"Meaningful Information" and the Right to Explanation

Andrew D. Selbst, Julia E. Powles
{"title":"\"Meaningful Information\" and the Right to Explanation","authors":"Andrew D. Selbst, Julia E. Powles","doi":"10.1093/IDPL/IPX022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no single, neat statutory provision labeled the “right to explanation” in Europe’s new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). But nor is such a right illusory. \nResponding to two prominent papers that, in turn, conjure and critique the right to explanation in the context of automated decision-making, we advocate a return to the text of the GDPR. \nArticles 13-15 provide rights to “meaningful information about the logic involved” in automated decisions. This is a right to explanation, whether one uses the phrase or not. \nThe right to explanation should be interpreted functionally, flexibly, and should, at a minimum, enable a data subject to exercise his or her rights under the GDPR and human rights law.","PeriodicalId":19400,"journal":{"name":"Oil & Fat Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"342","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oil & Fat Industries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/IDPL/IPX022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 342

Abstract

There is no single, neat statutory provision labeled the “right to explanation” in Europe’s new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). But nor is such a right illusory. Responding to two prominent papers that, in turn, conjure and critique the right to explanation in the context of automated decision-making, we advocate a return to the text of the GDPR. Articles 13-15 provide rights to “meaningful information about the logic involved” in automated decisions. This is a right to explanation, whether one uses the phrase or not. The right to explanation should be interpreted functionally, flexibly, and should, at a minimum, enable a data subject to exercise his or her rights under the GDPR and human rights law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“有意义的信息”与解释权
在欧洲新颁布的《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)中,并没有明确的“解释权”规定。但这种权利并不是虚幻的。作为对两篇著名论文的回应,我们主张回归GDPR的文本,这两篇论文反过来又对自动决策背景下的解释权提出了质疑。第13-15条规定了在自动决策中获得“有关所涉逻辑的有意义信息”的权利。这是一种解释权,不管一个人是否使用这个短语。解释的权利应该被灵活地解释,并且至少应该使数据主体能够行使他或她在GDPR和人权法下的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts from other journals Foe Fetish Keynote 2 "Meaningful Information" and the Right to Explanation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1