi-step process is used to allow recalculation of the relative permeability curves as the reservoir fluid composition changes due to the initial depletion and then secondary gas injection.The approach yields a unique set of relative permeability results for each set of input parameters.The mechanistic approach is demonstrated on two different oil compositions, a black oil sample and a volatile oil. For each of the oil compositions, two different injection gasses are evaluated (methane and carbon dioxide). The intermediate calculations are summarized and the final permeability results are included in the paper. The results show that for both oil samples evaluated, the gas injection results in an increase in oil relative permeability. Carbon dioxide is more effective at increasing the oil relative permeability than methane for both oil samples. This suggests that carbon dioxide could be an effective option for enhanced oil recovery operations in unconventional reservoirs.\n A unique element of the approach presented is that the calculation of relative permeability curves for the initial reservoir depletion is immediately followed by the calculation of new relative permeability curves as the reservoir composition changes due to gas injection. This allows prediction of relative permeability results in an unconventional reservoir for both the initial reservoir depletion and also for hypothetical enhanced oil recovery operations. Since the model can be run quickly and repeatedly, sensitivity analyses can be performed on the permeability curves as a function of initial reservoir conditions and injection gas compositions and amounts.","PeriodicalId":10909,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196051-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A mechanistic approach for calculation of oil-gas capillary pressure curves and relative permeabilities in unconventional reservoirs is presented. The approach accounts for reservoir fluid composition, contact angle wettability and pore size distribution of each specific reservoir and generates a unique set of relative permeability curves based on those inputs. This allows calculation of curves in reservoirs where historical production data is limited. Phase behavior calculations are computed by coupling the Peng-Robinson equation of state and the Young-Laplace capillary pressure model. This coupling allows for inclusion of the effect of confinement of reservoir fluids on volumetric and transport properties. The reservoir is modeled as a bundle of tubes with diameters representative of the pore size distribution found in the reservoir. A multi-step depletion is modeled followed by gas injection and a secondary depletion. Separate capillary pressure results are obtained for each part of the process. After the capillary pressure curves are generated, an integration is performed on the capillary results to generate a set of relative permeability curves following the Nakornthap and Evans method (1986). The multi-step process is used to allow recalculation of the relative permeability curves as the reservoir fluid composition changes due to the initial depletion and then secondary gas injection.The approach yields a unique set of relative permeability results for each set of input parameters.The mechanistic approach is demonstrated on two different oil compositions, a black oil sample and a volatile oil. For each of the oil compositions, two different injection gasses are evaluated (methane and carbon dioxide). The intermediate calculations are summarized and the final permeability results are included in the paper. The results show that for both oil samples evaluated, the gas injection results in an increase in oil relative permeability. Carbon dioxide is more effective at increasing the oil relative permeability than methane for both oil samples. This suggests that carbon dioxide could be an effective option for enhanced oil recovery operations in unconventional reservoirs. A unique element of the approach presented is that the calculation of relative permeability curves for the initial reservoir depletion is immediately followed by the calculation of new relative permeability curves as the reservoir composition changes due to gas injection. This allows prediction of relative permeability results in an unconventional reservoir for both the initial reservoir depletion and also for hypothetical enhanced oil recovery operations. Since the model can be run quickly and repeatedly, sensitivity analyses can be performed on the permeability curves as a function of initial reservoir conditions and injection gas compositions and amounts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非常规储层油气相对渗透率曲线的力学计算方法
提出了一种计算非常规油藏油气毛细管压力曲线和相对渗透率的机理方法。该方法考虑了每个特定储层的储层流体成分、接触角润湿性和孔径分布,并基于这些输入生成了一套独特的相对渗透率曲线。这使得在历史生产数据有限的油藏中计算曲线成为可能。将Peng-Robinson状态方程与Young-Laplace毛细管压力模型耦合计算相行为。这种耦合考虑了储层流体约束对体积和输运特性的影响。将储层建模为一束直径代表储层孔隙大小分布的管子。模拟了多步衰竭,然后是注气和二次衰竭。对过程的每个部分分别获得毛细管压力结果。生成毛管压力曲线后,按照Nakornthap和Evans方法(1986)对毛管结果进行积分,得到一组相对渗透率曲线。当储层流体成分因初始衰竭和二次注气而发生变化时,采用多步骤过程可以重新计算相对渗透率曲线。对于每组输入参数,该方法产生一组独特的相对渗透率结果。机械方法在两种不同的油组成上进行了演示,一种是黑油样品,另一种是挥发油。对于每种油成分,评估了两种不同的注入气体(甲烷和二氧化碳)。文中总结了中间计算过程,并给出了最终渗透率计算结果。结果表明,对于两种评价的油样,注气均使油的相对渗透率增加。对于两种油样而言,二氧化碳比甲烷更能有效地增加油的相对渗透率。这表明,在非常规油藏中,二氧化碳可能是提高采收率的有效选择。该方法的一个独特之处在于,当储层成分因注气而发生变化时,在计算油藏初始枯竭时的相对渗透率曲线之后,立即计算新的相对渗透率曲线。这可以预测非常规油藏的相对渗透率结果,既可以预测油藏的初始枯竭,也可以预测假设的提高采收率的操作。由于该模型可以快速重复运行,因此可以对渗透率曲线进行敏感性分析,并将其作为初始储层条件和注入气体成分和数量的函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verification of Autonomous Inflow Control Valve Flow Performance Within Heavy Oil-SAGD Thermal Flow Loop Reactive vs Proactive Intelligent Well Injection Evaluation for EOR in a Stratified GOM Deepwater Wilcox Reservoir using Integrated Simulation-Surface Network Modeling A Novel Workflow for Oil Production Forecasting using Ensemble-Based Decline Curve Analysis An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict the Water Saturation in Carbonate Reservoir Rocks Characterization of Organic Pores within High-Maturation Shale Gas Reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1