An Experimental Analytical and In Vitro Approach to Bridge Between Different Heated Tobacco Product Variants

T. Jaunky, D. Thorne, Andrew Baxter, Simone Hadley, J. Frosina, D. Breheny, James J. Murphy, M. Gaca
{"title":"An Experimental Analytical and In Vitro Approach to Bridge Between Different Heated Tobacco Product Variants","authors":"T. Jaunky, D. Thorne, Andrew Baxter, Simone Hadley, J. Frosina, D. Breheny, James J. Murphy, M. Gaca","doi":"10.2478/cttr-2022-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Tobacco heating products (THPs) have reduced toxicant emissions relative to cigarettes. THPs are continually evolving, but safety and efficacy studies on each new variant involve considerable resources. As employed by the pharmaceutical industry, a “bridging” process could be used to demonstrate product equivalence. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility of a bridging approach by evaluating aerosol emissions and in vitro cytotoxicity of five variant THPs in relation to a base product. All products were compared to a reference cigarette and a commercial benchmark. Relative to smoke, chemical reductions in THP aerosols were comparable among the THPs at 94–97%. The aerosols showed similar cytotoxicity in human lung tissues exposed at the air-liquid interface (p = 0.8378) but were significantly less toxic than smoke (p = 0.04). Relative to the THP benchmark, variant THPs showed lower cytotoxicity (p = 0.0141). Emissions and cytotoxicity data demonstrated that the variant THPs were comparable to the base THP, irrespective of consumable format or flavour. This dataset demonstrates the feasibility of a bridging approach and can inform an evidence-based strategy in developing sufficient data to predict similarity against an already established dataset. Therefore, avoiding repetition of vast data generation could ease authorisation requirements of newer products. Finally, we propose that more work is required to understand chemical, biological (in vitro), human consumption, and clinical data before the equivalence of these products (and others) can be definitively demonstrated. Future studies maybe needed to assess additional chemical and biological outputs and all data will need to be contextualised against human consumption data in terms of a bridging framework.","PeriodicalId":10723,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"1 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2022-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Summary Tobacco heating products (THPs) have reduced toxicant emissions relative to cigarettes. THPs are continually evolving, but safety and efficacy studies on each new variant involve considerable resources. As employed by the pharmaceutical industry, a “bridging” process could be used to demonstrate product equivalence. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility of a bridging approach by evaluating aerosol emissions and in vitro cytotoxicity of five variant THPs in relation to a base product. All products were compared to a reference cigarette and a commercial benchmark. Relative to smoke, chemical reductions in THP aerosols were comparable among the THPs at 94–97%. The aerosols showed similar cytotoxicity in human lung tissues exposed at the air-liquid interface (p = 0.8378) but were significantly less toxic than smoke (p = 0.04). Relative to the THP benchmark, variant THPs showed lower cytotoxicity (p = 0.0141). Emissions and cytotoxicity data demonstrated that the variant THPs were comparable to the base THP, irrespective of consumable format or flavour. This dataset demonstrates the feasibility of a bridging approach and can inform an evidence-based strategy in developing sufficient data to predict similarity against an already established dataset. Therefore, avoiding repetition of vast data generation could ease authorisation requirements of newer products. Finally, we propose that more work is required to understand chemical, biological (in vitro), human consumption, and clinical data before the equivalence of these products (and others) can be definitively demonstrated. Future studies maybe needed to assess additional chemical and biological outputs and all data will need to be contextualised against human consumption data in terms of a bridging framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同加热烟草制品变异体间桥梁的实验分析和体外方法
与香烟相比,烟草加热产品(THPs)减少了有毒物质的排放。thp不断发展,但每一种新变体的安全性和有效性研究都需要大量资源。正如制药工业所采用的,“桥接”过程可用于证明产品等效性。因此,我们通过评估气溶胶排放和与基础产品相关的五种变体THPs的体外细胞毒性来研究桥接方法的可行性。所有产品都与参考卷烟和商业基准进行了比较。相对于烟雾,THP气溶胶的化学减少量在THP中是相似的,在94-97%之间。气溶胶对暴露在气液界面的人肺组织的细胞毒性相似(p = 0.8378),但毒性明显低于烟雾(p = 0.04)。相对于THP基准,变异THP的细胞毒性较低(p = 0.0141)。排放物和细胞毒性数据表明,无论消费形式或风味如何,变体THP与基本THP相当。该数据集展示了桥接方法的可行性,并可以为基于证据的策略提供信息,以开发足够的数据来预测与已建立数据集的相似性。因此,避免重复大量数据生成可以简化新产品的授权要求。最后,我们建议在确定这些产品(和其他产品)的等效性之前,需要做更多的工作来了解化学,生物(体外),人类消费和临床数据。未来的研究可能需要评估更多的化学和生物产出,所有数据都需要在衔接框架方面与人类消费数据相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative In Vitro Toxicological Screening of a Closed-End Heated Tobacco Product * Plasma Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches Across Varying Flavours and Nicotine Content * A Pumping Method for Assessing Airtightness of Packs - Application to Heated Tobacco Products * Purchase Intent and Product Appeal of Velo Nicotine Pouches Among Current Tobacco Users and Nonusers of Tobacco How do Risk Perceptions Drive Smokers to Completely Switch to a Smoke-Free Tobacco Product (IQOS™)? A Four-Country Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1