“Read-To-Write-Tasks” in English for Specific Purposes Classes

G. Kavaliauskienė, Jelena Suchanova
{"title":"“Read-To-Write-Tasks” in English for Specific Purposes Classes","authors":"G. Kavaliauskienė, Jelena Suchanova","doi":"10.3846/COACTIVITY.2010.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At university level students face demanding tasks of reading an enormous amount of professional materials in English. Writing various assignments is another challenging part of higher education. Online activities are the priority for conducting assignments at tertiary level. Students usually start doing the English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course before learning subject-matters of the future profession, i.e. in their first year. The cornerstone of the ESP is unfamiliar lexis and numerous concepts of subject-matter. In order to succeed, students need to develop proficiency in reading professional texts and writing skillfully on relevant subject issues. The aim of this paper is to study, first, learners‘ attitudes to online reading of professional materials as well as to writing various assignments online and, second, to examine learners‘ self-assessment of proficiency in these skills. Our research employed brief written surveys designed in accordance with the standards in Social Sciences, which were administered to the students doing the ESP course, and the verbal data obtained during individual interviews intended to assess learners‘ success and achievements throughout the academic year. The respondents were the students specializing in psychology at Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania. All the participants were unanimous in the importance of writing and reading skills for the ESP tasks. 100% of respondents support reading professional materials, and 80% of respondents support exercising online writing. Self-assessment of reading proficiency demonstrates that 90% of students believe they possess very good or good skills of reading, and 70% of learners are sure of their good skills in writing. Respondents’ performance in these skills is less impressive. Some recommendations towards perfecting students’ proficiency in “read-to-write-tasks” are suggested. It is important to help learners develop better rates of reading and learn to employ metacognitive strategies in writing. Article in English","PeriodicalId":53267,"journal":{"name":"Santalka Filosofija Komunikacija","volume":"45 10 1","pages":"57-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Santalka Filosofija Komunikacija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/COACTIVITY.2010.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At university level students face demanding tasks of reading an enormous amount of professional materials in English. Writing various assignments is another challenging part of higher education. Online activities are the priority for conducting assignments at tertiary level. Students usually start doing the English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course before learning subject-matters of the future profession, i.e. in their first year. The cornerstone of the ESP is unfamiliar lexis and numerous concepts of subject-matter. In order to succeed, students need to develop proficiency in reading professional texts and writing skillfully on relevant subject issues. The aim of this paper is to study, first, learners‘ attitudes to online reading of professional materials as well as to writing various assignments online and, second, to examine learners‘ self-assessment of proficiency in these skills. Our research employed brief written surveys designed in accordance with the standards in Social Sciences, which were administered to the students doing the ESP course, and the verbal data obtained during individual interviews intended to assess learners‘ success and achievements throughout the academic year. The respondents were the students specializing in psychology at Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania. All the participants were unanimous in the importance of writing and reading skills for the ESP tasks. 100% of respondents support reading professional materials, and 80% of respondents support exercising online writing. Self-assessment of reading proficiency demonstrates that 90% of students believe they possess very good or good skills of reading, and 70% of learners are sure of their good skills in writing. Respondents’ performance in these skills is less impressive. Some recommendations towards perfecting students’ proficiency in “read-to-write-tasks” are suggested. It is important to help learners develop better rates of reading and learn to employ metacognitive strategies in writing. Article in English
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特殊用途英语课堂的“读写任务”
在大学阶段,学生面临着阅读大量英语专业材料的艰巨任务。写各种作业是高等教育中另一个具有挑战性的部分。网上活动是高等教育阶段作业的重点。学生通常在学习未来职业的主题之前开始学习特殊用途英语(ESP)课程,即在第一年。ESP的基础是不熟悉的词汇和大量的主题概念。为了取得成功,学生需要熟练地阅读专业文本,并熟练地就相关主题问题进行写作。本文的目的首先是研究学习者对在线阅读专业材料以及在线撰写各种作业的态度,其次是考察学习者对这些技能熟练程度的自我评估。我们的研究采用了按照社会科学标准设计的简短的书面调查,这些调查是对学习ESP课程的学生进行的,以及在个人访谈中获得的口头数据,旨在评估学习者在整个学年的成功和成就。受访者是立陶宛维尔纽斯米科拉斯·罗梅里斯大学心理学专业的学生。所有的参与者都一致认为写作和阅读技能对于ESP任务的重要性。100%的受访者支持阅读专业材料,80%的受访者支持练习在线写作。阅读能力自我评估表明,90%的学生认为自己拥有非常好或良好的阅读技能,70%的学习者确信自己拥有良好的写作技能。受访者在这些技能方面的表现并不令人印象深刻。对提高学生对“读写任务”的熟练程度提出了一些建议。帮助学习者提高阅读速度和学习在写作中运用元认知策略是很重要的。英文文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Practical and Academic Application for Knowledge of Lanquage for Specific Purposes The Development of the Standard Lithuanian Language: Ecolinguistic Approach LEXICAL FEATURES OF SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE Application of the Elements of Problem-Based Learning in Professional Foreign Language Studies at LUHS Analysis of Adaptation of Smartphone Operating Systems for Work in the Lithuanian Linguistic Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1