Comparison of Panel Cointegration Tests

IF 0.6 Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Economics Bulletin Pub Date : 2007-05-18 DOI:10.18452/4048
D. K. Örsal
{"title":"Comparison of Panel Cointegration Tests","authors":"D. K. Örsal","doi":"10.18452/4048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of this paper is to compare the size and size-adjusted power properties of four residual-based and one maximum-likelihood-based panel cointegration tests with the help of Monte Carlo simulations. In this study the panel-rho, the group-rho, the parametric panel-t, the parametric group-t statistics of Pedroni(1999} and the standardized LR-bar statistic of Larsson et al.(2001} are considered. The simulation results indicate that the panel-t and the standardized LR-bar statistic have the best size and power properties among the five panel cointegration test statistics evaluated.","PeriodicalId":47355,"journal":{"name":"Economics Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"72","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18452/4048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to compare the size and size-adjusted power properties of four residual-based and one maximum-likelihood-based panel cointegration tests with the help of Monte Carlo simulations. In this study the panel-rho, the group-rho, the parametric panel-t, the parametric group-t statistics of Pedroni(1999} and the standardized LR-bar statistic of Larsson et al.(2001} are considered. The simulation results indicate that the panel-t and the standardized LR-bar statistic have the best size and power properties among the five panel cointegration test statistics evaluated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面板协整检验比较
本文的主要目的是利用蒙特卡罗模拟比较四种基于残差的面板协整检验和一种基于最大似然的面板协整检验的尺寸和尺寸调整功率特性。本研究考虑了Pedroni(1999)的panel-rho、group-rho、参数panel-t、参数group-t统计量和Larsson等(2001)的标准化LR-bar统计量。仿真结果表明,在评估的5种面板协整检验统计量中,panel-t和标准化LR-bar统计量具有最佳的尺寸和功率特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economics Bulletin
Economics Bulletin ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The Economic Bulletin is an open-access letters journal founded in 2001 with the mission of providing free and extremely rapid scientific communication across the entire community of research economists. EB publishes original notes, comments, and preliminary results. We are especially interested in publishingmanuscripts that keep the profession informed about on-going research programs. Our publication standard is that a manuscript be original, correct and of interest to a specialist. Submissions in these categories are refereed and our objective is to make a decision within two months. Accepted papers are published immediately. It is expected that in many cases, manuscripts published in these categories will form the foundation for more complete works to besubsequently submitted to other journals. In all cases, submissions are restricted to seven printed pages exclusive of references, tables, figures, and appendices, and must be in PDF format. EB also publishes non-refereed letters to the editor, conference announcements and research announcements.
期刊最新文献
The COVID-19 risk perception: A survey on socioeconomics and media attention Election Uncertainty and Capital Structure Holiday Gift-Giving – Deadweight Loss or Welfare Gain? Same, but Different? a State-Level Chronology of the 2014-2016 Brazilian Economic Recession and Comparisons with the GFC and (Early Data On) COVID-19 (preprint) Do fiscal rules breed inequality? First evidence for the EU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1