Prediction of Surface Finish on Hardened Bearing Steel Machined by Ceramic Cutting Tool

IF 0.6 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing Pub Date : 2023-05-17 DOI:10.4271/05-16-03-0021
Y. Şahin
{"title":"Prediction of Surface Finish on Hardened Bearing Steel Machined by\n Ceramic Cutting Tool","authors":"Y. Şahin","doi":"10.4271/05-16-03-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prediction of the surface finish of hardened bearing steels was estimated in\n machining with ceramic uncoated cutting tools under various process parameters\n using two statistical approaches. A second-order (quadratic) regression model\n (MQR, multiple quantile regression) for the surface finish was developed and\n then compared with the artificial neural network (ANN) method based on the\n coefficient determination (R\n 2), root mean square error (RMSE), and percentage error (PE). The\n experimental results exhibited that cutting speed was the dominant parameter,\n but feed rate and depth of cut were insignificant in terms of the Pareto chart\n and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The optimum surface finish in machining\n bearing steel was achieved at 100 m/min speed, 0.1 mm/revolution (rev) feed\n rate, and 0.6 mm depth of cut. In addition, the ANN model revealed a better\n performance than that of MQR for predicting the surface finish when machining\n the hardened bearing steels because R\n 2 was about 0.787 and 0.903 for MQR and ANN, respectively. Besides,\n these were associated with RMSE of 0.302 and 0.1071 for MQR and ANN. Further, PE\n estimated from randomly selected data were about 25.56% and 10.86% for MQR and\n ANN, respectively. However, MQR presented the lowest error of 2.86%, but the\n highest error of 40.3%, while ANN indicated the lowest error of 0.11%, but the\n highest error of 37.0%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":45859,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/05-16-03-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Prediction of the surface finish of hardened bearing steels was estimated in machining with ceramic uncoated cutting tools under various process parameters using two statistical approaches. A second-order (quadratic) regression model (MQR, multiple quantile regression) for the surface finish was developed and then compared with the artificial neural network (ANN) method based on the coefficient determination (R 2), root mean square error (RMSE), and percentage error (PE). The experimental results exhibited that cutting speed was the dominant parameter, but feed rate and depth of cut were insignificant in terms of the Pareto chart and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The optimum surface finish in machining bearing steel was achieved at 100 m/min speed, 0.1 mm/revolution (rev) feed rate, and 0.6 mm depth of cut. In addition, the ANN model revealed a better performance than that of MQR for predicting the surface finish when machining the hardened bearing steels because R 2 was about 0.787 and 0.903 for MQR and ANN, respectively. Besides, these were associated with RMSE of 0.302 and 0.1071 for MQR and ANN. Further, PE estimated from randomly selected data were about 25.56% and 10.86% for MQR and ANN, respectively. However, MQR presented the lowest error of 2.86%, but the highest error of 40.3%, while ANN indicated the lowest error of 0.11%, but the highest error of 37.0%, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陶瓷刀具加工淬硬轴承钢表面光洁度的预测
采用两种统计方法对不同工艺参数下陶瓷无涂层刀具加工淬硬轴承钢的表面光洁度进行了预测。建立了表面光洁度的二阶(二次)回归模型(MQR,多分位数回归),并与基于系数确定(r2)、均方根误差(RMSE)和百分比误差(PE)的人工神经网络(ANN)方法进行了比较。实验结果表明,在Pareto图和方差分析(ANOVA)中,切削速度是主要参数,而进给速度和切削深度不显著。在100 m/min的速度、0.1 mm/转的进给速度和0.6 mm的切削深度下,获得了轴承钢的最佳表面光洁度。此外,由于MQR和ANN模型的r2分别约为0.787和0.903,ANN模型在预测淬火轴承钢的表面光洁度方面表现出比MQR模型更好的性能。此外,MQR和ANN的RMSE分别为0.302和0.1071。此外,从随机选择的数据中估计的MQR和ANN的PE分别约为25.56%和10.86%。而MQR算法的误差最低为2.86%,但最高为40.3%;ANN算法的误差最低为0.11%,但最高为37.0%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing
SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Effect of Temperature and Frequency on the Viscoelastic Behavior of Commercial 6082 (Al–Mg–Si) Alloy Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Nanocomposites Modified with Amine-Functionalized Graphene Fabrication and Characterization of Silicon Dioxide-Reinforced Polydimethylsiloxane Composite Coating for Corrosion Protection of Galvanized Iron Role of Different Reinforcements in Aluminium 7075-Based Metal Matrix Composite—A Review Experimental Analysis of Heat Transfer Post Quenching of Medium Carbon Steel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1